Kertcher, Zack (Author)
Evolutionary and revolutionary approaches have dominated the study of scientific, technological and institutional change. Yet, being focused on change within a single field, these approaches have been mute about a third, pervasive process. This process is found in a variety of cases that range from open source software to the Monte Carlo method to informatics--the work of individuals and organizations to integrate knowledge, technology, organizational structures and practices across fields. The aim of this manuscript is to explore and develop theory about this third model of change, which I term "institutional expansion." The research context consists of a computer technology called grid computing and global networks of scientific innovators, firms, and adopters in a variety of fields of science and industry. Using in-depth interviews, a year-long ethnography and extensive archival analysis, I identify several mechanisms that underlie multi-field institutional expansion. Extending social network and actor-network theory, I suggest "co-linking" to be a principal mean of expansion. Striving to broaden the adoption of the technology they develop, innovators link-up with entrepreneurial adopters in fields that have generalizable problems. However, by collaborating with adopters to develop technologies that address new problems, innovators disrupt development trajectories traditionally pursued in their own field. While co-linking results in technological and institutional change, I claim that it also leads to the creation of entirely new areas of work. By conducting in-depth studies of grid development projects, I also consider the challenges facing innovators and entrepreneurial adopters who seek pervasive adoption in different fields. While current research on the diffusion of innovation suggests that innovation flows through social networks, I contend that three types of cultural and cognitive gaps hinder this process. Findings strongly indicate that collaborators utilize human, organizational and technological "adapters" to translate practices and knowledge across culturally incompatible fields and enable institutional expansion. Finally, this research seeks to explore the coordination of meaning of a meta-category, such as grid computing. Building on boundary object theory and considering the work of over 1,000 organizations that sought to develop grid standards, I suggest that, like the ancient parable of the blind men and the elephant, groups of participants were able to participate by focusing on different aspects of the grid elephant. Conflict, however, occurred when other elephants emerged in this ecology and vied for resources. I claim that these conflicts among elephants led to fundamental transformations of the studied technology. References * References (246)
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 71/07 (2011). Pub. no. AAT 3408548.
Article
Sébastien Plutniak;
(2021)
Assyrian merchants meet nuclear physicists: History of the early contributions from social sciences to computer science. The case of automatic pattern detection in graphs (1950s–1970s)
(/p/isis/citation/CBB594091280/)
Thesis
David, Shay;
(2008)
Open Systems in Practice and Theory: The Social Construction of Participatory Information Networks
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001561396/)
Thesis
Gozubuyuk, Remzi;
(2007)
The Position of the Firm in Scientific and Alliance Networks: Social Structural Determinants of Innovation in the United States Biotechnology Industry, 1990--2002
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001561531/)
Thesis
Hicks, Marie;
(2009)
Compiling Inequalities: Computerization in the British Civil Service and Nationalized Industries, 1940--1979
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001561177/)
Book
B. Jack Copeland;
Carl J. Posy;
Oron Shagrir;
(2015)
Computability: Turing, Gödel, Church, and Beyond
(/p/isis/citation/CBB900019272/)
Article
Jue Hou;
(2021)
The Cybernetic Writing Pad: Information Technology and the Retheorization of the Chinese Script, 1977-1986
(/p/isis/citation/CBB098627664/)
Article
Shelburne, B. J.;
(2012)
The ENIAC's 1949 Determination of π
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001211136/)
Article
Sugimoto, Mai;
(2013)
Edmund C. Berkeley as a Popularizer and an Educator of Computers and Symbolic Logic
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001214346/)
Article
Haigh, Thomas;
Priestley, Mark;
Rope, Crispin;
(2014)
Engineering “The Miracle of the ENIAC”: Implementing the Modern Code Paradigm
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001214453/)
Book
Daylight, Edgar G.;
Grave, Kurt De;
(2012)
The Dawn of Software Engineering: From Turing to Dijkstra
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001214448/)
Article
Haigh, Thomas;
Priestley, Mark;
Rope, Crispin;
(2014)
Reconsidering the Stored-Program Concept
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001214436/)
Article
Dujnic, Josef;
Fristacký, Norbert;
Molnár, Ludovít;
Plander, Ivan;
Rovan, Branislav;
(1999)
On the History of Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Computer Technology Development in Slovakia
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000112026/)
Article
Baber, Robert L.;
(1997)
Comparison of Electrical “Engineering” of Heaviside's Times and Software “Engineering” of Our Times
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000111225/)
Book
Daylight, Edgar G.;
Naur, Peter;
De Grave, Kurt;
(2011)
Pluralism in Software Engineering: Turing Award Winner Peter Naur Explains
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001214446/)
Book
Cyrus C. M. Mody;
(2016)
The Long Arm of Moore's Law: Microelectronics and American Science
(/p/isis/citation/CBB672178064/)
Article
Svilpis, Janis;
(2008)
The Science-Fiction Prehistory of the Turing Test
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001031078/)
Review
Christopher P. Porter;
(2019)
Review of "Computability: Turing, Gödel, Church, and Beyond"
(/p/isis/citation/CBB429673039/)
Article
Mote, C. D.;
(Winter 2020)
Ruth Davis, Tech Pioneer
(/p/isis/citation/CBB315440638/)
Article
Gower, John;
(2008)
The Biological Stimulus to Multidimensional Data Analysis
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001021404/)
Article
Cooper, S. Barry;
(2012)
Incomputability after Alan Turing
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001211736/)
Be the first to comment!