Although Newton carefully eschews questions about gravity's causal basis in the published Principia, the original version of his masterwork's third book contains some intriguing causal language. These forces, he writes, arise from the universal nature of matter. Such remarks seem to assert knowledge of gravity's cause, even that matter is capable of robust and distant action. Some commentators defend that interpretation of the text---a text whose proper interpretation is important since Newton's reasons for suppressing it strongly suggest that he continued to endorse its ideas. This article argues that the surface appearance of Newton's causal language is deceptive. What does Newton intend with his causal language if not a full causal hypothesis? His remarks actually indicate a way of considering the force mathematically, something he contrasts to the structure of the force as it really is in nature. In explaining that, he identifies a significant disjunction between the physical force itself and mathematical ways of considering it, and the text's significance lies in its view of the force's structure and in the questions raised about the relationship between mathematical representations and the physical world.
...More
Article
Adwait A. Parker;
(2020)
Newton on active and passive quantities of matter
(/p/isis/citation/CBB738730801/)
Thesis
Kochiras, Hylarie;
(2008)
Force, Matter, and Metaphysics in Newton's Natural Philosophy
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001561168/)
Essay Review
Guicciardini, Niccolò;
(2013)
Harper and Ducheyne on Newton
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001566365/)
Book
Harper, William L.;
(2011)
Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001221264/)
Article
Henry, John;
(2011)
Gravity and De Gravitatione: The Development Of Newton's Ideas on Action at a Distance
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001024137/)
Article
John Henry;
(2020)
Primary and Secondary Causation in Samuel Clarke’s and Isaac Newton’s Theories of Gravity
(/p/isis/citation/CBB866910656/)
Chapter
Huggett, Nick;
(2012)
What Did Newton Mean by “Absolute Motion”?
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001500345/)
Article
Janiak, Andrew;
(2010)
Substance and Action in Descartes and Newton
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001221446/)
Article
Maglo, Koffi;
(2007)
Force, Mathematics, and Physics in Newton's Principia: A New Approach to Enduring Issues
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000850280/)
Article
Pourciau, Bruce;
(2007)
From Centripetal Forces to Conic Orbits: A Path through the Early Sections of Newton's Principia
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000771901/)
Article
Pourciau, Bruce;
(2007)
Force, Deflection, and Time: Proposition VI of Newton's Principia
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000771359/)
Article
John Henry;
(2023)
Newton's ‘De Aere et Aethere’ and the introduction of interparticulate forces into his physics
(/p/isis/citation/CBB856534771/)
Article
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni;
(2006)
Inherent and Centrifugal Forces in Newton
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000670062/)
Article
Coelho, Ricardo Lopes;
(2007)
The Law of Inertia: How Understanding Its History Can Improve Physics Teaching
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001032892/)
Book
Bodanis, David;
(2000)
E=MC2: A Biography of the World's Most Famous Equation
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000101939/)
Chapter
Smith, George E.;
(2012)
How Newton's Principia Changed Physics
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001500352/)
Chapter
Marius Stan;
(2017)
Newton’s Concepts of Force among the Leibnizians
(/p/isis/citation/CBB491004939/)
Article
Hepburn, Brian;
(2010)
Euler, vis viva, and Equilibrium
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001021663/)
Chapter
Watkins, Eric;
(2001)
Kant on Extension and Force: Critical Appropriations of Leibniz and Newton
(/p/isis/citation/CBB000101472/)
Article
Dunlop, Katherine;
(2012)
The Mathematical Form of Measurement and the Argument for Proposition I in Newton's Principia
(/p/isis/citation/CBB001211480/)
Be the first to comment!