IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB828766557

Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing (2022)

Christian H. Ross (Author)

Spontaneous Generations
Volume: 10
Issue: 1
Pages: 63-87
Publication date: 2022
Language: English

DOI: 10.4245/spongen.v10i1.38201

URI: https://spontaneousgenerations.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/article/view/38201

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Democracy Public understanding of science CRISPR-Cas9 Genetic engineering Science and technology studies (STS) Expertise Authorities; experts Authority of science 21st century

The place of scientific expertise in democracy has become increasingly disputed, raising question who ought to have a say in decision-making about science and technology, with what authority, and for what reasons. Public engagement has become a common refrain in technoscientific discussions to address tensions in the rightful roles of experts and the public in democratic decision-making. However, precisely what public engagement entails, who it involves, how it is performed, and to what extent it is desirable for democratic societies remain contested matters. Nevertheless, strong commitments to greater public engagement in the governance of science and technology persist. This essay examines expert discussions about heritable human genome editing beginning from the 2015 International Summit on Human Genome Editing through the controversies surrounding of the first CRISPR-edited humans in late 2018 and the subsequent renewed calls for a moratorium on heritable human genome editing. I examine these discussions as example cases in which the right relations among experts, the public, and technoscientific decision-making are actively reconfigured. I argue that rather than expanding the range of included stakeholders, public engagement serves as an enabling handservant of technocracy that reinforces the position of scientific experts in decision-making as both epistemic and normative authorities.

...More

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB828766557

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Thesis Christian H. Ross; (2021)
Editing Engagement: Visions of Science, Democracy, and Responsibility in Gene Editing Discourse (/p/isis/citation/CBB263669907/)

Article Monamie Bhadra Haines; (February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India (/p/isis/citation/CBB710438620/)

Article Hiro Saito; (January 2021)
The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan (/p/isis/citation/CBB786983437/)

Article Andrew J. Hogan; (2016)
From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering (/p/isis/citation/CBB750225154/)

Article Alyssa Botelho; (2021)
The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy (/p/isis/citation/CBB000261857/)

Article Morgan Meyer; (2022)
Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility: Controversies in human gene editing (/p/isis/citation/CBB072011815/)

Book John H. Evans; (2020)
The Human Gene Editing Debate (/p/isis/citation/CBB424000521/)

Article Henry M. Cowles; Chitra Ramalingam; (2022)
Introduction (/p/isis/citation/CBB356636672/)

Article Harry Collins; Robert Evans; Martin Weinel; (August 2017)
STS as science or politics? (/p/isis/citation/CBB939789883/)

Article Harry Collins; Robert Evans; Weinel; (August 2016)
STS as science or politics? (/p/isis/citation/CBB795627192/)

Article Sergio Sismondo; (August 2017)
Casting a wider net: A reply to Collins, Evans and Weinel (/p/isis/citation/CBB445744492/)

Article Mott Greene; (2022)
Experts, Managerialism, and Democratic Theory (/p/isis/citation/CBB659481305/)

Article Stephen John; (2022)
The Two Virtues of Science (/p/isis/citation/CBB589589263/)

Book Gil Eyal; (2019)
The Crisis of Expertise (/p/isis/citation/CBB193528078/)

Article Shobita Parthasarathy; (2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser (/p/isis/citation/CBB968694595/)

Article Nina Frahm; Tess Doezema; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission (/p/isis/citation/CBB550648723/)

Article Durant, Darrin; (October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science (/p/isis/citation/CBB562394056/)

Book Lee McIntyre; (2021)
How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason (/p/isis/citation/CBB702116961/)

Article Melanie Leenen; Bart Penders; (October 2016)
Dissident Dietary Credibility: The Power of Discontent (/p/isis/citation/CBB229041974/)

Article Clarissa Ai Ling Lee; (2023)
Managing ‘Wicked’ Technoscientific Problems: The Postnormal Science of Risk Narratives (/p/isis/citation/CBB747521102/)