Davies, Sarah R. (Author)
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Volume: 43
Issue: 2
Pages: 171-197
Publication date: March 2018
Language: English
The rise of a “maker movement,” located in hacker and makerspaces and involving the democratization of technologies of production and support of grassroots innovation, is receiving increasing attention from science and technology studies (STS) scholarship. This article explores how hacking is characterized by users of hacker and makerspaces and relates this to broader discussion of the maker movement as, for instance, promoting innovation, engaged in countercultural critique, or as accessible to anyone. Based on an interview study of users of twelve hacker and makerspaces across the United States, it argues that for these users, hacking is not about politics, commercial innovation, or critique. Rather, it is understood as a lifestyle one subscribes to, a meaningful leisure activity, or as providing access to a welcoming and close-knit community. Contrary to expectations of the maker movement as heralding social change, the benefits of hacking were viewed as personal rather than political, economic, or social; similarly, democratization of technology was experienced as rather incidental to most hackers’ and makers’ experiences.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Nina Frahm;
Tess Doezema;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission
Article
Chris Tennant;
Jack Stilgoe;
(December 2021)
The attachments of ‘autonomous’ vehicles
Article
Owen Marshall;
(2022)
Un-silencing an Experimental Technique: Listening to the Electrical Penetration Graph
Article
Silvia Lindtner;
(September 2015)
Hacking with Chinese Characteristics: The Promises of the Maker Movement against China’s Manufacturing Culture
Book
Silvia M. Lindtner;
(2020)
Prototype Nation: China and the Contested Promise of Innovation
Book
Kenneth Cohen;
(2020)
They Will Have Their Game: Sporting Culture and the Making of the Early American Republic
Article
Karl Grindal;
(2022)
Artist Collectives as the Origins of DDoS the Strano Network and Electronic Disturbance Theater
Article
Michael Lachney;
Ellen K. Foster;
(2020)
Historicizing Making and Doing: Seymour Papert, Sherry Turkle, and Epistemological Foundations of the Maker Movement
Article
Nina Klimburg-Witjes;
Alexander Wentland;
(November 2021)
Hacking Humans? Social Engineering and the Construction of the “Deficient User” in Cybersecurity Discourses
Article
Lucas Lemos;
Chris Giotitsas;
(2021)
Can Communities Produce Complex Technology? Looking Into Space for Insight
Article
Marlous E. Arentshorst;
Tjard de Cock Buning;
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse;
(2016)
Exploring Responsible Neuroimaging Innovation: Visions From a Societal Actor Perspective
Article
Sara Giordano;
(May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics
Article
Monamie Bhadra Haines;
(February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
Article
Michael Lynch;
(August 2017)
STS, symmetry and post-truth
Article
Harry Collins;
Robert Evans;
Martin Weinel;
(August 2017)
STS as science or politics?
Article
Noela Invernizzi;
(2020)
Public participation and democratization: Effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
Article
Victor Seow;
Sean Hsiang-lin Lei;
(2022)
Who Is Mr. Science and Why Does He Matter?
Book
Christopher M. Kelty;
(2020)
The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories
Article
Irwin, Alan;
Jensen, Torben Elgaard;
Jones, Kevin E.;
(February 2013)
The good, the bad and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice
Be the first to comment!