Thesis ID: CBB199543025

Good Evidence, Bad Evidence: Science, Ethics, and the Politics of Making and Unmaking Public Health Policies (2019)


Johns, David Merritt (Author)
Bayer, Ronald (Advisor)

Columbia University
Bayer, Ronald
Publication date: 2019
Language: English

Publication Date: 2019
Physical Details: 542 pp.

This dissertation examines the recent historical period of emphasis on optimizing the use of scientific evidence in policymaking, the nature of the challenge to existing sources of authority in public health, medicine, and public policy initiated by the evidence-based movement as it developed and unfolded over fifty years, and its effect on the making and unmaking of public health policies in the United States. It engages in a broad study of how the concept of evidence has been mobilized in public health policymaking in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, how and why concepts of what should count as good evidence have changed over time, and differences in the role of scientific evidence in the policymaking versus policy-unmaking processes. The dissertation does this through an intellectual history of the evidence-based movement and three historical case studies. The three cases are: 1) the development and implementation of the low-fat campaign and its subsequent destabilization, incremental modification, and partial replacement with policies aimed at reducing population-level intake of sugar-sweetened beverages; 2) the development and adoption of salt reduction policies, and subsequent efforts by health officials to buttress those policies amid changes in the science that threatened to destabilize the policy paradigm; 3) the development and implementation of policies early in the AIDS epidemic requiring that risk-reduction counseling always be provided both before and after administration of the HIV test, and the struggles of health officials to discontinue those counseling programs when doubts emerged about their efficacy. The thesis concludes with a critique of the concept of “evidence-based policy” through the example of the US Preventive Services Task Force, a pioneer organization involved in the conduct of evidence-based analysis, which has struggled to maintain its exclusive focus on the data in the face of new policy responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. In each case study I focus on the networks of researchers, advocates, journalists, industry professionals, and public health decision makers whose collective negotiations shape policy outcomes. I draw upon extensive documentary evidence gathered in public and private archives, emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, and key informant interviews. The dissertation shows how the evidence-based movement has roots in the social sciences and the contentious politics of the War on Poverty and took shape in the 1970s in the context of a pivot to disease prevention and health promotion at moment when the efficacy of many clinical interventions had come under question. The case studies show that in situations of scientific uncertainty public health interventions must sometimes be implemented before obtaining evidence of efficacy, that institutional arrangements and historical context can powerfully shape interpretations of the available research, how pragmatic considerations such as feasibility contribute to decisions to implement interventions, the stark challenge that can be posed by institutional inertia and resistance to efforts to de-implement existing programs, and the ways in which public health actors can selectively invoke and distort the past in the service of contemporary initiatives to organize for policy change. The dissertation suggests the “evidence-based” mantra masks a complex interplay of politics, values, cultural trends, and other extra-scientific factors that often better explain the policy process than do shifts in the evidence.

Citation URI

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Similar Citations

Article Stephen John; (2022)
The Two Virtues of Science (/p/isis/citation/CBB589589263/) unapi

Book Gil Eyal; (2019)
The Crisis of Expertise (/p/isis/citation/CBB193528078/) unapi

Article Shobita Parthasarathy; (2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser (/p/isis/citation/CBB968694595/) unapi

Article Segal, Judy; Richardson, Alan; (2003)
Introduction: Scientific Ethos: Authority, Authorship, and Trust in the Sciences (/p/isis/citation/CBB000500951/) unapi

Book David Michaels; (2020)
The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception. (/p/isis/citation/CBB693959552/) unapi

Book Hans Radder; (2019)
From Commodification to the Common Good: Reconstructing Science, Technology, and Society (/p/isis/citation/CBB983107822/) unapi

Book Moreno, Jonathan D.; Berger, Sam; (2010)
Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics (/p/isis/citation/CBB001031401/) unapi

Article Matthew J. Brown; Joyce C. Havstad; (2017)
The Disconnect Problem, Scientific Authority, and Climate Policy (/p/isis/citation/CBB445794671/) unapi

Book David Demortain; (2020)
The Science of Bureaucracy: Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency (/p/isis/citation/CBB170498113/) unapi

Thesis VandeWall, Holly R.; (2011)
Expertise and the Disunity of Science: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Providing Expert Advice for Policy (/p/isis/citation/CBB001562723/) unapi

Thesis Levy, Jean Elizabeth; (2007)
Controlling the Course of Scientific Advance: The Case of Human Embryology (/p/isis/citation/CBB001560939/) unapi

Book Saswat Sarangi; Pankaj Sharma; (2018)
Artificial Intelligence: Evolution, Ethics and Public Policy (/p/isis/citation/CBB532987471/) unapi

Article Christoff, Peter; (2013)
Climate Discourse Complexes, National Climate Regimes and Australian Climate Policy (/p/isis/citation/CBB001320850/) unapi

Book Hay, Amy M.; (2021)
The Defoliation of America: Agent Orange Chemicals, Citizens, and Protests (/p/isis/citation/CBB039979128/) unapi

Article Christian Ross; (2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing (/p/isis/citation/CBB828766557/) unapi

Essay Review Hecht, David K.; (2014)
The Perpetual Quest: Science and the Search for Authority (/p/isis/citation/CBB001566302/) unapi

Thesis Kate Dorsch; (2019)
Reliable Witnesses, Crackpot Science: UFO Investigations in Cold War America, 1947-1977 (/p/isis/citation/CBB377150568/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Berger, Sam
Brown, Matthew J.
Christoff, Peter
Hay, Amy M.
Hecht, David K.
Henry, Emmanuel
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences
Spontaneous Generations
Australian Journal of Politics and History
Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology
Perspectives on Science
Science in Context
MIT Press
University of Pennsylvania
Oxford University Press
Polity Press
University of Alabama Press
University of Notre Dame
Authorities; experts
Public policy
Authority of science
Science and politics
Public health
Science and ethics
Fauci, Anthony S.
Trump, Donald H.
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
United States
Great Britain
United States. Environmental Protection Agency

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment