Elina Helosvuori (Author)
Riikka Homanen (Author)
The multibillion-dollar fertility industry promotes standardization in in vitro fertilization laboratories. Transnational pharmaceutical and biotechnological giants distribute a wide range of fertility products, from embryo culture mediums and incubator technologies to add-ons such as time-lapse embryo monitoring. These technologies are designed to standardize and automate knowledge production regarding embryonic viability. More effective knowledge production enables the more effective selection of embryos for transfer, which in turn leads to more future babies and enables economic scaling-up. Drawing on two multi-sited ethnographic studies at eight fertility clinics in Finland during 2013–2020, this article discusses how knowledge about embryos is produced in the processes and practices of embryo culture. We argue that automation and standardization in clinical practice are not always perceived as economically desirable. Sometimes standard technologies do not replace hands-on knowledge production, although they may transform it. The technologies are also perceived as modifying the object of knowledge itself in undesired or unnecessary ways. In such cases, concerns are raised regarding the best interests of patients, embryos and future babies, who might be better served by masterful laboratory craftwork. We conclude that embryo culture is not only a site of knowledge production – one that aims to make babies and parents through standard and craftwork knowledge practices – but also a site of multiple bio-economies of assisted reproduction, some of which resist automation and standardization.
...More
Article
Alina Geampana;
Manuela Perrotta;
(2023)
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production
Article
María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra;
(2019)
Of flesh and bone: Emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict
Article
Clémence Pinel;
(March 2021)
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
Book
Franklin, Sarah;
(2013)
Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship
Book
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S.;
(2012)
God's Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes
Article
Eve-Riina Hyrkäs;
(2021)
Psychosomatic Pain? The Meanings of Musculoskeletal Affliction in Finnish Medicine, ca. 1950–2000
Article
Yu-Yueh Tsai;
(2024)
Indigenous DNA as a metaphor: Nation-building and scientific debates on the rediscovery of Taiwanese ancestry
Article
Sibille Merz;
(July 2021)
Global Trials, Local Bodies: Negotiating Difference and Sameness in Indian For-profit Clinical Trials
Article
Tessa Moll;
(2022)
Six Days in Plastic: Potentiality, Normalization, and In Vitro Embryos in the Postgenomic Age
Book
Arpita Roy;
(2024)
Unfinished Nature: Particle Physics at CERN
Article
Lisa Lindén;
(July 2021)
Moving Evidence: Patients’ Groups, Biomedical Research, and Affects
Book
James Doucet-Battle;
(2021)
Sweetness in the Blood: Race, Risk, and Type 2 Diabetes
Book
Eric I. Karchmer;
(2022)
Prescriptions for Virtuosity: The Postcolonial Struggle of Chinese Medicine
Article
Jiang, Lijing;
(2015)
IVF the Chinese Way: Zhang Lizhu and Post-Mao Human In Vitro Fertilization Research
Article
Esa Väliverronen;
Sampsa Saikkonen;
(November 2021)
Freedom of Expression Challenged: Scientists’ Perspectives on Hidden Forms of Suppression and Self-censorship
Article
Pia Vuolanto;
Marjo Kolehmainen;
(July 2021)
Gendered Boundary-work within the Finnish Skepticism Movement
Article
David Demortain;
(2024)
Mistrust of the black box: The public auditing of private models in the chemicals regulatory space
Article
Anissa Tanweer;
James Steinhoff;
(2024)
Academic data science: Transdisciplinary and extradisciplinary visions
Article
Amanda Menking;
Jon Rosenberg;
(May 2021)
WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and Other Stories Wikipedia Tells Us: A Feminist Critique of Wikipedia’s Epistemology
Be the first to comment!