Article ID: CBB992016943

Darwin and the golden rule: how to distinguish differences of degree from differences of kind using mechanisms (2022)

unapi

Darwin claimed that human and animal minds differ in degree but not in kind, and that ethical principles such as the Golden Rule are just an extension of thinking found in animals. Both claims are false. The best way to distinguish differences in degree from differences in kind is by identifying mechanisms that have emergent properties. Recursive thinking is an emergent capability found in humans but not in other animals. The Golden Rule and some other ethical principles such as Kant’s categorical imperative require recursion, so they constitute ethical thinking that is restricted to humans. Changes in kind have tipping points resulting from mechanisms with emergent properties.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB992016943/

Similar Citations

Book Prochiantz, Alain; (2010)
Darwin, 200 ans

Thesis Booth, Kelvin Jay; (2007)
Animal Mind, Human Mind: George H. Mead, Animality and the Evolution of Embodied Cognition

Book Richter, Virginia; (2011)
Literature after Darwin: Human Beasts in Western Fiction, 1859--1939

Article Day, Matthew; (2008)
Godless Savages and Superstitious Dogs: Charles Darwin, Imperial Ethnography, and the Problem of Human Uniqueness

Article Armon, Rony; (2010)
Beyond Darwinism's Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s.

Article Woolcock, Peter G.; (2000)
Objectivity and Illusion in Evolutionary Ethics: Comments on Waller

Article Takacs, Peter; Ruse, Michael; (2013)
The Current Status of the Philosophy of Biology

Book Allen Buchanan; (2020)
Our Moral Fate: Evolution and the Escape from Tribalism

Essay Review Agar, Nicholas; (2002)
The Ethical Ape

Article Lahti, David C.; (2003)
Parting with Illusions in Evolutionary Ethics

Book Waal, Frans de; Macedo, Stephen; Ober, Josiah; Wright, Robert; (2006)
Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved

Chapter Descamps, Philippe; (2010)
Le sacre de l'espèce humaine ou comment le droit français se préoccupe de l'évolution de l'homme

Thesis Sripada, Chandra Sekhar; (2005)
Conceptual Foundations for the Psychology and Evolution of Morality

Article Don Fallis; Peter J. Lewis; (2021)
Animal deception and the content of signals

Article Naomi Beck; (2016)
The spontaneous market order and evolution

Article Hale, Piers J.; (2013)
Monkeys into Men and Men into Monkeys: Chance and Contingency in the Evolution of Man, Mind and Morals in Charles Kingsley's Water Babies

Book Crook, Paul; (2007)
Darwin's Coat-Tails: Essays on Social Darwinism

Chapter Engels, Eve-Marie; (2009)
Charles Darwins evolutionäre Theorie der Erkenntnis- und Moralfähigkeit

Chapter Knight, David; (2011)
The Law of Higgledy-pigglety: Charles Darwin's Inheritance, his Legacy and the Moral Order of Nature

Chapter Rauprich, Oliver; (2009)
Charles Darwin und die Evolutionäre Ethik

Authors & Contributors
Agar, Nicholas
Armon, Rony
Beck, Naomi
Booth, Kelvin Jay
Buchanan, Allen
Crook, Paul
Journals
Biology and Philosophy
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Journal of the History of Biology
Journal of the History of Ideas
Science and Education
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Publishers
Rutgers University
Odile Jacob
Palgrave Macmillan
Peter Lang
Princeton University Press
The MIT Press
Concepts
Evolution and ethics
Human evolution
Evolution
Evolutionary psychology
Biology
Human-animal relationships
People
Darwin, Charles Robert
Kingsley, Charles
Mead, George Herbert
Spencer, Herbert
Time Periods
19th century
20th century, early
20th century, late
20th century
Places
Great Britain
France
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment