IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB920652229

From Idiophylaxis to Inner Armor: Imagining the Self-Armoring Soldier in the United States Military from the 1960s to Today (2018)

Comparative Studies in Society and History
Volume: 60
Issue: 4
Pages: 810-838
Publication date: 2018
Language: English

URI: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history/article/from-idiophylaxis-to-inner-armor-imagining-the-selfarmoring-soldier-in-the-united-states-military-from-the-1960s-to-today/CB54E968052BCF7EC2FD508A25575F41

DOI: 10.1017/S0010417518000300

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Cold War Medicine and the military; medicine in war Soldiers Military research Biology and ethics; bioethics Biomedicine 20th century, late United States

All militaries try to develop a “winning edge” in warfare. More often than not these attempts focus on new weapons systems and weapons platforms, on new ways of maximizing the offensive capabilities of a military through firepower. These attempts can also involve the training and development of soldiers, including performance enhancements to make them fight better, longer, and smarter than the enemy and to counter human frailty on the battlefield. These concerns and problems have long held the interest of the U.S. military. This article traces the development, rationale, and legacy of one such attempt to deal with human frailty and the “body problem,” a kind of military futurism devised at the peak of the Cold War. Dr. Marion Sulzberger envisioned creating soldiers who had their own kind of special “biological armor,” or what he termed “idiophylaxis.” In 1962, he presented a paper at the Army Science Conference at West Point titled “Progress and Prospects in Idiophylaxis (Built-In Individual Self-Protection of the Combat Soldier).” Sulzberger's call was for a radical rethinking of the combat soldier and the ways in which soldiers were imagined, designed, and developed. His goal was to “armor” the individual soldier both internally and psychologically through new forms of biomedicine and biotechnology. The interventions he detailed in 1962 live on today in the U.S. military's soldier performance enhancement research programs, including DARPA's recent “Inner Armor” program and desire to make “kill-proof” soldiers.

...More

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB920652229

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Jayne Elliott; (2022)
Posted to Germany: Early Cold War Canadian Military Policy and Its Impact on One Family’s Experience (/p/isis/citation/CBB591798079/)

Book Andrew Bickford; (2021)
Chemical Heroes: Pharmacological Supersoldiers in the US Military (/p/isis/citation/CBB049126185/)

Article Tom L. Beauchamp; (2020)
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report (/p/isis/citation/CBB975056514/)

Book Meghan Fitzpatrick; (2017)
Invisible Scars: Mental Trauma and the Korean War (/p/isis/citation/CBB810752603/)

Thesis Evan P. Sullivan; (2020)
Making Good: World War I, Disability, and the Senses in American Rehabilitation (/p/isis/citation/CBB655397421/)

Article Joseph M Gabriel; Sukumar P Desai; (2023)
“The Warmth of His Continuing Interest”: Henry K. Beecher, the Bioethics Revolution, and Pharmaceutical Industry Funding of Academic Medical Science in Cold War America (/p/isis/citation/CBB000270765/)

Book Brian E. Crim; (2018)
Our Germans: Project Paperclip and the National Security State (/p/isis/citation/CBB389750546/)

Article Krementsov, Nikolai; (2007)
In the Shadow of the Bomb: U.S.-Soviet Biomedical Relations in the Early Cold War, 1944--1948 (/p/isis/citation/CBB001030407/)

Article Yoshio Nukaga; (2019)
Development of the Hybrid Rule and the Concept of Justice: The Selection of Subjects in Biomedical Research (/p/isis/citation/CBB412625723/)

Article Søren Holm; (2020)
Belmont in Europe: A Mostly Indirect Influence (/p/isis/citation/CBB647472223/)

Thesis M. Sadegh Foghani; (2018)
Ayatollahs and Embryos: Science, Politics, and Religion in Post-Revolutionary Iran (/p/isis/citation/CBB063043602/)

Article Franklin G. Miller; (2020)
Revisiting the Distinction and the Connection Between Research and Practice (/p/isis/citation/CBB749659220/)

Article Franklin G. Miller; Jonathan Kimmelman; (2020)
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report (/p/isis/citation/CBB685361978/)

Book Sydney A. Halpern; (2021)
Dangerous Medicine: The Story behind Human Experiments with Hepatitis (/p/isis/citation/CBB697182722/)

Article Grant Fisher; (2023)
Practical pursuit in stem cell biology: Innovation, translation, and incomplete theorization (/p/isis/citation/CBB484096816/)

Article Colin A Ross; (2017)
LSD experiments by the United States Army (/p/isis/citation/CBB313699629/)

Book Naomi Oreskes; (2021)
Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don’t Know about the Ocean (/p/isis/citation/CBB027037258/)

Book Evelyne Samama; (2017)
La médecine de guerre en Grèce ancienne (/p/isis/citation/CBB201640098/)

Book Rebecca Ayako Bennette; (2020)
Diagnosing Dissent: Hysterics, Deserters, and Conscientious Objectors in Germany During World War One (/p/isis/citation/CBB592428650/)

Article Jennifer Farquharson; (2018)
Health and hierarchy: soldiers, civilians and mental healthcare in Scotland, 1914–34 (/p/isis/citation/CBB324761166/)