Yagel Gouvêa, Devin Susanne (Author)
There is widespread agreement that “homology” designates something of fundamental biological importance, but no consensus as to how precisely that “something” should be defined, recognized, or theorized. Philosophical observers of this situation commonly focus on tensions between historical and mechanistic explications of homological sameness by appeal, respectively, to common ancestry and shared developmental resources. This paper uses select historical episodes to decenter those tensions and challenge standard narratives about how they arose. Haas and Simpson (1946) influentially defined “homology” simply as “similarity due to common ancestry.” They claimed historical precedent in Lankester (1870) but seriously oversimplified his views in the process. Lankester did prioritize common ancestry, but he also raised mechanistic questions that resonate with contemporary evo devo work on homology. The rise of genetics inspired similar speculations in twentieth-century workers like Boyden (1943), a zoologist who engaged Simpson in a 15-year debate over homology. Though he shared Simpson's devotion to taxonomy and his interest in evolutionary history, he favored a more operational and less theoretical homology concept. Their dispute is poorly captured by current analyses of the homology problem. It calls for further study of the complex relationship between concepts and the epistemic goals they serve.
...More
Thesis
Devin Susanne Yagel Gouvêa;
(2021)
Essentially Dynamic Concepts and the Case of "Homology"
Article
Pedroso, Makmiller;
(2012)
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa
Book
Richard A. Richards;
(2016)
Biological Classification: A Philosophical Introduction
Book
Maureen O'Malley;
(2014)
Philosophy of Microbiology
Article
Andrea Gambarotto;
Auguste Nahas;
(2022)
Teleology and the organism: Kant's controversial legacy for contemporary biology
Book
Wilkins, John S.;
(2009)
Species: A History of the Idea
Article
Christopher H. Pearson;
(2018)
Theoricity and Homology: A Reply to Roffe, Ginnobili, and Blanco
Thesis
Brigandt, Ingo;
(2006)
A Theory of Conceptual Advance: Explaining Conceptual Change in Evolutionary, Molecular, and Evolutionary Developmental Biology
Article
Isabel Gabel;
(2018)
La biologie, la réflexivité et l’histoire: Réinscrire Canguilhem dans son milieu
Book
Burian, Richard M.;
(2005)
The Epistemology of Development, Evolution, and Genetics: Selected Essays
Essay Review
Griffiths, Paul E.;
(2002)
Lost: One Gene Concept. Reward to Finder
Article
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger;
(2020)
Two Books that Marked their Epoch – A Personal Encounter
Article
Jean-Michel Claverie;
Chantal Abergel;
(2016)
Giant viruses: The difficult breaking of multiple epistemological barriers
Book
Creath, Richard;
Maienschein, Jane;
(2000)
Biology and epistemology
Book
Brian Garvey;
(2007)
Philosophy of Biology
Article
Ebach, Malte C.;
Williams, David M.;
(2007)
An Outline of the Foundations of Systematics and Biogeography
Article
Ben Bradley;
(2022)
Natural selection according to Darwin: Cause or effect?
Book
Richard G. Delisle;
Maurizio Esposito;
David Ceccarelli;
(2024)
Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology: Deconstructing Darwinism
Article
Koen B. Tanghe;
(2017)
A Historical Taxonomy of Origin of Species Problems and Its Relevance to the Historiography of Evolutionary Thought
Chapter
Sébastien Plutniak;
Sophie Beaune;
Alessandro Guidi;
Oscar Moro Abadía;
Massimo Tarantini;
(2021)
Abstraction in Archaeological Stratigraphy: a Pyrenean Lineage of Innovation (late 19th-early 21th century
Be the first to comment!