Who has the right to decide how nature is used, and in what ways? Recovering an overlooked thread of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century environmental thought, Erin Drew shows that English writers of the period commonly believed that human beings had only the "usufruct" of the earth—the "right of temporary possession, use, or enjoyment of the advantages of property belonging to another, so far as may be had without causing damage or prejudice." The belief that human beings had only temporary and accountable possession of the world, which Drew labels the "usufructuary ethos," had profound ethical implications for the ways in which the English conceived of the ethics of power and use. Drew’s book traces the usufructuary ethos from the religious and legal writings of the seventeenth century through mid-eighteenth-century poems of colonial commerce, attending to the particular political, economic, and environmental pressures that shaped, transformed, and ultimately sidelined it. Although a study of past ideas, The Usufructuary Ethos resonates with contemporary debates about our human responsibilities to the natural world in the face of climate change and mass extinction.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Antonello La Vergata;
(2023)
Images of the Economy of Nature, 1650-1930: From "Nature’s War" to Darwin’s "Struggle for Life"
Article
Laroche, Jacques;
(2008)
Sustainability and Ethics
Chapter
Sörlin, Sverker;
(2013)
Epilogue: Preservation in the Age of Entanglement: STS and the History of Future Urban Nature
Article
O'Brien, William E.;
Njambi, Wairim Ngar iya;
(2012)
Marginal Voices in “Wild” America: Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and “Nature” in The National Parks
Article
Cabin, Robert J.;
(2013)
Nature Is Dead. Long Live Nature!
Book
Drake, Brian Allen;
(2013)
Loving Nature, Fearing the State: Environmentalism and Antigovernment Politics before Reagan
Article
Martin Schneider;
(2022)
Die Grenzen des Wachstums und die Umweltbewegung. Warnung vor der vermeidbaren Katastrophe [The Limits to Growth and the Environmental Movement. Warning of the avoidable catastrophe]
Book
Dorceta E. Taylor;
(2016)
The Rise of the American Conservation Movement: Power, Privilege, and Environmental Protection
Book
Simone Schleper;
(2019)
Planning for the Planet: Environmental Expertise and the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 1960–1980
Book
Jared Farmer;
(2022)
Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees
Book
Ximo Guillem-Llobat;
Agustí Nieto-Galan;
(2020)
Tóxicos invisibles: La construcción de la ignorancia ambiental (Invisible toxins: The construction of environmental ignorance)
Book
Jennifer Ferng;
Lauren Jacobi;
(2023)
Land Air Sea: Architecture and Environment in the Early Modern Era
Article
Zachary Piso;
Viorel Pâslaru;
(2021)
Introduction to values and pluralism in the environmental sciences: From inferences to institutions
Book
Keith Makoto Woodhouse;
(2018)
The Ecocentrists: A History of Radical Environmentalism
Book
Jamie Lorimer;
(2015)
Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation After Nature
Article
Pin-Hsien Wu;
(2016)
Investigating nature within different discursive and ideological contexts: case studies of Chinese and Indian coal capitals
Article
Graney, Christopher M.;
(2011)
Contra Galileo: Riccioli's “Coriolis-Force” Argument on the Earth's Diurnal Rotation
Chapter
Barbara Raucci;
(2009)
In Napoli MDCCLXVI: famose dottrine, ingannevoli sensi, ignaro vulgo, intorno al moto del Terracqueo Globo
Book
Unger, Nancy C.;
(2012)
Beyond Nature's Housekeepers: American Women in Environmental History
Book
Christina Rae Butler;
(2020)
Lowcountry at High Tide: A History of Flooding, Drainage, and Reclamation in Charleston, South Carolina
Be the first to comment!