Feest, Uljana (Author)
I provide a historical and philosophical analysis of the doctrine of operationism, which emerged in American psychology in the 1930s. While operationism is frequently characterized as a semantic thesis (which demands that concepts be defined by means of measurement operations), I argue that it is better understood as a methodological strategy, which urges that scientific concepts have to be cast in a form that makes their referents amenable to experimental investigation. I present three historical case studies of the work of early proponents of operationism and show that all of them were impressed by behaviorist critiques of traditional mentalism and introspectivism, while still wanting to investigate some of the phenomena of traditional psychology (consciousness, purpose, motivation). I show that when these psychologists used operational definitions, they posited the existence of particular psychological phenomena and treated certain experimental data---by stipulation ---as indicative of those phenomena. However, they viewed these stipulative empirical definitions as neither a priori true, nor as unrevisable. While such stipulative definitions have the function of getting empirical research about a phenomenon off the ground, they clearly don't provide sufficient evidence for the existence of the phenomenon. In the philosophical part of my dissertation, I raise the epistemological question of what it would take to provide such evidence, relating this question to recent debates in the philosophy of experimentation. I argue that evidence for the existence of a given phenomenon is produced as part of testing descriptive hypotheses about the phenomenon. Given how many background assumptions have to be made in order to test a hypothesis about a phenomenon, I raise the question of whether claims about the existence of psychological phenomena are underdetermined by data. I argue that they are not. Lastly, I present an analysis of the scientific notion of an experimental artifact, and introduce the notion of an artifactual belief, i.e. an experimentally well-confirmed belief that later turns out to be false, when one or more of the background assumptions (relative to which the belief was confirmed) turn out to be false.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2004): 4071. UMI order no. 3111163.
Article
Sackur, Jérôme;
(2009)
L'introspection en psychologie expérimentale
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000954545/)
Article
Rutherford, Alexandra;
(2003)
B. F. Skinner and the Auditory Inkblot: The Rise and Fall of the Verbal Summator as a Projective Technique
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000401259/)
Book
Slater, Lauren;
(2004)
Opening Skinner's Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000550399/)
Article
Kelle Dhein;
(2023)
The cognitive map debate in insects: A historical perspective on what is at stake
(/p/isis/citation/CBB595507323/)
Article
Simon Torracinta;
(2023)
Maps of desire: Edward Tolman's drive theory of wants
(/p/isis/citation/CBB895271926/)
Book
Lemov, Rebecca;
(2005)
World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000741953/)
Thesis
Backe, Andrew Steven;
(2000)
The divided psychology of John Dewey
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001560908/)
Article
Saulo de Freitas Araujo;
Fernando Tavares Saraiva;
Marcus Bentes de Carvalho Neto;
(2019)
Reevaluating the initial impact of John Broadus Watson on American psychology: The necessity of comparative parameters
(/p/isis/citation/CBB692345477/)
Article
Andrick, John M.;
(2013)
Cultivating a “Chairside Manner”: Dental Hypnosis, Patient Management Psychology, and the Origins of Behavioral Dentistry in America, 1890--1910
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001213790/)
Article
Rutherford, Alexandra;
(2003)
B. F. Skinner's Technology of Behavior in American Life: From Consumer Culture to Counterculture
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000300877/)
Article
Christian Damböck;
(2020)
What Is Descriptive Psychology? Ebbinghaus’s 1896 Criticism of Dilthey Revisited
(/p/isis/citation/CBB745855190/)
Article
Rodkey, Elissa N.;
(2011)
Last of the Mohicans? James McCosh and Psychology “Old” and “New”
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001220671/)
Article
Fuchs, Thomas;
Burgdorf, Jeffrey;
(2008)
Replication and Pedagogy in the History of Psychology IV: Patrick and Gilbert (1896) on Sleep Deprivation
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001032873/)
Chapter
Morawski, Jill;
(2007)
Scientific Selves: Discerning Subject and Experimenter in Experimental Psychology in the United States, 1900--1935
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000951578/)
Article
Kroker, Kenton;
(2003)
The Progress of Introspection in America, 1896--1938
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000300617/)
Article
Trevino, Kelly M.;
Konrad, Krista K.;
(2008)
Replication and Pedagogy in the History of Psychology II: Fowler & Wells's Phrenology
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001032871/)
Article
Goodwin, C. James;
(2010)
The 1928 Carlisle Conference: Knight Dunlap and a National Laboratory for Psychology
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001033704/)
Thesis
Groppi, Susan Marie;
(2006)
The Science of Mind: Exploring the Influence of the Academic Environment on the Development of Research Psychology in America, 1880--1910
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001561466/)
Article
Gregory Radick;
(2016)
The Unmaking of a Modern Synthesis: Noam Chomsky, Charles Hockett, and the Politics of Behaviorism, 1955–1965
(/p/isis/citation/CBB134415153/)
Article
Katja Guenther;
(2017)
Monkeys, Mirrors, and Me: Gordon Gallup and the Study of Self-Recognition
(/p/isis/citation/CBB045415018/)
Be the first to comment!