Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing (2022)
Christian H. Ross (Author)
Spontaneous Generations
Volume: 10
Issue: 1
Pages: 63-87
Publication date: 2022
Language: English
The place of scientific expertise in democracy has become increasingly disputed, raising question who ought to have a say in decision-making about science and technology, with what authority, and for what reasons. Public engagement has become a common refrain in technoscientific discussions to address tensions in the rightful roles of experts and the public in democratic decision-making. However, precisely what public engagement entails, who it involves, how it is performed, and to what extent it is desirable for democratic societies remain contested matters. Nevertheless, strong commitments to greater public engagement in the governance of science and technology persist. This essay examines expert discussions about heritable human genome editing beginning from the 2015 International Summit on Human Genome Editing through the controversies surrounding of the first CRISPR-edited humans in late 2018 and the subsequent renewed calls for a moratorium on heritable human genome editing. I examine these discussions as example cases in which the right relations among experts, the public, and technoscientific decision-making are actively reconfigured. I argue that rather than expanding the range of included stakeholders, public engagement serves as an enabling handservant of technocracy that reinforces the position of scientific experts in decision-making as both epistemic and normative authorities.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Thesis
Christian H. Ross;
(2021)
Editing Engagement: Visions of Science, Democracy, and Responsibility in Gene Editing Discourse
Article
Monamie Bhadra Haines;
(February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India
Article
Hiro Saito;
(January 2021)
The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan
Article
Andrew J. Hogan;
(2016)
From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering
Article
Alyssa Botelho;
(2021)
The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy
Article
Morgan Meyer;
(2022)
Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility: Controversies in human gene editing
Book
John H. Evans;
(2020)
The Human Gene Editing Debate
Article
Henry M. Cowles;
Chitra Ramalingam;
(2022)
Introduction
Article
Harry Collins;
Robert Evans;
Martin Weinel;
(August 2017)
STS as science or politics?
Article
Harry Collins;
Robert Evans;
Weinel;
(August 2016)
STS as science or politics?
Article
Sergio Sismondo;
(August 2017)
Casting a wider net: A reply to Collins, Evans and Weinel
Article
Mott Greene;
(2022)
Experts, Managerialism, and Democratic Theory
Article
Stephen John;
(2022)
The Two Virtues of Science
Book
Gil Eyal;
(2019)
The Crisis of Expertise
Article
Shobita Parthasarathy;
(2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser
Article
Hiroko Kumaki;
(2024)
Intra-mediary expertise: Trans-science and expert understanding of the public
Book
Lee McIntyre;
(2021)
How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason
Article
Melanie Leenen;
Bart Penders;
(October 2016)
Dissident Dietary Credibility: The Power of Discontent
Article
Nina Frahm;
Tess Doezema;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission
Article
Durant, Darrin;
(October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science
Be the first to comment!