Danielle K. Inkpen (Author)
Historians of science have long recognized the field as a socially heterogeneous space wherein different groups jostle for access and to assert the priority of their activities. This essay offers a new take on this heterogeneity by considering recreation as a form of moralized social belonging that scientists bring to the field. In the 1940s, when North American glaciology was emerging as a military-supported geophysical science, many glaciologists were also mountaineers. The essay analyzes a dispute between a mountaineer and a scientist-mountaineer that took place at this time, in which the scientist turned to mountaineering ethics to confront accusations of pseudoscience. The dispute is unintelligible unless one recognizes mountaineering as a form of social belonging with its own ends, techniques, standards, and virtues, capable of influencing how scientists negotiate life in the field. On this account, social heterogeneity and the means for navigating it not only arise through borrowings and appropriations from other social groups but are brought to the field through scientists’ prior commitments to other forms of social life. This suggests a new role for recreation in the history of science: identification with an avocational pursuit may shape moral and social life in the field.
...More
Book
PearlAnn Reichwein;
(2014)
Climber's Paradise: Making Canada's Mountain Parks, 1906-1974
Book
O. Alan Weltzien;
(2016)
Exceptional Mountains: A Cultural History of the Pacific Northwest Volcanoes
Article
Heggie, Vanessa;
(2013)
Experimental Physiology, Everest and Oxygen: From the Ghastly Kitchens to the Gasping Lung
Article
Carey, Mark;
(2012)
Mountaineers and Engineers: The Politics of International Science, Recreation, and Environmental Change in Twentieth-Century Peru
Article
David Fedman;
Martin Hood;
(2019)
Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan
Chapter
Rozwadowski, Helen M.;
(2010)
Playing By---and On and Under---the Sea: The Importance of Play for Knowing the Ocean
Chapter
Korsmo, Fae I.;
(2010)
Glaciology, the Arctic, and the U.S. Military, 1945--58
Book
Paul-André Rosental;
(2019)
A Human Garden: French Policy and the Transatlantic Legacies of Eugenic Experimentation
Book
Pigliucci, Massimo;
(2010)
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk
Book
Francesco Luzzini;
(2022)
Quando il mondo scalò il Sublime. Scienza e storia nel primo Memoriale dell'Hotel Nave d'Oro di Predazzo (1820-1875)
Article
Fedra A. Pizzato;
(2022)
Between the History of the Earth and the History of Men: Transdisciplinary Exchanges in Liberal Italy (1861–1915)
Article
Reidy, Michael;
(2010)
John Tyndall's Vertical Physics: From Rock Quarries to Icy Peaks
Book
Roland Jackson;
(2018)
The Ascent of John Tyndall: Victorian Scientist, Mountaineer, and Public Intellectual
Book
Caroline Schaumann;
(2020)
Peak Pursuits: The Emergence of Mountaineering in the Nineteenth Century
Book
Miriam L. Kingsberg Kadia;
(2019)
Into the Field: Human Scientists of Transwar Japan
Article
Vetter, Jeremy;
(2008)
Cowboys, Scientists, and Fossils: The Field Site and Local Collaboration in the American West
Article
Seguin, Eve;
(2000)
Bloor, Latour, and the field
Article
Hess, David J.;
(2004)
Health, the Environment and Social Movements
Article
Kati Kish Bar-On;
(2024)
Mathematics and society reunited: The social aspects of Brouwer's intuitionism
Article
Heinz-Peter Schmiedebach;
(2024)
Parteigänger, Kollaborateure, Abtrünnige? Anmerkungen zur Analyse von Handlungsmöglichkeiten von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern im Nationalsozialismus (Party supporters, collaborators, renegades? Notes on the analysis of scientists' options for action under National Socialism)
Be the first to comment!