Thesis ID: CBB464558804

Drawing on Darwinism: Rewriting the Origin of Louis Sullivan's Idea (2021)


To observe that the unique architectural ornaments that make up the body of work of Louis Henri Sullivan (1856–1924) emulate nature is to state a reality so obvious that it is both pedantic and droll. To use the double entendre that those natural forms drew on Darwinism, however, is to make several more specific claims. First, it can be credibly established that the system of architectural ornament that was the primary contribution of Louis Sullivan to the discipline of architecture was directly inspired by Sullivan’s synthesis of the thesis of natural selection contained within the pages of Asa Gray’s botanical manual. Second, the circumstances of that moment of synthesis reveal that the reason for Sullivan’s Darwinism was not merely the desire to emulate nature, but rather to signify the end of faith. Finally, Sullivan’s synthesis of various Darwinisms drew not only on the thesis for his own artistic inspiration, he drew on the substance of Darwin’s arguments to formulate a secular theory of the nature of inspiration and the technique of design. In the years following, this theory has become the primary technique by which design is taught. Louis’ unique education, which was tied to Darwinism from the very beginning, gave him an unusual perspective on the challenges of architectural design in the industrial age. The economic circumstances of his life as a first-generation immigrant exposed him to just the right education to lead him to explore evolutionary science as the inspiration for design. To be clear, the content of the thesis of natural selection was entirely irrelevant to the theory and practice of architecture in the nineteenth century. Yet by the end of the century the broad consensus among architects, historians, and theorists alike was that there was a, “close and causal relationship,” between Darwinism and modern architecture. Sullivan’s theory drew on Darwinian ideas to dismiss theological styles as empty formalisms, reveal the racism of ethnographic accounts for architectural forms, and argue for the evolution of an American Architecture, liberated from its colonialist origins. The context within which that shift occurred is significant. The justification for nearly every work of architecture in human history prior to the middle of the nineteenth century was some form of god. Mid-nineteenth century architecture in the United States was composed of a variety of regional ethnic styles intended to represent the ethnic origins, religious affiliations, moral inclinations, and nationalist allegiances of an array of displaced immigrant communities. The Civil War laid bare the reality that such ethnic styles represented a segregationist and racialized idea of the modern world. Over the course of the late nineteenth century, the profession of architecture was forced to abandon theological justifications for the practice of architecture as scientifically invalid, morally corrupt, and motivated by racism. This was Sullivan’s full idea: Put instinct before reason in priority, and engage in the iterative analysis of various instincts about the situation. Observe the patterns that emerge. Explore those instincts, until you find that your patterns merge with universal patterns. Do not fear error, as it makes the work alive. The capacity to capture that living essence is in all of us, individually and collectively, not some external force. The most-right instincts are ones in which the resulting form is a demonstration of its function. To understand what Sullivan meant with this we must see it as a Darwinian idea. Instinct is an animal property, a capacity which we share with other species. For Darwin, this sharing of instinct is essential for interspecies empathy. The antithesis of instinct is reason, which Sullivan describes as secondary. Reason is cold and lifeless, but also correct. True reason, Sullivan claims, is learned by experiment, and example. The greatest art speaks not just to our reason, but to our instinct. This, then is the task of the designer—to temper instinct with reasoned evaluation. Sullivan argues that it begins with an intuition, an idea he drew from Darwin’s Descent of Man.

Citation URI

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Similar Citations

Book Valérie Nègre; (2016)
L'art et la matière: Les artisans, les architectes et la technique, 1770-1830 (/p/isis/citation/CBB678691921/) unapi

Book Cogdell, Christina; (2004)
Eugenic Design: Streamlining America in the 1930s (/p/isis/citation/CBB000401087/) unapi

Book Kriegel, Lara; (2007)
Grand Designs: Labor, Empire, and the Museum in Victorian Culture (/p/isis/citation/CBB001030142/) unapi

Chapter Karl, Alexandra; (2005)
“Naturfreund” or “Naturfeind”? Darwinism in the Early Drawings of Alfred Kubin (/p/isis/citation/CBB000772461/) unapi

Chapter Berkel, Klaas van; (2002)
“Cornelius Meijer inventor et fecit”: On the Representation of Science in Late Seventeenth-Century Rome (/p/isis/citation/CBB000551222/) unapi

Article Hutterer, Maile; (2014)
When Old Meets New: Classicizing Columns in Northern French Flying Buttress Systems (/p/isis/citation/CBB001422554/) unapi

Article Simon Dumas Primbault; (2020)
Le compas dans l’œil : la « mécanique géométrique » de Viviani au chevet de la coupole de Brunelleschi (/p/isis/citation/CBB178993786/) unapi

Article Roberta Wingerson; (1994)
The Mill Village on Goose Creek: Harrisville, New Hampshire (Photo Essay) (/p/isis/citation/CBB696283794/) unapi

Book Forty, Adrian; (1986)
Objects of desire: Design and society since 1750 (/p/isis/citation/CBB001180095/) unapi

Article Bijsterveld, Karin; (2006)
Listening to machines: Industrial noise, hearing loss and the cultural meaning of sound (/p/isis/citation/CBB001181099/) unapi

Book Numbers, Ronald L.; (2007)
Science and Christianity in Pulpit and Pew (/p/isis/citation/CBB000931076/) unapi

Book Harrison, Peter; (2010)
The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion (/p/isis/citation/CBB001031846/) unapi

Book Gosling, David L.; (2007)
Science and the Indian Tradition: When Einstein Met Tagore (/p/isis/citation/CBB000830169/) unapi

Book Wittmann, Barbara; (2009)
Spuren erzeugen: Zeichnen und Schreiben als Verfahren der Selbstaufzeichnung (/p/isis/citation/CBB001231893/) unapi

Chapter Emilio Chirone; (2014)
Note sulla storia del disegno di macchine (/p/isis/citation/CBB046114968/) unapi

Book Hoffman, Christoph; (2008)
Daten sichern. Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren der Aufzeichnung (/p/isis/citation/CBB000951095/) unapi

Book Caterina Toschi; (2018)
L'idioma Olivetti 1952–1979 (/p/isis/citation/CBB135780462/) unapi

Article Cody Hartley; (2008)
Maria Martinez, Industrial Designer (/p/isis/citation/CBB591735293/) unapi

Book Gary S. Cross; Robert N. Proctor; (2014)
Packaged Pleasures: How Technology and Marketing Revolutionized Desire (/p/isis/citation/CBB218125378/) unapi

Book Danielle Shapiro; (2016)
John Vassos: Industrial design for modern life (/p/isis/citation/CBB080942994/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Berkel, Klaas van
Bijsterveld, Karin
Cogdell, Christina Grace
Forty, Adrian
Gosling, David L.
Harrison, Peter
IA. The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies
Revue d'Histoire des Sciences
Cambridge University Press
Classiques Garnier
Duke University Press
Oxford University Press
Industrial design
Drawing; designing
Science and religion
Cassirer, Ernst
Green, William Henry
Hodge, Charles
Kubin, Alfred
Meijer, Cornelius Janszoon
Ussher, James
Time Periods
20th century
19th century
18th century
17th century
12th century
United States
Great Britain
Radio Corporation of America
Olivetti S.p.A (Firm)
Accademia delle Arti del Disegno
Haeger Potteries

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment