The Science of Bureaucracy: Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency (2020)
David Demortain (Author)
MIT Press
Publication date: 2020
Language: English
Physical Details: 452
The US Environmental Protection Agency was established in 1970 to protect the public health and environment, administering and enforcing a range of statutes and programs. Over four decades, the EPA has been a risk bureaucracy, formalizing many of the methods of the scientific governance of risk, from quantitative risk assessment to risk ranking. Demortain traces the creation of these methods for the governance of risk, the controversies to which they responded, and the controversies that they aroused in turn. He discusses the professional networks in which they were conceived; how they were used; and how they served to legitimize the EPA. Demortain argues that the EPA is structurally embedded in controversy, resulting in constant reevaluation of its credibility and fueling the evolution of the knowledge and technologies it uses to produce decisions and to create a legitimate image of how and why it acts on the environment. He describes the emergence and institutionalization of the risk assessment–risk management framework codified in the National Research Council's Red Book, and its subsequent unraveling as the agency's mission evolved toward environmental justice, ecological restoration, and sustainability, and as controversies over determining risk gained vigor in the 1990s. Through its rise and fall at the EPA, risk decision-making enshrines the science of a bureaucracy that learns how to make credible decisions and to reform itself, amid constant conflicts about the environment, risk, and its own legitimacy.
...MoreReview Michael Egan (2024) Review of "The Science of Bureaucracy: Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency". Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences (pp. 444-445).
Similar Citations
Article
Laura Maxim;
(2025)
The Birth of Green Chemistry: A Political History
Article
Yohe, Gary;
(Fall 2010)
Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Infrastructure Planning and Investment
Article
Hoffman, Karen;
(2013)
Unheeded Science: Taking Precaution out of Toxic Water Pollutants Policy
Thesis
Ashenmiller, Joshua Ross;
(2004)
The National Environmental Policy Act in the Green Decade, 1969--1981
Article
Levidow, Les;
Murphy, Joseph;
Carr, Susan;
(2007)
Recasting “Substantial Equivalence”:Transatlantic Governance of GM Food
Book
Erik M. Conway;
Donald K. Yeomans;
Meg Rosenburg;
(2022)
A History of Near-Earth Objects Research: NASA Planetary Defense Coordination Office
Book
Rebecca Slayton;
(2023)
Arguments that Count: Physics, Computing, and Missile Defense, 1949-2012
Book
Mikkael A. Sekeres;
(2022)
Drugs and the FDA: Safety, Efficacy, and the Public's Trust
Book
William Leiss;
Christina Chociolko;
(1994)
Risk and Responsibility
Book
Alissa Cordner;
(2016)
Toxic Safety: Flame Retardants, Chemical Controversies, and Environmental Health
Article
Andrew J. Ross;
(2022)
An Icy Feud in Planetary Science: Carl Sagan, Edward Teller, and the Ideological Roots of the Nuclear Winter Debates, 1980–1984
Book
Collin, Robert W.;
(2005)
The Environmental Protection Agency: Cleaning Up America's Act
Article
Evan Hepler-Smith;
(July 2019)
Molecular Bureaucracy: Toxicological Information and Environmental Protection
Book
Chadi Nabhan;
(2023)
Toxic Exposure: The True Story behind the Monsanto Trials and the Search for Justice
Book
Edmond, Gary;
(2004)
Expertise in Regulation and Law
Article
Whitney, Kristoffer;
(2014)
Domesticating Nature? Surveillance and Conservation of Migratory Shorebirds in the “Atlantic Flyway”
Article
Becky Mansfield;
(2021)
Deregulatory science: Chemical risk analysis in Trump’s EPA
Article
Le Roux, Thomas;
(2013)
Les effondrements de carrières de Paris: La grande réforme des années 1770
Article
Aya H. Kimura;
(2018)
Fukushima ETHOS: Post-Disaster Risk Communication, Affect, and Shifting Risks
Article
Scully, John R.;
(Summer 2016)
The Corrosion Crisis in Flint, Michigan: A Call for Improvements in Technology Stewardship
Be the first to comment!