Cauvin, Jean-Paul (Author)
Emory University
Corrigan, Kevin
Corrigan, Kevin
Johnston, John H
Goodstein, Elizabeth S
Johnston, John H
Publication date: 2014
Language: English
Edition Details: Advisor: Goodstein, Elizabeth S; Committee Members: Corrigan, Kevin, Johnston, John H.
Physical Details: 503 pp.
The dissertation is an historical and philosophical examination of the epistemology of science in France between 1905 (the year Einstein [1879-1955] published the quartet of papers including the germinal formulation of the special theory of relativity) and 1971 (the year Georges Canguilhem [1901-1995] retired as the director of the Institut d'Histoire des Sciences et des Techniques), dates which I argue bookend the emergence of an epistemological tradition which Dominique Lecourt (1944 -) has dubbed "historical epistemology." I argue that, within this time frame (1905-1971), a methodological consensus emerges within French philosophy according to which the epistemological norms used to evaluate the validity of scientific knowledge must be continually revised in order to account for the historical transformation of scientific concepts and methods. I argue that two consequences proceed from this basic methodological program which have largely escaped critical notice in the Anglo-American and Francophone scholarship devoted to the subject. The first concerns a transformation of the implicit norms guiding epistemological critique. Unlike the Positivist or Neo-Kantian projects of the nineteenth century, the tradition of historical epistemology systematically rejects predetermined theories of the developmental logic of science, on the one hand, (Positivist historiography of science), and the transcendental determination of epistemic normativity on the other (Neo-Kantian Wissenschaftslehre ). The second concerns a transformation of the epistemological status of the history of science itself. The tradition rejects the history of science as a stable configuration, indeed, I argue that a sophisticated historiographical method unites the historical epistemologists in a common project whereby the writing of the history of science becomes a task that must be perpetually renewed. The dissertation has two primary aims. 1) To demonstrate the theoretical consistency of the tradition by determining the nature and function of the normative epistemological commitments which organize its concepts and methodologies, and, in so doing, to contribute to the history of philosophy in twentieth century France and to the history of the philosophy of science. 2) To reconstruct the variable histories of philosophy and of science which the historical epistemologists produce as the result of the epistemological determination of the nature of scientific rationality.
...MoreDescription Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 75/11(E), May 2015. Proquest Document ID: 1560897124.
Similar Citations
Article
Méthot, Pierre-Olivier;
(2013)
On the Genealogy of Concepts and Experimental Practices: Rethinking Georges Canguilhem's Historical Epistemology
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001211304/)
Article
Matteo Vagelli;
(2018)
De la science des monstres: Canguilhem et la tératologie expérimentale d’Étienne Wolff
(/p/isis/citation/CBB647211350/)
Article
Laurent Loison;
(2018)
Introduction: Biologie, philosophie de la biologie et histoire de la biologie chez Georges Canguilhem (1904-1995)
(/p/isis/citation/CBB248480451/)
Article
Isabel Gabel;
(2018)
La biologie, la réflexivité et l’histoire: Réinscrire Canguilhem dans son milieu
(/p/isis/citation/CBB085805175/)
Article
David M. Peña-Guzmán;
(2020)
French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality
(/p/isis/citation/CBB928733497/)
Article
Laurent Loison;
(2019)
Les Œuvres complètes de Georges Canguilhem
(/p/isis/citation/CBB668229061/)
Article
Victor Petit;
(2019)
Jean Gayon (1949-2018): Itinéraire d’un darwinien
(/p/isis/citation/CBB150653875/)
Article
Roth Xavier;
(2018)
When the Content to Be Taught Is a Norm: Canguilhem-Inspired Contributions to Educational Practices
(/p/isis/citation/CBB543469377/)
Article
François Delaporte;
(2018)
The Birth of the Clinic and the Sources of Archaeological History
(/p/isis/citation/CBB852374486/)
Book
Onur Erdur;
(2018)
Die epistemologischen Jahre: Philosophie und Biologie in Frankreich, 1960-1980
(/p/isis/citation/CBB577433788/)
Chapter
Salvo D'Agostino;
(2009)
Einstein: la scienza come autocritica
(/p/isis/citation/CBB537435671/)
Article
Line Joranger;
(2016)
Individual Perception and Cultural Development: Foucault’s 1954 Approach to Mental Illness and Its History
(/p/isis/citation/CBB050077916/)
Book
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2010)
An Epistemology of the Concrete
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001023158/)
Article
Elske de Waal;
Sjang L. ten Hagen;
(2020)
The Concept of Fact in German Physics around 1900: A Comparison between Mach and Einstein
(/p/isis/citation/CBB266214579/)
Chapter
John D. Norton;
(2012)
Chasing the Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment
(/p/isis/citation/CBB201950329/)
Article
Toscano, Marco;
(2007)
An “Abstruse” Doctrine: The Historical-Philosophical Meaning of Einstein's Relativity in Federigo Enriques
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000800279/)
Article
Fabrizio Li Vigni;
(2015)
Il pensiero complesso tra epistemologia e impegno civile. Introduzione al Metodo di Edgar Morin
(/p/isis/citation/CBB248687467/)
Chapter
Francesco Calemi;
(2017)
Sottodeterminazione e leggi di natura: Osservazioni sulla tesi Duhem–Quine
(/p/isis/citation/CBB568450738/)
Article
M. Anthony Mills;
(2015)
Explicating Meyerson: The Critique of Positivism and Historical Épistémologie
(/p/isis/citation/CBB833228543/)
Article
Krist Vaesen;
(2021)
French Neopositivism and the Logic, Psychology, and Sociology of Scientific Discovery
(/p/isis/citation/CBB634106059/)
Be the first to comment!