Friedrich Engels' dialectical assessment of modern science resulted from his fascination with the natural sciences (cell physiology, thermodynamics, theory of evolution) in combination with his resurging interest in the work of “old Hegel.” Engels became especially interested in what he saw as the molecular essence of life, namely proteins or, more specifically, albumin (Eiweiß), seeing life as the mode of existence of these enigmatic substances. Hegelian dialectics is crucial for a dialectical materialist understanding of contemporary technoscience. The dialectical materialist understanding of technoscience as a research practice builds on Engels, but also on later (scientific) authors who were inspired by his writings, e.g., life scientists such as Haldane and Bernal. Considering the criticism raised against Engels' dialectics by 20th-century Marxists, a dialectical diagnostic of contemporary technoscience can be achieved, which shifts the focus from artificial albumin as “living matter” (as discussed by Engels) to contemporary research on synthetic cells (as anticipated by Engels).
...More
Article
Fabio Lusito;
(2023)
The scientia case: scientific censorship and ideological struggles, 1973-1975
(/isis/citation/CBB961108556/)
Article
Konstantin A. Tomilin;
(2019)
Physicists and Philosophers in Discussions around the Theory of Relativity
(/isis/citation/CBB972709839/)
Article
Koji Kanayama;
(2021)
A Japanese Physicist Meets Socialist Natural Philosophy: SAKATA Shōichi (1911-1970) and Dialectical Materialism
(/isis/citation/CBB532163613/)
Article
Massimiliano Simons;
(2021)
Synthetic biology as a technoscience: The case of minimal genomes and essential genes
(/isis/citation/CBB407365411/)
Chapter
Mauro Stenico;
(2015)
Mundus est fabula: la cosmologia e i grandi interrogativi
(/isis/citation/CBB234454455/)
Article
Hiroshi Ichikawa;
(2019)
Materialist Perestroika of Quantum Dynamics and Soviet Ideology: Yakov Petrovich Terletskii (1912‒1993)
(/isis/citation/CBB251482593/)
Article
Claire Marris;
Jane Calvert;
(2020)
Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap
(/isis/citation/CBB160780807/)
Article
Sara Giordano;
(May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics
(/isis/citation/CBB369714455/)
Article
Jane Calvery;
Pablo Schyfter;
(April 2017)
What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’
(/isis/citation/CBB521887641/)
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
(/isis/citation/CBB650192444/)
Article
Anja Bauer;
Alexander Bogner;
(2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues
(/isis/citation/CBB333309152/)
Article
Hannah Landecker;
(2016)
It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds
(/isis/citation/CBB598422047/)
Book
A. Balmer;
K. Bulpin;
S. Molyneux-Hodgson;
(2016)
Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices
(/isis/citation/CBB471073110/)
Thesis
Kouper, Inna;
(2011)
The Meanings of (Synthetic) Life: A Study of Science Information as Discourse
(/isis/citation/CBB001567283/)
Chapter
Daniela Steila;
(2018)
La fortuna di Mach nella Russia pre-rivoluzionaria
(/isis/citation/CBB928582006/)
Book
Angelo Calemme;
(2022)
Dalla Rivoluzione scientifica alla Rivoluzione industriale: Sulle condizioni marxiane dello sviluppo scientifico-tecnico
(/isis/citation/CBB025108270/)
Book
Giulia Rispoli;
(2012)
Dall’empiriomonismo alla tectologia. Organizzazione, complessità e approccio sistemico nel pensiero di Aleksandr Bogdanov
(/isis/citation/CBB935591953/)
Article
Zhengfeng Li;
Xiao Lu;
(June 2018)
Reflections on STS in Mainland China: A Historical Review
(/isis/citation/CBB335089393/)
Article
Yuanlin Guo;
(2014)
The Philosophy of Science and Technology in China: Political and Ideological Influences
(/isis/citation/CBB981981889/)
Article
Moya, Andrés;
(2009)
Synthetic Biology, Gödel, and the Blind Watchmaker
(/isis/citation/CBB001230119/)
Be the first to comment!