Article ID: CBB043729764

‘Eadem, sed aliter’: Arthur Schopenhauer as a Critic of ‘Progress’ (2015)

unapi

Scholars have tended to overlook the political import of the ideas of Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860). This is perhaps unsurprising, since Schopenhauer himself was not a political philosopher and wrote relatively little about political matters. But Schopenhauer's near-silence on political topics should warrant our attention: why would a systematic philosopher, who made lasting contributions in metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics, devote so little attention to politics? Connecting his political thought with his philosophy of history, I argue that Schopenhauer can best be regarded as a critic of the idea of progress, especially ‘progress’ conceived of as national development or the growth of the state.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB043729764/

Similar Citations

Chapter Schäfer, Lothar; (2006)
Autonomy versus Development: Duhem on Progress in Science (/isis/citation/CBB001033919/)

Book Paul Warde; (2018)
The Invention of Sustainability: Nature and Destiny, c.1500-1870 (/isis/citation/CBB208491222/)

Chapter Massimo Ferrari; (2018)
“Uno strenuo difensore” di Mach: John Bernhard Stallo (/isis/citation/CBB213065857/)

Chapter Luca Guidetti; (2018)
Il problema dell'analogia in Ernst Mach (/isis/citation/CBB358140394/)

Chapter Susanna Zellini; (2018)
Wittgenstein, Mach e il senso comune (/isis/citation/CBB902592785/)

Book Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat; Schandeler, Jean-Pierre; Crépel, Pierre; Brian, Eric; (2004)
Tableau Historique des progrès de l'esprit humain: Projets, Esquisse, Fragments et Notes (1772-1794) (/isis/citation/CBB000750940/)

Chapter Marco Buzzoni; (2018)
Ernst Mach interprete di Pierre Duhem. Valore e limiti della sperimentazione mentale (/isis/citation/CBB306281511/)

Chapter Erik C. Banks; (2018)
The Case for Mach's Neutral Monism (/isis/citation/CBB571671358/)

Article Uebel, Thomas; (2009)
Knowing Who Your Friends Are: Aspects of the Politics of Logical Empiricism (/isis/citation/CBB001032854/)

Chapter Paolo Parrini; (2018)
Ernst Mach and the Disenchantment of Metaphysics (/isis/citation/CBB153044104/)

Chapter Gereon Wolters; (2018)
Mach e la relatività: una storia infinita ambientata a HOPOSia? (/isis/citation/CBB146853924/)

Chapter Daniela Steila; (2018)
La fortuna di Mach nella Russia pre-rivoluzionaria (/isis/citation/CBB928582006/)

Chapter Pietro Gori; (2018)
Ernst Mach dal punto di vista storico-critico (/isis/citation/CBB020210950/)

Book Pietro Gori; (2018)
Ernst Mach: tra scienza e filosofia (/isis/citation/CBB991429309/)

Chapter Giorgini, Giovanni; (2004)
Natura umana e identità europea: la sfida del neoaristotelismo (/isis/citation/CBB000500558/)

Article Irema, Nazim; (2011)
Bergson and Politics: Ottoman-Turkish Encounters with Innovation (/isis/citation/CBB001212429/)

Book Piero Martinetti; Luca Natali; (2018)
Le carte di Piero Martinetti (/isis/citation/CBB915909435/)

Authors & Contributors
Gori, Pietro
Martinetti, Piero
Zellini, Susanna
Natali, Luca
Guidetti, Luca
Wolters, Gereon
Journals
Science and Education
HOPOS
European Legacy
Publishers
Edizioni ETS
Olschki
Institut National d'Études Démographiques
Cambridge University Press
Concepts
History of philosophy of science
Philosophy of science
Philosophy
Philosophy and politics
Physics
Philosophy of science, as a discipline
People
Mach, Ernst
Reisch, George A.
Duhem, Pierre
Martinetti, Piero
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
Stallo, John Bernhard
Time Periods
19th century
20th century, early
20th century, late
20th century
18th century
17th century
Places
Europe
United States
Russia
North America
Italy
Germany
Institutions
Vienna Circle
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment