IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB838457906

‘The Great Fiasco’ of the 1948 Presidential Election Polls: Status Recognition and Norms Conflict in Social Science (2018)

Annals of Science: The History of Science and Technology
Volume: 75
Issue: 2
Pages: 120-144
Publication date: 2018
Language: English

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2018.1466194

DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2018.1466194

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Social sciences Science and politics Elections 20th century United States Social Science Research Council National Science Foundation (U.S.)

All three ‘scientific’ pollsters (Crossley, Gallup and Roper) wrongly predicted incumbent President Harry Truman’s defeat in the 1948 presidential election, and thus faced a potentially serious legitimacy crisis. This ‘fiasco’ occurred at a most inopportune time. Social science was embroiled in a policy debate taking place in the halls of Congress. It was fighting a losing battle to be included, along with the natural sciences, in the National Science Foundation, for which legislation was being drafted. Faced with the failure of the polls, the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) intervened quickly to prevent social science’s adversaries from using this event to degrade further its status. After all, many social scientists considered the sample survey as the paramount tool of social research, and sampling as one of social science’s greatest innovation. Concurrently, there was an ongoing conflict among polling practitioners themselves—between advocates of probability sampling and users of quotas, like the pollsters. The SSRC committee appointed to evaluate the polling debacle managed to keep this contentious issue of sampling from becoming the centre of attention. Given the inauspicious environment in which this event happened, the SSRC did not wish to advertise the fact that the house of social science was in turmoil.

...More

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB838457906

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Solovey, Mark; (2004)
Riding Natural Scientists' Coattails onto the Endless Frontier: The SSRC and the Quest for Scientific Legitimacy (/p/isis/citation/CBB000671316/)

Article Lusinchi, Dominic; (2012)
“President” Landon and the 1936 Literary Digest Poll: Were Automobile and Telephone Owners to Blame? (/p/isis/citation/CBB001231849/)

Book Solovey, Mark; (2013)
Shaky Foundations: The Politics--Patronage--Social Science Nexus in Cold War America (/p/isis/citation/CBB001550276/)

Book Solovey, Mark; (2013)
Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America (/p/isis/citation/CBB001420023/)

Book Fisher, Donald; (1993)
Fundamental development of the social sciences: Rockefeller philanthropy and the United States Social Science Research Council (/p/isis/citation/CBB000038563/)

Article King, Desmond; (1997)
Creating a funding regime for social research in Britain: The Heyworth Committee on Social Studies and the founding of the Social Science Research Council (/p/isis/citation/CBB000074333/)

Article Gottlieb, Robert; (2009)
The Next Environmentalism: How Movements Respond to the Changes that Elections Bring---From Nixon to Obama (/p/isis/citation/CBB000932638/)

Article Phillips, Christopher J.; (2014)
In Accordance with a “More Majestic Order”: The New Math and the Nature of Mathematics at Midcentury (/p/isis/citation/CBB001451294/)

Thesis Gallo, Jason; (2008)
Speaking of Science: The Role of the National Science Foundation in the Development of United States Information Infrastructure (/p/isis/citation/CBB001561196/)

Thesis Gauchat, Gordon; (2010)
The Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere (/p/isis/citation/CBB001567226/)

Article Emily Hauptmann; (2016)
“Propagandists for the Behavioral Sciences”: The Overlooked Partnership Between the Carnegie Corporation and SSRC in the Mid-Twentieth Century (/p/isis/citation/CBB136627315/)

Book Bob Withers; (2017)
The President Travels by Train: Politics and Pullmans (/p/isis/citation/CBB777783760/)

Article Mata, Tiago; Scheiding, Tom; (2012)
National Science Foundation Patronage of Social Science, 1970s and 1980s: Congressional Scrutiny, Advocacy Network, and the Prestige of Economics (/p/isis/citation/CBB001211967/)

Book Mark Solovey; (2020)
Social Science for What?: Battles over Public Funding for the "Other Sciences" at the National Science Foundation (/p/isis/citation/CBB950238763/)

Book Cravens, Hamilton; (2004)
The Social Sciences Go to Washington: The Politics of Knowledge in the Postmodern Age (/p/isis/citation/CBB000640897/)

Article Gunnell, John G.; (2013)
The Reconstitution of Political Theory: David Easton, Behavioralism, and the Long Road to System (/p/isis/citation/CBB001320229/)

Article Poirier, Maben Walter; (2011)
Michael Polanyi and the Social Sciences (/p/isis/citation/CBB001034407/)

Book Jackson, John P.; (2001)
Social Scientists for Social Justice: Making the Case against Segregation (/p/isis/citation/CBB000201428/)

Article Stapleford, Thomas A.; (2010)
Shaping Knowledge about American Labor: External Advising at the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Twentieth Century (/p/isis/citation/CBB001034634/)

Book Ekbladh, David; (2010)
The Great American Mission: Modernization and the Construction of an American World Order (/p/isis/citation/CBB001421567/)