IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB001421511

Defining a Discovery: Priority and Methodological Controversy in Early Nineteenth-Century Anatomy (2014)

Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Volume: 68, no. 4
Issue: 4
Pages: 357-372
Publication date: 2014
Language: English

DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2014.0028

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Anatomy Natural theology Physicians; doctors Physiology Vivisection 19th century Great Britain France Bell, Charles Magendie, François

In the early nineteenth century, Charles Bell and François Magendie engaged in a decades-long priority dispute over the discovery of the roots of motor and sensory nerves. The constantly recalibrated arguments of its participants illuminate changes in the life sciences during that period. When Bell first wrote about the nerves in 1811, surgeon-anatomists ran small schools out of their homes, natural theology was in vogue, exchanges between British and French medical practitioners were limited by the Napoleonic Wars, and British practitioners typically rejected experimental physiology and vivisection. By the end of Magendie's career, medical science was produced in the laboratory, taught through artfully produced performances of the sort at which Magendie excelled, and disseminated through journals. It is not entirely clear which historical character, Bell or Magendie, `won' the dispute, nor that they even had clear and consistent positions in it, but what is clear is that one style of science had won out over the other, and over the course of the dispute, pedagogy lost pride of place in medical science.

...More

Citation URI

data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB001421511

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Berkowitz, Carin; (2006)
Disputed Discovery: Vivisection and Experiment in the 19th Century

Article Lisner, Wiebke; (2009)
Experimente am lebendigen Leib: Zur Frage der Vivisektion in deutschen und britischen medizinischen Wochenschriften 1919--1939

Article Feller, David Allan; (2009)
Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Antivivisection Controversy of 1875

Article Mayer, Jed; (2008)
The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Laboratory Animals

Article Cunningham, Andrew; (2002)
The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy before 1800: I: Old Physiology---The Pen

Article Carmela Morabito; (2017)
David Ferrier’s Experimental Localization of Cerebral Functions and the Anti-Vivisection Debate

Article Berkowitz, Carin; (2014)
Charles Bell's Seeing Hand: Teaching Anatomy to the Senses in Britain, 1750--1840

Book Carin Berkowitz; (2015)
Charles Bell and the Anatomy of Reform

Book Cranefield, Paul F.; (1974)
The way in and the way out: François Magendie, Charles Bell, and the roots of the spinal nerves. With a facsimile of Charles Bell's annotated copy of his Ideas of a new anatomy of the brain

Article Gallistel, C. R.; (1981)
Bell, Magendie, and the proposals to restrict the use of animals in neurobehavioral research

Article Rice, Gillian; (1987)
The Bell-Magendie-Walker controversy

Article Jørgensen, C. Barker; (2003)
Aspects of the History of the Nerves: Bell's Theory, the Bell-Magendie Law and Controversy, and Two Forgotten Works by P. W. Lund and D. F. Eschricht

Chapter Julius Rocca; (2016)
Anatomy and Physiology

Thesis Stelmackowich, Cindy Lee; (2010)
Bodies of Knowledge: Nineteenth Century Anatomical Atlases, 1800--1860

Article Boddice, Rob; (2011)
Vivisecting Major: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876--1885

Chapter Milburn, Colin; (2008)
Wissenschaft aus der Hölle: Jack the Ripper und die viktorianische Vivisektion

Chapter Marsden, Simon; (2007)
Dr. Moreau's Crimes: H. G. Wells and the Victorian Vivisection Controversy

Article Feller, David A.; (2009)
Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Anti-Vivisection Controversy of 1875

Book Broghammer, Herbert; (2000)
Experimentelle Physiologie und mikroskopische Anatomie in der Nachromantik: Rudolf Peter Heinrich Heidenhain (1834-1897)

Book Elwick, James; (2007)
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820--1858