IsisCB Explore

Thesis ID: CBB001567586

A New Machine For Thinking: Historical Epistemology in Twentieth Century France (2014)

Emory University
Corrigan, Kevin
Corrigan, Kevin
Johnston, John H
Goodstein, Elizabeth S
Johnston, John H
Publication date: 2014
Language: English

ISBN: 9781321148855

Publication Date: 2014
Edition Details: Advisor: Goodstein, Elizabeth S; Committee Members: Corrigan, Kevin, Johnston, John H.
Physical Details: 503 pp.

Outside Links

Philosophy of science Epistemology 20th century France Einstein, Albert Canguilhem, Georges

The dissertation is an historical and philosophical examination of the epistemology of science in France between 1905 (the year Einstein [1879-1955] published the quartet of papers including the germinal formulation of the special theory of relativity) and 1971 (the year Georges Canguilhem [1901-1995] retired as the director of the Institut d'Histoire des Sciences et des Techniques), dates which I argue bookend the emergence of an epistemological tradition which Dominique Lecourt (1944 -) has dubbed "historical epistemology." I argue that, within this time frame (1905-1971), a methodological consensus emerges within French philosophy according to which the epistemological norms used to evaluate the validity of scientific knowledge must be continually revised in order to account for the historical transformation of scientific concepts and methods. I argue that two consequences proceed from this basic methodological program which have largely escaped critical notice in the Anglo-American and Francophone scholarship devoted to the subject. The first concerns a transformation of the implicit norms guiding epistemological critique. Unlike the Positivist or Neo-Kantian projects of the nineteenth century, the tradition of historical epistemology systematically rejects predetermined theories of the developmental logic of science, on the one hand, (Positivist historiography of science), and the transcendental determination of epistemic normativity on the other (Neo-Kantian Wissenschaftslehre ). The second concerns a transformation of the epistemological status of the history of science itself. The tradition rejects the history of science as a stable configuration, indeed, I argue that a sophisticated historiographical method unites the historical epistemologists in a common project whereby the writing of the history of science becomes a task that must be perpetually renewed. The dissertation has two primary aims. 1) To demonstrate the theoretical consistency of the tradition by determining the nature and function of the normative epistemological commitments which organize its concepts and methodologies, and, in so doing, to contribute to the history of philosophy in twentieth century France and to the history of the philosophy of science. 2) To reconstruct the variable histories of philosophy and of science which the historical epistemologists produce as the result of the epistemological determination of the nature of scientific rationality.

...More

Description Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 75/11(E), May 2015. Proquest Document ID: 1560897124.

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB001567586

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Méthot, Pierre-Olivier; (2013)
On the Genealogy of Concepts and Experimental Practices: Rethinking Georges Canguilhem's Historical Epistemology

Article Matteo Vagelli; (2018)
De la science des monstres: Canguilhem et la tératologie expérimentale d’Étienne Wolff

Article Laurent Loison; (2018)
Introduction: Biologie, philosophie de la biologie et histoire de la biologie chez Georges Canguilhem (1904-1995)

Article Isabel Gabel; (2018)
La biologie, la réflexivité et l’histoire: Réinscrire Canguilhem dans son milieu

Article David M. Peña-Guzmán; (2020)
French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality

Article Laurent Loison; (2019)
Les Œuvres complètes de Georges Canguilhem

Article Victor Petit; (2019)
Jean Gayon (1949-2018): Itinéraire d’un darwinien

Article Roth Xavier; (2018)
When the Content to Be Taught Is a Norm: Canguilhem-Inspired Contributions to Educational Practices

Book Giuseppe Bianco; Charles T. Wolfe; Gertrudis Van De Vijver; (2023)
Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology

Book Matteo Vagelli; (2024)
Reconsidering Historical Epistemology: French and Anglophone Styles in History and Philosophy of Science

Article François Delaporte; (2018)
The Birth of the Clinic and the Sources of Archaeological History

Book Onur Erdur; (2018)
Die epistemologischen Jahre: Philosophie und Biologie in Frankreich, 1960-1980

Chapter Salvo D'Agostino; (2009)
Einstein: la scienza come autocritica

Article Line Joranger; (2016)
Individual Perception and Cultural Development: Foucault’s 1954 Approach to Mental Illness and Its History

Book Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg; (2010)
An Epistemology of the Concrete

Article Elske de Waal; Sjang L. ten Hagen; (2020)
The Concept of Fact in German Physics around 1900: A Comparison between Mach and Einstein

Chapter John D. Norton; (2012)
Chasing the Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment

Article Toscano, Marco; (2007)
An “Abstruse” Doctrine: The Historical-Philosophical Meaning of Einstein's Relativity in Federigo Enriques

Article Fabrizio Li Vigni; (2015)
Il pensiero complesso tra epistemologia e impegno civile. Introduzione al Metodo di Edgar Morin

Chapter Francesco Calemi; (2017)
Sottodeterminazione e leggi di natura: Osservazioni sulla tesi Duhem–Quine