Article ID: CBB035082879

When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry (June 2022)

unapi

Elina Helosvuori (Author)
Riikka Homanen (Author)


Social Studies of Science
Volume: 52
Issue: 3
Pages: 425-446
Publication date: June 2022
Language: English


The multibillion-dollar fertility industry promotes standardization in in vitro fertilization laboratories. Transnational pharmaceutical and biotechnological giants distribute a wide range of fertility products, from embryo culture mediums and incubator technologies to add-ons such as time-lapse embryo monitoring. These technologies are designed to standardize and automate knowledge production regarding embryonic viability. More effective knowledge production enables the more effective selection of embryos for transfer, which in turn leads to more future babies and enables economic scaling-up. Drawing on two multi-sited ethnographic studies at eight fertility clinics in Finland during 2013–2020, this article discusses how knowledge about embryos is produced in the processes and practices of embryo culture. We argue that automation and standardization in clinical practice are not always perceived as economically desirable. Sometimes standard technologies do not replace hands-on knowledge production, although they may transform it. The technologies are also perceived as modifying the object of knowledge itself in undesired or unnecessary ways. In such cases, concerns are raised regarding the best interests of patients, embryos and future babies, who might be better served by masterful laboratory craftwork. We conclude that embryo culture is not only a site of knowledge production – one that aims to make babies and parents through standard and craftwork knowledge practices – but also a site of multiple bio-economies of assisted reproduction, some of which resist automation and standardization.

...More
Citation URI
data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB035082879

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Similar Citations

Article Alina Geampana; Manuela Perrotta; (2023)
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production unapi

Article María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra; (2019)
Of flesh and bone: Emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict unapi

Article Clémence Pinel; (March 2021)
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science unapi

Article Beth Greenhough; Emma Roe; (July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector unapi

Book Franklin, Sarah; (2013)
Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship unapi

Book Roberts, Elizabeth F. S.; (2012)
God's Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes unapi

Article Eve-Riina Hyrkäs; (2021)
Psychosomatic Pain? The Meanings of Musculoskeletal Affliction in Finnish Medicine, ca. 1950–2000 unapi

Article Yu-Yueh Tsai; (2024)
Indigenous DNA as a metaphor: Nation-building and scientific debates on the rediscovery of Taiwanese ancestry unapi

Article Sibille Merz; (July 2021)
Global Trials, Local Bodies: Negotiating Difference and Sameness in Indian For-profit Clinical Trials unapi

Article Tessa Moll; (2022)
Six Days in Plastic: Potentiality, Normalization, and In Vitro Embryos in the Postgenomic Age unapi

Book Arpita Roy; (2024)
Unfinished Nature: Particle Physics at CERN unapi

Article Lisa Lindén; (July 2021)
Moving Evidence: Patients’ Groups, Biomedical Research, and Affects unapi

Book James Doucet-Battle; (2021)
Sweetness in the Blood: Race, Risk, and Type 2 Diabetes unapi

Book Eric I. Karchmer; (2022)
Prescriptions for Virtuosity: The Postcolonial Struggle of Chinese Medicine unapi

Article Jiang, Lijing; (2015)
IVF the Chinese Way: Zhang Lizhu and Post-Mao Human In Vitro Fertilization Research unapi

Article Esa Väliverronen; Sampsa Saikkonen; (November 2021)
Freedom of Expression Challenged: Scientists’ Perspectives on Hidden Forms of Suppression and Self-censorship unapi

Article Pia Vuolanto; Marjo Kolehmainen; (July 2021)
Gendered Boundary-work within the Finnish Skepticism Movement unapi

Article David Demortain; (2024)
Mistrust of the black box: The public auditing of private models in the chemicals regulatory space unapi

Article Anissa Tanweer; James Steinhoff; (2024)
Academic data science: Transdisciplinary and extradisciplinary visions unapi

Article Amanda Menking; Jon Rosenberg; (May 2021)
WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and Other Stories Wikipedia Tells Us: A Feminist Critique of Wikipedia’s Epistemology unapi

Authors & Contributors
Karchmer, Eric I.
Olarte Sierra, María Fernanda
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S.
Väliverronen, Esa
Franklin, Sarah
Jiang, Lijing
Journals
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Science as Culture
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
European Journal for the History of Medicine and Health
Publishers
Columbia University Press
Duke University Press
Fordham University Press
University of California Press
University of Minnesota Press
Concepts
Science and technology studies (STS)
Biomedicine
Ethnography
Knowledge production
Fertilization, in vitro
Laboratories
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
Places
China
Finland
Great Britain
India
Taiwan
South Africa
Institutions
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment