Smith, Lindsay Adams (Author)
This ethnographic dissertation examines DNA identification technologies and their relationship to political, social and familial reconstitution in post-dictatorship Argentina. In the wake of the widespread terror of the 1976-1983 dictatorship, Argentine mothers and grandmothers had the dubious honor of being the first group worldwide to organize around genetic technologies as tools for human rights. This dissertation focuses on these women, who now make up two major human rights groups: one organized around the recovery of their kidnapped grandchildren and the other organized around the identification of the bodies of the 30,000 disappeared. Drawing on rich personal narratives and interviews with scientists and family members affected by violence, I argue that DNA is a particularly powerful human rights technology because it is able to simultaneously work at various levels of social life. I thus focus on three interconnected social spaces--the interpersonal, the familial, and the national--tracing the mutability and movement of DNA quite literally from bodies, to labs, to courtrooms, to international halls of power. By examining the day-to-day reality of human rights advocacy, I document the ways in which DNA technologies figure in that project both discursively, as a powerful metaphor for family and disordered national identity, and practically, as a tool for criminal prosecution and the restitution of identity of both the living and the dead. My research suggests that forensic DNA identification technologies have emerged as core sites of identity formation for individuals and families affected by the terror of the dictatorship as well as for the Argentine nation-state as it tries to reckon with the legacies of repression. This dissertation contributes to broader questions in the social sciences and humanities chronicling, on a theoretical level, the dialectical relationship between violence, social meaning-making, and scientific process and, on an ethnographic level, how people in the midst of terribly difficult situations make complex ethical decisions about the application and meaning of new technologies. Moreover in focusing on the coproduction of political and scientific orders, this research contributes new perspectives on traditional post-conflict questions about justice, and meaning making and offers an important account of the increasingly central role of science in human rights work.
...MoreDescription “Examines DNA identification technologies and their relationship to political, social and familial reconstitution in post-dictatorship Argentina.” (from the abstract) Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/10 (2009). Pub. no. AAT 3334796.
Article
Lindsay A. Smith;
(June 2017)
The missing, the martyred and the disappeared: Global networks, technical intensification and the end of human rights genetics
(/p/isis/citation/CBB394353274/)
Article
Noa Vaisman;
(January 2018)
The Human, Human Rights, and DNA Identity Tests
(/p/isis/citation/CBB181652030/)
Article
Chow-White, Peter A.;
García-Sancho, Miguel;
(2012)
Bidirectional Shaping and Spaces of Convergence: Interactions between Biology and Computing from the First DNA Sequencers to Global Genome Databases
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001250230/)
Article
Gisler, Priska;
Kurath, Monika;
(2011)
Paradise Lost? “Science” and “the Public” after Asilomar
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001250216/)
Article
Yi, Doogab;
(2011)
Who Owns What? Private Ownership and the Public Interest in Recombinant DNA Technology in the 1970s
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001220006/)
Article
Mayrhofer, Michaela Th.;
(2013)
About the New Significance and the Contingent Meaning of Biological Material and Data in Biobanks
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001420757/)
Article
Yi, Doogab;
(2008)
Cancer, Viruses, and Mass Migration: Paul Berg's Venture into Eukaryotic Biology and the Advent of Recombinant DNA Research and Technology, 1967--1980
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000850680/)
Article
Susie Fisher;
(2015)
Not just “a clever way to detect whether DNA really made RNA”: The invention of DNA–RNA hybridization and its outcome
(/p/isis/citation/CBB180012524/)
Article
Alyssa Botelho;
(2021)
The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000261857/)
Article
O'Malley, Maureen A.;
Elliott, Kevin C.;
Burian, Richard M.;
(2010)
From Genetic to Genomic Regulation: Iterativity in MicroRNA Research
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001023979/)
Article
Nagai, Hiroyuki;
Nukaga, Yoshio;
Saeki, Koji;
Akabayashi, Akira;
(2009)
Self-Regulation of Recombinant DNA Technology in Japan in the 1970s
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000953471/)
Article
Chadarevian, Soraya de;
(2011)
The Making of an Entrepreneurial Science: Biotechnology in Britain, 1975--1995
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001220015/)
Thesis
Derksen, Linda Anne;
(2003)
Agency and Structure in the History of DNA Profiling: The Stabilization and Standardization of a New Technology
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001562352/)
Thesis
Jones, Mary Ellen;
(1999)
Politically Corrected Science: The Early Negotiation of United States Agricultural Biotechnology Policy
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001560555/)
Book
Fredrickson, Donald S.;
(2001)
The Recombinant DNA Controversy, A Memoir: Science, Politics, and the Public Interest 1974-1981
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000101022/)
Book
Krude, Torsten;
(2004)
DNA: Changing Science and Society
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000330866/)
Article
Kreimer, Pablo;
Levin, Luciano;
Jensen, Pablo;
(2011)
Popularization by Argentine Researchers: The Activities and Motivations of CONICET Scientists
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001034659/)
Book
Schmidt, Markus;
(2009)
Synthetic Biology: The Technoscience and Its Societal Consequences
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001031780/)
Article
McEuen, Paul L.;
(2012)
Small Machines
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001320103/)
Book
Rose, Nikolas S.;
(2007)
Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000950785/)
Be the first to comment!