Christiane Wilke (Author)
While the distinction between civilians and combatants is fundamental to international law, it is contested and complicated in practice. How do North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) officers see civilians in Afghanistan? Focusing on 2009 air strike in Kunduz, this article argues that the professional vision of NATO officers relies not only on recent military technologies that allow for aerial surveillance, thermal imaging, and precise targeting but also on the assumptions, vocabularies, modes of attention, and hierarchies of knowledges that the officers bring to the interpretation of aerial surveillance images. Professional vision is socially situated and frequently contested with communities of practice. In the case of the Kunduz air strike, the aerial vantage point and the military visual technologies cannot fully determine what would be seen. Instead, the officers’ assumptions about Afghanistan, threats, and the gender of the civilian inform the vocabulary they use for coding people and places as civilian or noncivilian. Civilians are not simply “found,” they are produced through specific forms of professional vision.
...MoreArticle Lucy Suchman; Karolina Follis; Jutta Weber (November 2017) Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security: (Introduction). Science, Technology, and Human Values (pp. 983-1002).
Article
Lucy Suchman;
Karolina Follis;
Jutta Weber;
(November 2017)
Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security: (Introduction)
(/p/isis/citation/CBB721841161/)
Article
Chuncheng Liu;
(2022)
Seeing Like a State, Enacting Like an Algorithm: (Re)assembling Contact Tracing and Risk Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic
(/p/isis/citation/CBB635816935/)
Article
Nicholas Buchanan;
(May 2017)
Which Fish? Knowledge, Articulation, and Legitimization in Claims about Endangered and Culturally Significant Animals
(/p/isis/citation/CBB452061779/)
Book
Gilliom, John;
Monahan, Torin;
(2013)
SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001421286/)
Book
Kevin Howley;
(2018)
Drones: Media Discourse and the Public Imagination
(/p/isis/citation/CBB047987646/)
Article
Jaakko Taipale;
(June 2019)
Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise
(/p/isis/citation/CBB635897203/)
Article
Abraham S. D. Tidwell;
Jessica M. Smith;
(September 2015)
Morals, Materials, and Technoscience: The Energy Security Imaginary in the United States
(/p/isis/citation/CBB992433257/)
Article
Sheila Jasanoff;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(December 2017)
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures
(/p/isis/citation/CBB640965055/)
Article
Benjamin K. Sovacool;
David J. Hess;
(October 2017)
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change
(/p/isis/citation/CBB756258184/)
Article
Reijer Hendrikse;
Ilke Adriaans;
Tobias J. Klinge;
Rodrigo Fernandez;
(2022)
The Big Techification of Everything
(/p/isis/citation/CBB019537404/)
Article
Fatima K. Espinoza Vasquez;
(2023)
Working at the Seams of Colonial Structures: Alternative Sociotechnical Infrastructures Revealed by Hurricane Maria
(/p/isis/citation/CBB231267644/)
Article
Benjamin K. Sovacool;
Katherine Lovell;
Marie Blanche Ting;
(November 2018)
Reconfiguration, Contestation, and Decline: Conceptualizing Mature Large Technical Systems
(/p/isis/citation/CBB797225432/)
Article
Sam Weiss Evans;
Matthias Leese;
Dagmar Rychnovská;
(April 2021)
Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration
(/p/isis/citation/CBB461668631/)
Article
Shana Lee Hirsch;
Jerrold Long;
(March 2021)
Adaptive Epistemologies: Conceptualizing Adaptation to Climate Change in Environmental Science
(/p/isis/citation/CBB087611495/)
Article
Rebecca Slayton;
(January 2021)
Governing Uncertainty or Uncertain Governance? Information Security and the Challenge of Cutting Ties
(/p/isis/citation/CBB911361449/)
Article
Edward B Kang;
(2022)
Biometric imaginaries: Formatting voice, body, identity to data
(/p/isis/citation/CBB345469713/)
Article
Sergio Urueña;
(2022)
Anticipation and modal power: Opening up and closing down the momentum of sociotechnical systems
(/p/isis/citation/CBB466032431/)
Article
Chih-yuan Yang;
Bronislaw Szerszynski;
Brian Wynne;
(September 2018)
The Making of Power Shortage: The Sociotechnical Imaginary of Nationalist High Modernism and Its Pragmatic Rationality in Electricity Planning in Taiwan
(/p/isis/citation/CBB183913124/)
Article
Neelke Doorn;
Behnam Taebi;
(May 2018)
Rawls’s Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Engaged Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Potentials and Limitations for the Context of Technological Risks
(/p/isis/citation/CBB722391619/)
Essay Review
Francesca Musiani;
(March 2015)
Review Essay: Practice, Plurality, Performativity, and Plumbing: Internet Governance Research Meets Science and Technology Studies
(/p/isis/citation/CBB529244714/)
Be the first to comment!