Bickford, Andrew (Author)
All militaries try to develop a “winning edge” in warfare. More often than not these attempts focus on new weapons systems and weapons platforms, on new ways of maximizing the offensive capabilities of a military through firepower. These attempts can also involve the training and development of soldiers, including performance enhancements to make them fight better, longer, and smarter than the enemy and to counter human frailty on the battlefield. These concerns and problems have long held the interest of the U.S. military. This article traces the development, rationale, and legacy of one such attempt to deal with human frailty and the “body problem,” a kind of military futurism devised at the peak of the Cold War. Dr. Marion Sulzberger envisioned creating soldiers who had their own kind of special “biological armor,” or what he termed “idiophylaxis.” In 1962, he presented a paper at the Army Science Conference at West Point titled “Progress and Prospects in Idiophylaxis (Built-In Individual Self-Protection of the Combat Soldier).” Sulzberger's call was for a radical rethinking of the combat soldier and the ways in which soldiers were imagined, designed, and developed. His goal was to “armor” the individual soldier both internally and psychologically through new forms of biomedicine and biotechnology. The interventions he detailed in 1962 live on today in the U.S. military's soldier performance enhancement research programs, including DARPA's recent “Inner Armor” program and desire to make “kill-proof” soldiers.
...More
Article
Jayne Elliott;
(2022)
Posted to Germany: Early Cold War Canadian Military Policy and Its Impact on One Family’s Experience
Book
Andrew Bickford;
(2021)
Chemical Heroes: Pharmacological Supersoldiers in the US Military
Book
Matthew S. Wiseman;
(2024)
Frontier Science: Northern Canada, Military Research, and the Cold War, 1945–1970
Article
Tom L. Beauchamp;
(2020)
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report
Book
Meghan Fitzpatrick;
(2017)
Invisible Scars: Mental Trauma and the Korean War
Book
Jayakanth Srinivasan;
Christopher Ivany;
(2021)
Helping Soldiers Heal: How the US Army Created a Learning Mental Health Care System
Thesis
Evan P. Sullivan;
(2020)
Making Good: World War I, Disability, and the Senses in American Rehabilitation
Article
Joseph M Gabriel;
Sukumar P Desai;
(2023)
“The Warmth of His Continuing Interest”: Henry K. Beecher, the Bioethics Revolution, and Pharmaceutical Industry Funding of Academic Medical Science in Cold War America
Book
Brian E. Crim;
(2018)
Our Germans: Project Paperclip and the National Security State
Article
Krementsov, Nikolai;
(2007)
In the Shadow of the Bomb: U.S.-Soviet Biomedical Relations in the Early Cold War, 1944--1948
Article
Yoshio Nukaga;
(2019)
Development of the Hybrid Rule and the Concept of Justice: The Selection of Subjects in Biomedical Research
Article
Søren Holm;
(2020)
Belmont in Europe: A Mostly Indirect Influence
Article
Franklin G. Miller;
(2020)
Revisiting the Distinction and the Connection Between Research and Practice
Article
Franklin G. Miller;
Jonathan Kimmelman;
(2020)
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report
Thesis
M. Sadegh Foghani;
(2018)
Ayatollahs and Embryos: Science, Politics, and Religion in Post-Revolutionary Iran
Book
Sydney A. Halpern;
(2021)
Dangerous Medicine: The Story behind Human Experiments with Hepatitis
Article
Grant Fisher;
(2023)
Practical pursuit in stem cell biology: Innovation, translation, and incomplete theorization
Article
Colin A Ross;
(2017)
LSD experiments by the United States Army
Book
Naomi Oreskes;
(2021)
Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don’t Know about the Ocean
Book
Evelyne Samama;
(2017)
La médecine de guerre en Grèce ancienne
Be the first to comment!