Article ID: CBB000410725

Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions (2003)

unapi

Vermaas, Pieter E. (Author)
Houkes, Wybo (Author)


British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume: 54
Pages: 261--289
Publication date: 2003
Language: English


The aim of this paper is to evaluate etiological accounts of functions for the domain of technical artefacts. Etiological theories ascribe functions to items on the basis of the causal histories of those items; they apply relatively straightforwardly to the biological domain, in which neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory provides a well-developed and generally accepted background for describing the causal histories of biological items. Yet there is no well-developed and generally accepted theory for describing the causal history of artefacts, so the application of etiological theories to the technical domain is hardly straightforward. In this paper we consider the transposition of etiological theories in general from the biological to the technical domain. We argue that a number of etiological theories that appear defensible for biology become untenable for technology. We illustrate our argument by showing that the standard etiological accounts of Neander and Millikan, and some recent attempts to improve on them, provide examples of such untenable theories. 1 Introduction 2 Desiderata for theories of functions 3 Etiological theories in general 3.1 Common core and divergent aims 3.2 Reproduction versus non-reproduction etiological theories 3.3 Intentionalist versus non-intentionalist etiological theories 4 Problems for etiological theories in the technical domain 5 The failure of existing reproduction theories 6 The failure of existing non-reproduction theories 7 Improving reproduction by hybridisation 8 Conclusions

...More

Description Looks at the topic through a case study of neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory.


Citation URI
data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB000410725

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Similar Citations

Article Miguel García-Valdecasas; Terrence W. Deacon; (2024)
Biological functions are causes, not effects: A critique of selected effects theories (/p/isis/citation/CBB854874311/) unapi

Article Birch, Jonathan; (2012)
The Negative View of Natural Selection (/p/isis/citation/CBB001221639/) unapi

Thesis Hendrikse, Jesse Love; (2006)
Explanation and Inheritance (/p/isis/citation/CBB001561700/) unapi

Book Koons, Robert C.; (2000)
Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind (/p/isis/citation/CBB000410586/) unapi

Article Karina Alleva; José Díez; Lucia Federico; (2017)
Models, theory structure and mechanisms in biochemistry: The case of allosterism (/p/isis/citation/CBB541545262/) unapi

Article Sober, Elliott; Hecht Orzack, Steven; (2003)
Common Ancestry and Natural Selection (/p/isis/citation/CBB000410733/) unapi

Article Matthen, Mohan; (2003)
Is Sex Really Necessary? And Other Questions for Lewens (/p/isis/citation/CBB000410727/) unapi

Thesis Goldstein, Adam; (2006)
Random Drift: Chance and Explanation in Evolutionary Biology (/p/isis/citation/CBB001561699/) unapi

Article Lauren N. Ross; (2021)
Causal Concepts in Biology: How Pathways Differ from Mechanisms and Why It Matters (/p/isis/citation/CBB579689608/) unapi

Article Weber, Bruce H.; (2007)
Fact, Phenomenon, and Theory in the Darwinian Research Tradition (/p/isis/citation/CBB001230132/) unapi

Article Pierrick Bourrat; (2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem (/p/isis/citation/CBB530242611/) unapi

Article Philippe Huneman; (2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation (/p/isis/citation/CBB392966411/) unapi

Book Gissis, Snait B.; Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology (/p/isis/citation/CBB001500079/) unapi

Article Wagner, Andreas; (2012)
The Role of Randomness in Darwinian Evolution (/p/isis/citation/CBB001210577/) unapi

Chapter Beurton, Peter; (2002)
Zur Ausbildung der synthetischen Theorie der biologischen Evolution (/p/isis/citation/CBB000500679/) unapi

Book Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice; Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira; Stefano, Waldir; (2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1 (/p/isis/citation/CBB000820181/) unapi

Book Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyer Pereira; (2007)
A Teoria da Progressão dos Animais, de Lamark (/p/isis/citation/CBB000820176/) unapi

Article Victor J. Luque; (2016)
The Principle of Stasis: Why drift is not a Zero-Cause Law (/p/isis/citation/CBB000574296/) unapi

Article Eric Muszynski; Christophe Malaterre; (2020)
Best behaviour: A proposal for a non-binary conceptualization of behaviour in biology (/p/isis/citation/CBB398367862/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyer Pereira
Beurton, Peter
Birch, Jonathan
Brzezinski Prestes, María Elice de
Díez, José A.
Federico, Lucía
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Biological Theory
Biology and Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Publishers
Bookmark
Fundo Mackenzie de Pesquisa
Johns Hopkins University
Oxford University Press
The MIT Press
University of Calgary (Canada)
Concepts
Biology
Philosophy of biology
Evolution
Explanation; hypotheses; theories
Darwinism
Causality
People
Lamarck, Jean Baptiste Antoine Pierre de Monet de
Hempel, Carl G.
Jennings, Herbert Spencer
Senebier, Jean
Time Periods
19th century
20th century
21st century
18th century
20th century, late
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment