Article ID: CBB000261857

The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy (2021)

unapi

Botelho, Alyssa (Author)


Science as Culture
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Pages: 74-103
Publication date: 2021
Language: English


In the wake of controversy over human embryonic gene-editing with CRISPR/Cas9 technology, scientists have looked repeatedly to the 1975 Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA (rDNA) as a model for adjudicating gene-editing today. However, STS scholars have long critiqued Asilomar as a case of insular scientific self-regulation, and other histories from the early biotech years offer fresh insights for those pursuing an equitable gene-editing landscape in the CRISPR era. Some of the first scientists to approach genetic engineering with a deep understanding of power were the biologists in the radical movement Science for the People (SftP). In 1976, SftP learned that Harvard University was planning to build a high-containment facility for rDNA and fostered a unique moment of democratic technoscientific governance in Cambridge. SftP’s radical framework for regulating rDNA differed from Asilomar’s liberal approach in important ways. While their colleagues at Asilomar ignored the social consequences of rDNA, SftP biologists produced incisive analyses of genetic reductionism, the commercialization of biotechnology, and the public regulation of science – and shared their ideas widely. Along the way, they fostered important intellectual connections with an early community of radical and feminist science studies scholars who were investigating emerging issues around genetic engineering.

...More
Included in

Article Peter J. Taylor; Karin Patzke (2021) From Radical Science to STS. Science as Culture (pp. 1-10). unapi

Citation URI
data.isiscb.org/p/isis/citation/CBB000261857

This citation is part of the Isis database.

Similar Citations

Book Jennifer A. Doudna; Samuel H. Sternberg; (2017)
A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution (/p/isis/citation/CBB535457038/) unapi

Article Morgan Meyer; (2022)
Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility: Controversies in human gene editing (/p/isis/citation/CBB072011815/) unapi

Book John H. Evans; (2020)
The Human Gene Editing Debate (/p/isis/citation/CBB424000521/) unapi

Article Gisler, Priska; Kurath, Monika; (2011)
Paradise Lost? “Science” and “the Public” after Asilomar (/p/isis/citation/CBB001250216/) unapi

Article Nagai, Hiroyuki; Nukaga, Yoshio; Saeki, Koji; Akabayashi, Akira; (2009)
Self-Regulation of Recombinant DNA Technology in Japan in the 1970s (/p/isis/citation/CBB000953471/) unapi

Article Christian Ross; (2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing (/p/isis/citation/CBB828766557/) unapi

Book Charles Lawson; Berris Charnley; (2015)
Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Convergence in Laws (/p/isis/citation/CBB742382287/) unapi

Article Andrew J. Hogan; (2016)
From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering (/p/isis/citation/CBB750225154/) unapi

Article Kelly Moore; (2021)
Capitalisms, Generative Projects and the New STS (/p/isis/citation/CBB341784553/) unapi

Book Sahotra Sarkar; (2021)
Cut-and-Paste Genetics: A CRISPR Revolution (/p/isis/citation/CBB564028363/) unapi

Book Walter Isaacson; (2021)
The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race (/p/isis/citation/CBB677514543/) unapi

Book Yi, Doogab; (2015)
The Recombinant University: Genetic Engineering and the Emergence of Stanford Biotechnology (/p/isis/citation/CBB001510017/) unapi

Book Bailey, Britt; Lappé, Marc; (2002)
Engineering the Farm: Ethical and Social Aspects of Agricultural Biotechnology (/p/isis/citation/CBB000201287/) unapi

Article Dooren, Thom Van; (2007)
Terminated Seed: Death, Proprietary Kinship and the Production of (Bio)Wealth (/p/isis/citation/CBB000720317/) unapi

Article Cuevas-Badallo, Ana; Vermaas, Pieter E.; (2011)
A Functional ABC for Biotechnology and the Dissemination of Its Progeny (/p/isis/citation/CBB001024012/) unapi

Article Palladino, Paolo; (2003)
Life...On Biology, Biography, and Bio-power in the Age of Genetic Engineering (/p/isis/citation/CBB000500944/) unapi

Book Carlson, Robert H.; (2010)
Biology Is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life (/p/isis/citation/CBB001251428/) unapi

Thesis Emrich, John S.; (2009)
Dr. Genelove: How Scientists Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Recombinant DNA (/p/isis/citation/CBB001560743/) unapi

Article Chow-White, Peter A.; García-Sancho, Miguel; (2012)
Bidirectional Shaping and Spaces of Convergence: Interactions between Biology and Computing from the First DNA Sequencers to Global Genome Databases (/p/isis/citation/CBB001250230/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Yi, Doogab
Akabayashi, Akira
Bailey, Britt
Carlson, Robert H.
Charnley, Berris
Chow-White, Peter A.
Journals
Science as Culture
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology
Endeavour: Review of the Progress of Science
Historia Scientiarum: International Journal of the History of Science Society of Japan
Journal of the History of Biology
Publishers
Harvard University Press
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Island Press
Oxford University Press
Routledge
Rowman & Littlefield
Concepts
Genetic engineering
Biotechnology
CRISPR-Cas9
DNA; RNA
Science and technology studies (STS)
Biology and ethics; bioethics
People
Doudna, Jennifer
Berg, Paul
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
Places
Japan
United States
San Francisco (California)
Institutions
Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules (1975)
Stanford University
Human Genome Project
Science for the People (SftP)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment