IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB548068287

Bioveillance: A Techno-security Infrastructure to Preempt the Dangers of Informationalised Biology (2020)

Hester, Rebecca J. (Author)

Science as Culture
Volume: 29
Issue: 1
Pages: 153-176
Publication date: 2020
Language: English

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2019.1705270

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1705270

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Cyberinfrastructure Biology Technology and society Science and technology studies (STS) Biology and ethics; bioethics Security technologies Surveillance 21st century United States

In 2011, a number of controversial experiments were conducted on the H5N1 flu virus. While the experiments illuminated growing biosecurity concerns regarding gain-of-function research, the controversy also signaled an evolving biosecurity threat landscape in which biological information, understood to be a latent and potential form of biological life, and the digital infrastructures that circulate this information, have also come to be seen as dangerous. This new threat landscape is informed by the technological framing of biological life as code. What kinds of biosecurity practices are called for when biological life is understood as code and what are the implications for life itself of developing such security practices? The United States has developed a techno-security infrastructure, which this article calls ‘bioveillance,’ in response to the dangers of mobile and mutable biological information. Collapsing biosecurity and cybersecurity into the emerging field of cyberbiosecurity and mirroring the networked life forms that it intends to prevent from proliferating, bioveillance is a vital component in a burgeoning global techno-security culture. The fact that biological life is not a code or information in any strict sense means that bioveillance will face significant challenges in its implementation not least because by using digital technologies to manage the communicability of informationalised biology, bioveillance also produces and proliferates that which it aims to forestall. This means that the more U.S. institutions do to generate biological information for biosecurity purposes, the more bioinsecurities they risk producing. Bioveillance and biological danger become one in the same.

...More

Included in

Article Jutta Weber; Katrin M. Kämpf (2020) Technosecurity Cultures: Introduction. Science as Culture (pp. 1-10). unapi

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB548068287

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Silvan Pollozek; Jan-Hendrik Passoth; (2023)
Provisional by design: Frontex data infrastructures and the Europeanization of migration and border control (/p/isis/citation/CBB906319443/)

Article Evan Selinger; Darrin Durant; (2022)
Amazon’s Ring: Surveillance as a Slippery Slope Service (/p/isis/citation/CBB181826170/)

Article Katrin M. Kämpf; (2020)
Pedophilia Screening in Technosecurity Culture The Construction of Dangerous Sub-populations in the Name of Security (/p/isis/citation/CBB009060974/)

Article Darren Ellis; (2020)
Techno-Securitisation of Everyday Life and Cultures of Surveillance-Apatheia (/p/isis/citation/CBB734944273/)

Article Patrick Petit; (2020)
‘Everywhere Surveillance’: Global Surveillance Regimes as Techno-Securitization (/p/isis/citation/CBB181724884/)

Book Brian Hochman; (2022)
The Listeners: A History of Wiretapping in the United States (/p/isis/citation/CBB775086796/)

Book Ruha Benjamin; (2019)
Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life (/p/isis/citation/CBB021638267/)

Article Bruno Oliveira Martins; (2023)
Security knowledges: Circulation, control, and responsible research and innovation in EU border management (/p/isis/citation/CBB687707247/)

Article Lucy Suchman; Karolina Follis; Jutta Weber; (November 2017)
Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security: (Introduction) (/p/isis/citation/CBB721841161/)

Article David Armstrong; (February 2019)
The social life of data points: Antecedents of digital technologies (/p/isis/citation/CBB757557196/)

Article Philip Olson; Christine Labuski; (August 2018)
‘There’s always a [white] man in the loop’: The gendered and racialized politics of civilian drones (/p/isis/citation/CBB568832607/)

Book Mary F. E. Ebeling; (2022)
Afterlives of Data: Life and Debt under Capitalist Surveillance (/p/isis/citation/CBB663965321/)

Thesis Kim, Richard S.Y.; (2010)
Cyber-Surveillance: A Case Study in Policy and Development (/p/isis/citation/CBB001567169/)

Book Brian Jordan Jefferson; (2020)
Digitize and Punish: racial criminalization in the digital age (/p/isis/citation/CBB018434400/)

Article David Ribes; (2019)
STS, Meet Data Science, Once Again (/p/isis/citation/CBB739449022/)

Article Michelle Spektor; (2020)
Imagining the Biometric Future: Debates Over National Biometric Identification in Israel (/p/isis/citation/CBB868369028/)

Book Thomas S. Mullaney; Benjamin Peters; Mar Hicks; Kavita Philip; (2021)
Your Computer Is on Fire (/p/isis/citation/CBB159272535/)

Book Samuel Greengard; (2021)
The Internet of Things (/p/isis/citation/CBB874725102/)

Book Andrew J. Stewart; (2021)
A Vulnerable System: The History of Information Security in the Computer Age (/p/isis/citation/CBB486585682/)

Article David Skinner; (2020)
Race, Racism and Identification in the Era of Technosecurity (/p/isis/citation/CBB130537802/)