Gallo, Jason (Author)
This dissertation argues that the National Science Foundation's role in, and influence on, the development of large scale scientific and technological systems, most notably improvements to U.S. information infrastructure, can best be understood through an examination of the NSF's institutional history. Because of the Foundation's weakened starting position at its founding in 1950, the cautious nature of its first director, Alan T. Waterman, and its broad mission "to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense" through support for basic science, it has been forced to develop a strategy that ensures its continued survival among larger, older, and more powerful agencies competing for congressional appropriations. This strategy has two components: a discursive approach that situates Foundation support for basic research to the frontier rhetoric of Frederick Jackson Turner and Vannevar Bush and promotes the societal, economic, political, and security benefits of basic research utilizing a linear model of innovation. The NSF's operational strategy emphasizes the development of information and communications infrastructure, information management, virtual simulation, and at the most fundamental level, the generation of new scientific knowledge. This dissertation examines the influence of external and internal feedback upon the NSF. In response to these stimuli, the NSF has repeatedly utilized the frontier imagery of Frederick Jackson Turner and Vannevar Bush to justify its operations. This rhetoric has shaped the NSF's historic support for the virtual frontiers of science--satellites, information management and control systems, supercomputing, the NSFNET backbone, and the Network for Computational Nanotechnology. The NSF not only supports the opening of frontiers through building and supporting infrastructure, but also through grants to researchers and the training of scientific pioneers. By providing support at critical and overlapping stages and junctures of the frontier enterprise, the NSF simultaneously fulfills its mission and creates lasting infrastructural traces that establish sovereignty over space and enables the generation of fundamental knowledge that undergirds, at least rhetorically, the linear model of innovation that shapes post-war science and technology policy in the United States.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/11 (2009). Pub. no. AAT 3331106.
Article
Gallo, Jason;
(2009)
The Discursive and Operational Foundations of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the History of the National Science Foundation
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000932271/)
Article
Adeoti, John Olatunji;
(2002)
Building Technological Capability in the Less Developed Countries: The Role of a National System of Innovation
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000200045/)
Book
Solovey, Mark;
(2013)
Shaky Foundations: The Politics--Patronage--Social Science Nexus in Cold War America
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001550276/)
Article
Mata, Tiago;
Scheiding, Tom;
(2012)
National Science Foundation Patronage of Social Science, 1970s and 1980s: Congressional Scrutiny, Advocacy Network, and the Prestige of Economics
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001211967/)
Article
Kurihara, Takeshi;
(2003)
Non Military Character of the National Science Foundation and the Movement of the Federation of American Scientists: Debate on the Support System of Scientific Research and Development Activities in the United States, 1945--1950
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000600619/)
Article
Johnny Miri;
(2021)
The Fall of Vannevar Bush: The Forgotten War for Control of Science Policy in Postwar America
(/p/isis/citation/CBB869305077/)
Book
Benedetta Campanile;
(2016)
Vannevar Bush, da ingegnere a tecnologo: La nascita della società dell’informazione
(/p/isis/citation/CBB542129225/)
Book
Jerry Prout;
(2022)
Chasing Automation: The Politics of Technology and Jobs from the Roaring Twenties to the Great Society
(/p/isis/citation/CBB556042894/)
Article
Frank N. Laird;
(2020)
Sticky Policies, Dysfunctional Systems: Path Dependency and the Problems of Government Funding for Science in the United States
(/p/isis/citation/CBB444679505/)
Article
Launius, Roger D.;
(2010)
An Unintended Consequence of the IGY: Eisenhower, Sputnik, and the Founding of NASA
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001232443/)
Book
Weiner, Sharon K.;
(2011)
Our Own Worst Enemy? Institutional Interests and the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Expertise
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001221236/)
Book
Martini, Edwin A.;
(2012)
Agent Orange: History, Science, and the Politics of Uncertainty
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001320939/)
Book
Kraemer, Sylvia K.;
(2006)
Science and Technology Policy in the United States: Open Systems in Action
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000773752/)
Article
White, Robert M.;
(2006)
The Making of NOAA, 1963--2005
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000931785/)
Book
Charrow, Robert P.;
(2010)
Law in the Laboratory: A Guide to the Ethics of Federally Funded Science Research
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001022405/)
Book
Mirowski, Philip;
(2011)
Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001210019/)
Article
Solovey, Mark;
(2012)
Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation Proposal: Reconsidering Federal Science Policy, Natural Science--Social Science Relations, and American Liberalism during the 1960s
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001231876/)
Thesis
Benjamin W. Goossen;
(2021)
The Year of the Earth (1957-1958): Cold War Science and the Making of Planetary Consciousness
(/p/isis/citation/CBB233980968/)
Thesis
Ian J. Varga;
(2022)
Reviving the Search for Life: Astrobiology, NASA, and the Politics of Science in the Late Twentieth-Century United States
(/p/isis/citation/CBB684396859/)
Thesis
Berman, Elizabeth Popp;
(2007)
Creating the Market University: Science, the State, and the Economy, 1965--1985
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001560644/)
Be the first to comment!