This paper examines the debate in the late 19th and early 20th centuries over the acceptability of atomic and molecular physics. It focuses on three prominent figures: Maxwell, who defended atomic physics, Ostwald, who initially rejected it but changed his mind as a result of experiments by Thomson and Perrin, and Duhem, who never accepted it. Each scientist defended the position he did in the light of strongly held methodological views concerning empirical evidence. The paper critically evaluates each of these methodological positions.
...MoreDescription On the late 19th- and early 20th-century debate over the acceptability of atomic and molecular physics. Focuses on Maxwell, Ostwald, and Duhem.
Similar Citations
Chapter
Brown, Daniel;
(2011)
Molecular Machines and Lascivious Bodies: James Clerk Maxwell's Verse-born Attacks on Tyndallic Reductionism
(/isis/citation/CBB001201382/)
Article
Kenichi Natsume;
(2022)
Abstractive and Hypothetical Methodologies of Energetics: Physical Sciences between Mechanics and Chemistry in Victorian Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB843016617/)
Article
Brakel, Jaap van;
(2013)
František Wald's Empiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB001320765/)
Article
Bordoni, Stafano;
(2013)
Routes Towards an Abstract Thermodynamics in the Late Nineteenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB001320791/)
Article
van Strien, Marij;
(2013)
The Nineteenth Century Conflict between Mechanism and Irreversibility
(/isis/citation/CBB001213355/)
Article
Deltete, Robert J.;
(2012)
Planck, Ostwald, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
(/isis/citation/CBB001232112/)
Article
Sonia Maria Dion;
(2018)
Natural Classification and Pierre Duhem's Historical Work: Which Relationships?
(/isis/citation/CBB874044967/)
Chapter
Pierre–Michel Vauthelin;
(2017)
Duhem et la thermodynamique française de la fin du XIXe siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB074154000/)
Book
Mirella Fortino;
(2017)
Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(/isis/citation/CBB718409602/)
Article
Brenner, Anastasios;
Needham, Paul;
Stump, David J.;
Deltete, Robert;
(2011)
New Perspectives on Pierre Duhem's The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB001032933/)
Article
Klodian Coko;
(2015)
Epistemology of a Believing Historian: Making Sense of Duhem's Anti-Atomism
(/isis/citation/CBB386493933/)
Chapter
Francesco Calemi;
(2017)
Sottodeterminazione e leggi di natura: Osservazioni sulla tesi Duhem–Quine
(/isis/citation/CBB568450738/)
Article
Charis Charalampous;
(2021)
The Confined Atom: James Clerk Maxwell on the Fundamental Particles and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB959157856/)
Chapter
Jean-François Stoffel;
(2017)
L’interprétation de l’«affaire Galilée» élaborée par Paul Mansion a–t–elle influencé Pierre Duhem?
(/isis/citation/CBB304403940/)
Chapter
Nersessian, Nancy J.;
(2001)
Concept formation and commensurability
(/isis/citation/CBB000102881/)
Chapter
Marco Buzzoni;
(2018)
Ernst Mach interprete di Pierre Duhem. Valore e limiti della sperimentazione mentale
(/isis/citation/CBB306281511/)
Chapter
Stefano Bordoni;
(2017)
Pierre Duhem 1891-1896. Dalla fisica teorica alla storia e filosofia della scienza
(/isis/citation/CBB719226825/)
Article
Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam;
(2015)
The Rationale Behind Pierre Duhem's Natural Classification
(/isis/citation/CBB925026101/)
Book
Peierls, Rudolf;
Lee, Sabine;
(2007)
Sir Rudolf Peierls: Selected Private and Scientific Correspondence, Volume 1
(/isis/citation/CBB000830505/)
Article
Cat, Jordi;
(2001)
On Understanding: Maxwell on the Methods of Illustration and Scientific Metaphor
(/isis/citation/CBB000100733/)
Be the first to comment!