Ernst Mach’s definition of the relationship between thoughts and facts is well known, but the question of how Mach conceived of their actual relationship has received much less attention. This paper aims to address this gap in light of Mary B. Hesse’s view of a postempiricist approach to natural science. As this paper will show, this view is characterized by a constructivist conception of the relationship between theory and facts that seems to be consistent with Mach’s observations on scientific knowledge. The paper first explores Hesse’s account of postempiricism and her project of a new epistemology. It then considers Ernst Mach’s conception of facts as the middle term of a triad of concepts that includes thoughts and elements as extreme terms. Finally, the paper will offer concluding remarks on Mach’s contribution to the debate on scientific realism and his attempt to redefine the notions of correspondence and objectivity in science.
...More
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Cardellini, Liberato;
(2008)
The Views and Influence of Ernst Von Glasersfeld: An Introduction
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000930622/)
Chapter
Zittel, Claus;
(2010)
The Politics of Cognition: Genesis and Development of Ludwik Fleck's “Comparative Epistemology”
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001023239/)
Book
Evandro Agazzi;
(2014)
Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts
(/p/isis/citation/CBB896368292/)
Article
Inkeri Koskinen;
(2020)
Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity
(/p/isis/citation/CBB110063225/)
Article
Kabir S. Bakshi;
(2023)
Clarifying some misconceptions in interpreting Ernst Mach's views on thought experiments
(/p/isis/citation/CBB777487728/)
Article
Brakel, Jaap van;
(2013)
František Wald's Empiricism
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001320765/)
Chapter
Paolo Parrini;
(2018)
Ernst Mach and the Disenchantment of Metaphysics
(/p/isis/citation/CBB153044104/)
Chapter
Pietro Gori;
(2018)
Ernst Mach dal punto di vista storico-critico
(/p/isis/citation/CBB020210950/)
Book
Pietro Gori;
(2018)
Ernst Mach: tra scienza e filosofia
(/p/isis/citation/CBB991429309/)
Chapter
Susanna Zellini;
(2018)
Wittgenstein, Mach e il senso comune
(/p/isis/citation/CBB902592785/)
Book
John Preston;
(2021)
Interpreting Mach: Critical Essays
(/p/isis/citation/CBB070616818/)
Chapter
Arabatzis, Theodore;
(2012)
Hidden Entities and Experimental Practice: Renewing the Dialogue Between History and Philosophy of Science
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001500247/)
Book
Latour, Bruno;
(2010)
On the Cult of the Factish Gods
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001023108/)
Article
Pietro Daniel Omodeo;
(2020)
The Struggle for Objectivity: Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology
(/p/isis/citation/CBB011713085/)
Article
Siemsen, H.;
(2010)
The Psychophysiological Founding of the Analogy Concept by Ernst Mach
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001232293/)
Article
Wulz, Monika;
(2015)
Gedankenexperimente im ökonomischen Überschuss. Wissenschaft und Ökonomie bei Ernst Mach
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001551246/)
Thesis
Charak, Gregory Scott;
(2007)
Between Soul and Precision: Ernst Mach's Biological Empiricism and the SocialDemocratic Philosophy of Science
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001561367/)
Article
Elske de Waal;
Sjang L. ten Hagen;
(2020)
The Concept of Fact in German Physics around 1900: A Comparison between Mach and Einstein
(/p/isis/citation/CBB266214579/)
Article
Siemsen, Hayo;
(2010)
The Mach-Planck Debate Revisited: Democratization of Science or Elite Knowledge?
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001034670/)
Be the first to comment!