IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB596202361

The National Science Foundation and philosophy of science's withdrawal from social concerns (2019)

Vaesen, Krist (Author)
Joel Katzav (Author)

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume: 78
Pages: 73-82
Publication date: 2019
Language: English

URI: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936811830116X

DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.01.001

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Science and ideology Positivism Values (philosophy) Privately sponsored science; philanthropy Philosophy of science 20th century, late National Science Foundation (U.S.)

At some point during the 1950s, mainstream American philosophy of science began increasingly to avoid questions about the role of non-cognitive values in science and, accordingly, increasingly to avoid active engagement with social, political and moral concerns. Such questions and engagement eventually ceased to be part of the mainstream. Here we show that the eventual dominance of ‘value-free’ philosophy of science can be attributed, at least in part, to the policies of the U.S. National Science Foundation's “History and Philosophy of Science” sub-program. In turn, the sub-program's policies were set by logical empiricists who espoused value-free philosophy of science; these philosophers' actions, we also point out, fit a broad pattern, one in which analytic philosophers used institutional control to marginalize rival approaches to philosophy. We go on to draw on existing knowledge of this pattern to suggest two further, similar, contributors to the withdrawal from value-laden philosophy of science, namely decisions by the editors of Philosophy of Science and by the editors of The Journal of Philosophy. Political climate was, we argue, at most an indirect contributor to the withdrawal and was neither a factor that decided whether it occurred nor one that was sufficient to bring it about. Moreover, we argue that the actions at the National Science Foundation went beyond what was required by its senior administrators and are better viewed as part of what drove, rather than as what was being driven by, the adoption of logical empiricism by the philosophy of science community.

...More

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB596202361

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Czernecki, Igor; (2013)
An Intellectual Offensive: The Ford Foundation and the Destalinization of the Polish Social Sciences (/p/isis/citation/CBB001213829/)

Article Roth Xavier; (2018)
When the Content to Be Taught Is a Norm: Canguilhem-Inspired Contributions to Educational Practices (/p/isis/citation/CBB543469377/)

Book Lacey, Hugh; (2005)
Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy about Transgenic Crops (/p/isis/citation/CBB000601025/)

Article Moti Mizrahi; (2020)
The Case Study Method in Philosophy of Science: An Empirical Study (/p/isis/citation/CBB052936786/)

Article Stephen John; (2019)
Science, truth and dictatorship: Wishful thinking or wishful speaking? (/p/isis/citation/CBB783750844/)

Article Hiroshi Ichikawa; (2019)
Materialist Perestroika of Quantum Dynamics and Soviet Ideology: Yakov Petrovich Terletskii (1912‒1993) (/p/isis/citation/CBB251482593/)

Chapter Cheng, Yinghong; (2013)
Ideology and Cosmology: Maoist Discussion on Physics and the Cultural Revolution (/p/isis/citation/CBB001320722/)

Book George A. Reisch; (2019)
The Politics of Paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, and the Cold War “Struggle for Men’s Minds” (/p/isis/citation/CBB213032534/)

Article Edgar, Scott; (2009)
Logical Empiricism, Politics, and Professionalism (/p/isis/citation/CBB001032856/)

Article Harold J. Cook; (2018)
Sciences and Economies in the Scientific Revolution: Concepts, Materials, and Commensurable Fragments (/p/isis/citation/CBB547530416/)

Book Kindi, Vasso P.; Arabatzis, Theodore; (2012)
Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited (/p/isis/citation/CBB001421709/)

Article Nakajima, Hideto; (2013)
Depoliticization or Americanization of Japanese Science Studies (/p/isis/citation/CBB001201359/)

Article Uebel, Thomas; (2009)
Knowing Who Your Friends Are: Aspects of the Politics of Logical Empiricism (/p/isis/citation/CBB001032854/)

Article Stump, David J.; (2009)
Pragmatism, Activism, and the Icy Slopes of Logic in George Reisch's Portrait of the Philosophy of Science as a Young Field (/p/isis/citation/CBB001032855/)

Article Alessandro Savorelli; (2010)
Galileo "positivista" (/p/isis/citation/CBB368144360/)

Article Mata, Tiago; Scheiding, Tom; (2012)
National Science Foundation Patronage of Social Science, 1970s and 1980s: Congressional Scrutiny, Advocacy Network, and the Prestige of Economics (/p/isis/citation/CBB001211967/)

Book Solovey, Mark; (2013)
Shaky Foundations: The Politics--Patronage--Social Science Nexus in Cold War America (/p/isis/citation/CBB001550276/)

Article Zhu, Jianhong; (2003)
Analysis on the Background to the Establishment of the National Science Foundation of the U. S. A. (/p/isis/citation/CBB000500424/)

Article Gallo, Jason; (2009)
The Discursive and Operational Foundations of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the History of the National Science Foundation (/p/isis/citation/CBB000932271/)

Article Abbate, Janet; (2010)
Privatizing the Internet: Competing Visions and Chaotic Events, 1987--1995 (/p/isis/citation/CBB001231740/)