Morgan Meyer (Author)
Social Studies of Science
Volume: 52
Issue: 1
Pages: 127-143
Publication date: 2022
Language: English
In current discussions, human germline editing is often called ‘irresponsible’. Looking at the international summits on human gene editing held in 2015 and in 2018 and the announcement by He Jiankui of the birth of two gene-edited babies in November 2018, this article analyses how ‘irresponsible’ research was the result of various (dis)qualifications and demarcations. Against a background of discussions of responsibility, an individual scientist was singled out, his experiments were scrutinized for their soundness, legality and safety and ethical and moral stances were questioned. These are features of a process that I call ‘irresponsibilization’. This irresponsibilization of research is entangled with calls for further action: Irresponsible research like that of He Jiankui should be contained, the veracity of knowledge claims needs to be confirmed, and institutions and decision-makers are called to act. The controversy turned ‘irresponsible’ into an active category, and rendered explicit its political, institutional and practical ramifications.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Alyssa Botelho;
(2021)
The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy
Book
John H. Evans;
(2020)
The Human Gene Editing Debate
Book
Neal Baer;
(2024)
The Promise and Peril of CRISPR
Article
Christian Ross;
(2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
Book
Sahotra Sarkar;
(2021)
Cut-and-Paste Genetics: A CRISPR Revolution
Article
Andrew J. Hogan;
(2016)
From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering
Book
Jennifer A. Doudna;
Samuel H. Sternberg;
(2017)
A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution
Book
Walter Isaacson;
(2021)
The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race
Article
Clay Davis;
(December 2020)
Homo adhaerens: Risk and adherence in biomedical HIV prevention research
Article
Melanie Jeske;
(March 2024)
Science Estranged: Power and Inequity in Laboratory Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Article
Larry Au;
(2023)
Ethical choreography in China’s Human Gene Editing controversy
Article
Jennifer Kuzma;
(2023)
Governance of Gene-edited Plants: Insights from the History of Biotechnology Oversight and Policy Process Theory
Article
Theresa Selfa;
Christopher Cummings;
Michael Dahlstrom;
Sonja Lindberg;
David Peters;
Clark Wolf;
Carmen Bain;
(2023)
Gene Editing in Agriculture: Social Concerns, Public Engagement, and Governance
Article
Michael F. Dahlstrom;
Zhe Wang;
Sonja Lindberg;
Kasey Opfer;
Christopher L. Cummings;
(2023)
The Media’s Taste for Gene-Edited Food: Comparing Media Portrayals within US and European Regulatory Environments
Article
Sara Nawaz;
Terre Satterfield;
Rapichan Phurisamban;
(2023)
Does “Precision” Matter? A Q Study of Public Interpretations of Gene Editing in Agriculture
Article
Jacobson, Arne;
Kammen, Daniel;
(Winter 2005)
Science and Engineering Research That Values the Planet
Article
Ashley Shew;
Keith Johnson;
(2018)
Companion Animals as Technologies in Biomedical Research
Article
Gregoire Molinatti;
Lionel Simonneau;
(April 2015)
A Socioenvironmental Shale Gas Controversy: Scientists’ Public Communications, Social Responsibility and Collective Versus Individual Positions
Article
Choon Key Chekar;
Hyomin Kim;
(2022)
COVID-19 Exceptionalism: Explaining South Korean Responses
Article
Todd M Olszewski;
(2018)
Between Bench and Bedside: Building Clinical Consensus at the NIH, 1977–2013
Be the first to comment!