Book ID: CBB193528078

The Crisis of Expertise (2019)

unapi

Eyal, Gil (Author)


Polity Press
Publication date: 2019
Language: English


Publication Date: 2019
Physical Details: 208

In recent political debates there has been a significant change in the valence of the word “experts” from a superlative to a near pejorative, typically accompanied by a recitation of experts’ many failures and misdeeds. In topics as varied as Brexit, climate change, and vaccinations there is a palpable mistrust of experts and a tendency to dismiss their advice. Are we witnessing, therefore, the “death of expertise,” or is the handwringing about an “assault on science” merely the hysterical reaction of threatened elites? In this new book, Gil Eyal argues that what needs to be explained is not a one-sided “mistrust of experts” but the two-headed pushmi-pullyu of unprecedented reliance on science and expertise, on the one hand, coupled with increased skepticism and dismissal of scientific findings and expert opinion, on the other. The current mistrust of experts is best understood as one more spiral in an on-going, recursive crisis of legitimacy. The “scientization of politics,” of which critics warned in the 1960s, has brought about a politicization of science, and the two processes reinforce one another in an unstable, crisis-prone mixture. This timely book will be of great interest to students and scholars in the social sciences and to anyone concerned about the political uses of, and attacks on, scientific knowledge and expertise.

...More
Citation URI
data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB193528078

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Similar Citations

Article Stephen John; (2022)
The Two Virtues of Science (/p/isis/citation/CBB589589263/) unapi

Article Christian Ross; (2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing (/p/isis/citation/CBB828766557/) unapi

Article Frédéric Bouchard; (2016)
The Roles of Institutional Trust and Distrust in Grounding Rational Deference to Scientific Expertise (/p/isis/citation/CBB417241096/) unapi

Article Monamie Bhadra Haines; (February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India (/p/isis/citation/CBB710438620/) unapi

Article Melanie Leenen; Bart Penders; (October 2016)
Dissident Dietary Credibility: The Power of Discontent (/p/isis/citation/CBB229041974/) unapi

Article Sharon Dunwoody; Patrice A. Kohl; (June 2017)
Using Weight-of-Experts Messaging to Communicate Accurately About Contested Science (/p/isis/citation/CBB561164957/) unapi

Book Greene, Benjamin P.; (2007)
Eisenhower, Science Advice, and the Nuclear Test-Ban Debate, 1945--1963 (/p/isis/citation/CBB000741904/) unapi

Thesis Pettis, Roy C., Jr.; (2012)
When and How Presidents Use Scientific Expertise: Criteria for Success Derived from Selected Case Studies (/p/isis/citation/CBB001560846/) unapi

Book Alexa Geisthövel; Volker Hess; (2017)
Medizinisches Gutachten: Geschichte einer neuzeitlichen Praxis (/p/isis/citation/CBB228276706/) unapi

Article Henry M. Cowles; Chitra Ramalingam; (2022)
Introduction (/p/isis/citation/CBB356636672/) unapi

Book Fabiana Li; (2015)
Unearthing Conflict: Corporate Mining, Activism, and Expertise in Peru (/p/isis/citation/CBB165149143/) unapi

Book Andrew J. Hogan; (2022)
Disability Dialogues: Advocacy, Science, and Prestige in Postwar Clinical Professions (/p/isis/citation/CBB207448799/) unapi

Article Mott Greene; (2022)
Experts, Managerialism, and Democratic Theory (/p/isis/citation/CBB659481305/) unapi

Thesis David Merritt Johns; (2019)
Good Evidence, Bad Evidence: Science, Ethics, and the Politics of Making and Unmaking Public Health Policies (/p/isis/citation/CBB199543025/) unapi

Article Sheldon Krimsky; (November 2015)
An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment (/p/isis/citation/CBB119149138/) unapi

Article Federico Brandmayr; (2021)
When Boundary Organisations Fail: Identifying Scientists and Civil Servants in L’Aquila Earthquake Trial (/p/isis/citation/CBB058662495/) unapi

Article Matthew Hayes; Noah Morritt; (2020)
Michael W. Burke-Gaffney and the UFO Debate in Atlantic Canada, 1947-1969 (/p/isis/citation/CBB417665220/) unapi

Article Carlo Martini; Mattia Andreoletti; (2021)
Genuine versus bogus scientific controversies: the case of statins (/p/isis/citation/CBB565831259/) unapi

Book David Demortain; (2020)
The Science of Bureaucracy: Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency (/p/isis/citation/CBB170498113/) unapi

Article Keller, Evelyn Fox; (2011)
What Are Climate Scientists to Do? (/p/isis/citation/CBB001220693/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Bayer, Ronald
Bouchard, Frédéric
Cowles, Henry M.
Dunwoody, Sharon L.
Greene, Benjamin Patrick
Greene, Mott T.
Journals
Spontaneous Generations
Science Communication
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Perspectives on Science
Science as Culture
Publishers
Columbia University
Duke University Press
Johns Hopkins University Press
MIT Press
Stanford University Press
Wallstein Verlag
Concepts
Authority of science
Expertise
Controversies and disputes
Authorities; experts
Public understanding of science
Science and politics
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
Modern
Places
United States
India
Canada
Italy
Peru
Institutions
United States. Environmental Protection Agency
United States. President's Science Advisory Committee
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment