Richards, Robert John (Advisor)
Ling, Biying (Author)
This dissertation explores how “quantity” was reconceptualized in the context of 19th century experimental sciences. In canonical works of philosophy by Aristotle, Descartes or Kant, “quantity” serves as the link between mathematics and its application in the empirical domain. The conception that “quantities” are composed out of equal, additive units is based on the archetypical geometrical magnitudes and its part-whole structure. Despite the fact that measurement techniques in most experimental sciences involve much more complex conceptual and practical operations than counting units, the old conception of “quantity” continued to play a crucial role in philosophers and scientists’ attempt to explain how mathematics is applied well into the 19th century. In the second half of the 19th century, philosophically minded scientists shifted their attention away from defining the generalized “quantity” to reflecting on the methods and foundation of the measurement process. As they incorporated considerations of experimental work into their philosophical thinking, they highlighted the role of measurement operations, instruments, and the underlying hypotheses and laws in constituting the meaning of every quantitative concept. Even length and time—the most elementary quantities known to mankind—are not a priori quantitative, but rest on certain assumptions underlying the measurement process carried over from experience. This shift of attention led to the disappearance of “quantity” with a fixed, generalized definition from philosophical writings concerning measurement from late 19th century onward.
...More
Article
Luiz Carlos Soares;
(2017)
John Banks: An Independent and Itinerant Lecturer of Natural and Experimental Philosophy at the Threshold of the English Industrial Revolution
Article
Cobb, Aaron D.;
(2009)
Michael Faraday's “Historical Sketch of Electro-Magnetism” and the Theory-Dependence of Experimentation
Article
Bullynck, Maarten;
(2010)
Johann Heinrich Lambert's Scientific Tool Kit, Exemplified by His Measurement of Humidity, 1769--1772
Chapter
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni;
(2007)
Experiment in Newton's Principia: The First Edition
Article
Yaël Nazé;
(2014)
Structure de l’univers. Quand l’observation guide la théorie… ou pas
Article
Sim-Hui Tee;
(2019)
Fictional experimental modeling in biology: In vivo representation
Article
S. Andrew Inkpen;
(2016)
Like Hercules and the Hydra: Trade-offs and strategies in ecological model-building and experimental design
Thesis
Rolloff, Sylvia Alexis;
(2010)
Explanatory Models in Behavioral Endocrinology
Article
Tudor M. Baetu;
(2024)
Extrapolating animal consciousness
Article
Michell, Joel;
(2006)
Psychophysics, Intensive Magnitudes, and the Psychometricians' Fallacy
Article
Klaus Ruthenberg;
Hasok Chang;
(2017)
Acidity: Modes of Characterization and Quantification
Article
Harro Maas;
(2020)
Monitoring the self: François-Marc-Louis Naville and his moral tables
Article
H. Otto Sibum;
(2020)
When is enough enough? Accurate measurement and the integrity of scientific research
Article
Jean-Pierre Llored;
(2021)
Chemistry and Measurement: Some Philosophical Lessons
Article
Joan Steigerwald;
(2016)
Entanglements of instruments and media in investigating organic life
Chapter
Sibum, H. Otto;
(2008)
Experience-Experiments: The Changing Experiential Basis of Physics
Article
Chassé, Daniel Speich;
(2014)
Was zählt der Preis? Dogmengeschichte und Wissensgeschichte der Ökonomie
Article
Fenneke Sysling;
(2020)
Measurement, self-tracking and the history of science: An introduction
Article
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2001)
On the Virtues and Disadvantage of Quantification for Democratic Life
Chapter
Tousignant, Noemi;
(2014)
A Quantity of Suffering: Measuring Pain as Emotion in the Mid-Twentieth Century United States
Be the first to comment!