Publics as Threats? Integrating Science and Technology Studies and Social Movement Studies (2015)
Hess, David J. (Author)
Science as Culture
Volume: 24
Issue: 1
Pages: 69-82
Publication date: 2015
Language: English
When government and industry elites respond to or anticipate public acceptance issues having to do with industrial innovation, they construct models of the public that have variously been described as imaginaries, discourses, and frames. Because publics are sometimes mobilized in opposition to new technologies, opportunities emerge for bridging science and technology studies and social movement studies. Methodological and conceptual challenges for such syntheses are discussed. First, it is important to disaggregate categories of the public, industrial and political elites, and imaginaries (e.g. as threats, sources of innovation, or legitimate concerns). One solution is to use flexible typologies of the relations, such as industrial opposition movements, justice movements, alternative industrial movements, and regime preservation movements. Second, there is sometimes a tendency for the cultural analysis of imaginaries or discourses to utilize all-encompassing cultural logics and culturalism and to reject nomothetic inquiry, and alternatives are discussed.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Charlotte Biltekoff;
Julie Guthman;
(2023)
Conscious, Complacent, Fearful: Agri-Food Tech’s Market-Making Public Imaginaries
Article
Jonathan Tollefson;
(2020)
Post-Fukushima discourse in the US press: Quantified knowledge, the technical object, and a panicked public
Article
Sara Heidenreich;
(2016)
Out of Sight, out of Mind? Controversy over Offshore Wind Energy in Norway's News Media
Article
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.;
Silva, Carol L.;
Herron, Kerry G.;
Trousset, Sarah R.;
Rechard, Rob P.;
(Summer 2012)
Enhancing the Acceptability and Credibility of a Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel
Book
Robert P. Crease;
(2022)
The Leak: Politics, Activists, and Loss of Trust at Brookhaven National Laboratory
Article
James Bingaman;
Paul R. Brewer;
Ashley Paintsil;
David C. Wilson;
(2021)
“Siri, Show Me Scary Images of AI”: Effects of Text-Based Frames and Visuals on Support for Artificial Intelligence
Article
Pru Hobson-West;
Ashley Davies;
(July 2018)
Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice
Article
Jason Chilvers;
Matthew Kearnes;
(2020)
Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy
Article
Allison Marsh;
Bethany Johnson;
(2020)
Crash Course History of Science: Popular Science for General Education?
Article
Rony Armon;
Ayelet Baram-Tsabari;
(2016)
Our Findings, My Method: Framing Science in Televised Interviews
Article
Rebekah Higgitt;
(2017)
Challenging Tropes: Genius, Heroic Invention, and the Longitude Problem in the Museum
Article
Loleen Berdahl;
Maureen Bourassa;
Scott Bell;
Jana Fried;
(June 2016)
Exploring Perceptions of Credible Science Among Policy Stakeholder Groups: Results of Focus Group Discussions About Nuclear Energy
Chapter
Mikihito Tanaka;
(2015)
Agenda Building Intervention of Socio-Scientific Issues: A Science Media Centre of Japan Perspective
Article
Farquhar, Judith;
Rajan, Kaushik Sunder;
(2014)
Introduction: “Knowledge/Value”
Article
Rachel Hill;
(2023)
Cover Essay: Stamping Soviet Cosmonauts, Craft, and Cosmos
Article
Nielsen, Kristian H.;
Balling, Gert;
Hope, Tom;
Nakamura, Masaki;
(2015)
Sipping Science: The Interpretative Flexibility of Science Cafés in Denmark and Japan
Article
Ulrike Felt;
Simone Schumann;
Claudia G. Schwarz;
(2015)
(Re)assembling Natures, Cultures, and (Nano)technologies in Public Engagement
Article
Terzian, Sevan G.;
(2015)
Corporate Science Education: Westinghouse and the Value of Science in Mid-Twentieth Century America
Book
Cardoso de Matos, Ana;
Gouzévitch, Irina;
C., Lourenço Mart;
Lourenço, Marta C.;
(2010)
Expositions universelles, musées techniques et société industrielle
Article
Stevienna de Saille;
(2015)
Dis-inviting the Unruly Public
Be the first to comment!