IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB421942539

Ethical choreography in China’s Human Gene Editing controversy (2023)

Larry Au (Author)

Science as Culture
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 535-557
Publication date: 2023
Language: English

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2218401

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2023.2218401

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Science and ethics Genomics Boundary work Biomedicine Human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) CRISPR-Cas9 Medicine and ethics Genetics 21st century China He, Jiankui

He Jiankui announced to the world in November 2018 that his team had genetically edited twin human embryos that were then brought to term. Recruiting participants through an HIV outreach group and using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, He targeted the CCR5 genes claiming this would make the children immune to HIV. One way to understand He’s case is through Charis Thompson’s concept of ethical choreography, which shows how scientists ‘invent around’ potential ethical objections to their work. In particular, such a focus on ethical choreography traces how individual scientists can exploit ambiguity in institutional boundaries to recombine different logics to advance their vision of good, innovative, and ethical science. He’s actions can be seen to been the result of his traversal of blurred boundaries that demarcate science/market and science/medicine in order to recombine academic, market, medical, and cultural logics. This combination of logics is seen in ethical justifications that He put forth for his experiment, which provoked much criticism and controversy, but should nonetheless be taken seriously and placed in context. While He’s vision of good science was rejected, examples of ethical choreography can be found in other instances of biomedical innovation and there remains the potential for other scientists to pick up where He left off. Following the ethical choreography of scientists also allows for more specificity in discussions about what and when boundaries should be strengthened or relaxed in order to advance a more equitable vision of science and technology.

...More

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB421942539

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Book John H. Evans; (2020)
The Human Gene Editing Debate (/p/isis/citation/CBB424000521/)

Article Andrew J. Hogan; (2016)
From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering (/p/isis/citation/CBB750225154/)

Book Ian McGonigle; (2021)
Genomic Citizenship: The Molecularization of Identity in the Contemporary Middle East (/p/isis/citation/CBB092609489/)

Book Myles W. Jackson; (2015)
The Genealogy of a Gene: Patents, HIV/AIDS, and Race (/p/isis/citation/CBB193037134/)

Article Joan H. Fujimura; Ramya M. Rajagopalan; (2020)
Race, Ethnicity, Ancestry, and Genomics in Hawai‘i: Discourses and Practices (/p/isis/citation/CBB252611287/)

Article Morgan Meyer; (2022)
Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility: Controversies in human gene editing (/p/isis/citation/CBB072011815/)

Book Fortun, Mike; (2008)
Promising Genomics: Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation (/p/isis/citation/CBB000850362/)

Article Clay Davis; (December 2020)
Homo adhaerens: Risk and adherence in biomedical HIV prevention research (/p/isis/citation/CBB559629478/)

Book Juan Del Llano; Lino Camprubi; (2021)
Sociedad Entre Pandemias (/p/isis/citation/CBB162353517/)

Book Bainham, Andrew; Sclater, Shelley Day; Richards, Martin; (2002)
Body Lore and Laws (/p/isis/citation/CBB000201225/)

Article Fangerau, Heiner; (2009)
Genetics and the Value of Life: Historical Dimensions (/p/isis/citation/CBB001031905/)

Article Katherine W. Darling; Angie M. Boyce; Mildred K. Cho,; Pamela L. Sankar; (2015)
“What Is the FDA Going to Think?” Negotiating Values through Reflective and Strategic Category Work in Microbiome Science (/p/isis/citation/CBB455265231/)

Article Víctor Hugo Anaya-Muñoz; Vivette García-Deister; Edna Suárez-Díaz; (2017)
Flattening and Unpacking Human Genetic Variation in Mexico, Postwar to Present (/p/isis/citation/CBB791341605/)

Article Guido Barbujani; (2017)
What Genetics Has to Say about Racial Categorization of Humans (/p/isis/citation/CBB088477154/)

Book Hallam Stevens; Sarah S. Richardson; (2015)
Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome (/p/isis/citation/CBB862623870/)

Article François C. Romijn; (2023)
Negotiating Belgian identity in Wisconsin through ancestry genomics (/p/isis/citation/CBB760985734/)

Article Joan H. Fujimura; Ramya Rajagopalan; (February 2011)
Different differences: The use of ‘genetic ancestry’ versus race in biomedical human genetic research (/p/isis/citation/CBB200339832/)

Article Rossella Costa; (2017)
From Chemical to Genetic Individuality. Evolving Concepts and Therapeutic Approaches (/p/isis/citation/CBB900408942/)

Article James Lowe; Rhodri Leng; Gil Viry; Mark Wong; Niki Vermeulen; Miguel García-Sancho; (2022)
The Bricolage of Pig Genomics (/p/isis/citation/CBB430843736/)

Book El-Haj, Nadia Abu; (2012)
The Genealogical Science: The Search for Jewish Origins and the Politics of Epistemology (/p/isis/citation/CBB001252771/)