In the Second Analogy, Kant argues that every event has a cause. It remains disputed what this conclusion amounts to. Does Kant argue only for the Weak Causal Principle that every event has some cause, or for the Strong Causal Principle that every event is produced according to a universal causal law? Existing interpretations have assumed that, by Kant’s lights, there is a substantive difference between the two. I argue that this is false. Kant holds that the concept of cause contains the notion of lawful connection, so it is analytic that causes operate according to universal laws. He is explicit about this commitment, not least in his derivation of the Categorical Imperative in Groundwork III. Consequently, Kant’s move from causal rules to universal laws is much simpler than previously assumed. Given his commitments, establishing the Strong Causal Principle requires no more argument than establishing the Weak Causal Principle.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Weber, Erik;
Ylikoski, Petri;
(2005)
Preface to Special Issue Roles, Disposition and Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB000640131/)
Article
Michael Bennett McNulty;
(2015)
Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws
(/isis/citation/CBB187849312/)
Article
DiSalle, Robert;
(2013)
The Transcendental Method from Newton to Kant
(/isis/citation/CBB001320267/)
Book
Stephen Mumford;
Matthew Tugby;
(2013)
Metaphysics and Science
(/isis/citation/CBB707613342/)
Article
Nancy Cartwright;
(2016)
Contingency and the order of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB961115976/)
Book
Markus Schrenk;
(2016)
Metaphysics of Science: A Systematic and Historical Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB675008618/)
Book
Tooley, Michael;
(1999)
Laws of nature, causation, and supervenience
(/isis/citation/CBB000110601/)
Book
Hüttemann, Andreas;
(2001)
Kausalität und Naturgesetz in der Frühen Neuzeit
(/isis/citation/CBB000101516/)
Article
Boris Demarest;
Hein van den Berg;
(2022)
Kant's theory of scientific hypotheses in its historical context
(/isis/citation/CBB647015598/)
Article
Andrew Cooper;
(2023)
Hypotheses in Kant's philosophy of science
(/isis/citation/CBB066255730/)
Article
Steigerwald, Joan;
(2010)
Natural Purposes and the Reflecting Power of Judgment: The Problem of the Organism in Kant’s Critical Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB001000084/)
Article
Marco Giovanelli;
(2022)
Motivational Kantianism: Cassirer's late shift towards a regulative conception of the a priori
(/isis/citation/CBB235081280/)
Article
Jansson, Lina;
(2013)
Newton's “satis est”: A New Explanatory Role for Laws
(/isis/citation/CBB001213357/)
Book
Faye, Jan;
(2005)
Nature's Principles
(/isis/citation/CBB000650331/)
Article
Cuffaro, Michael;
(2010)
The Kantian Framework of Complementarity
(/isis/citation/CBB001024225/)
Book
Viennot, Laurence;
Debru, Claude;
(2003)
Enquête sur le concept de causalité
(/isis/citation/CBB000772846/)
Article
Schaffer, Jonathan;
(2003)
Principled Chances
(/isis/citation/CBB000410715/)
Book
John Losee;
(2017)
Complementarity, Causality and Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB037277228/)
Book
Collin Rice;
(2021)
Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB912709886/)
Article
Jason Winning;
(2020)
Mechanistic Causation and Constraints: Perspectival Parts and Powers, Non-perspectival Modal Patterns
(/isis/citation/CBB929989718/)
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
European Romantic Review
Foundations of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Be the first to comment!