Community science—scientific investigation conducted partly or entirely by non-professional scientists—has many advantages. For example, community science mobilizes large numbers of volunteers who can, at low cost, collect more data than traditional teams of professional scientists. Participation in research can also increase volunteers’ knowledge about and appreciation of science. At the same time, there are worries about the quality of data that community science projects produce. Can the work of non-professionals really deliver trustworthy results? Attempts to answer this question generally compare data collected by volunteers to data collected by professional scientists. When volunteer data is more variable or less accurate than professionally collected data, then the community science project is judged to be inferior to traditional science. I argue that this is not the right standard to use when evaluating community science, because it relies on a false assumption about the aims of science. I show that if we adopt the view that science has diverse aims which are often in tension with one another, then we cannot justify holding community science data to an expert accuracy standard. Instead, we should evaluate the quality of community science data based on its adequacy-for-purpose.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Henry M. Cowles;
Chitra Ramalingam;
(2022)
Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB356636672/)
Article
Barbara L. Allen;
(November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region
(/isis/citation/CBB069762669/)
Article
Phil Brown;
(2021)
From the Radical Psychology Movement to STS: A Journey From the 1960s in Multiple Parts
(/isis/citation/CBB099951762/)
Article
Chiou, Wen-Tsong;
(June 2019)
What Roles Can Lay Citizens Play in the Making of Public Knowledge?
(/isis/citation/CBB197683533/)
Article
Shobita Parthasarathy;
(2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser
(/isis/citation/CBB968694595/)
Article
Laura Miralles;
Eva Garcia-Vazquez;
Eduardo Dopico;
(2021)
Game-based learning for engaging citizens in biopollution control
(/isis/citation/CBB727121914/)
Article
Kristoffer Whitney;
(2020)
Valuing Shorebirds: Bureaucracy, Natural History, and Expertise in North American Conservation
(/isis/citation/CBB978624329/)
Article
Mitchell Kiefer;
(2021)
Re-basing Scientific Authority: Anthropocene Narratives in the Carnegie Natural History Museum
(/isis/citation/CBB937863298/)
Article
Melanie Leenen;
Bart Penders;
(October 2016)
Dissident Dietary Credibility: The Power of Discontent
(/isis/citation/CBB229041974/)
Article
Matthew Hayes;
Noah Morritt;
(2020)
Michael W. Burke-Gaffney and the UFO Debate in Atlantic Canada, 1947-1969
(/isis/citation/CBB417665220/)
Article
Christian Ross;
(2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
(/isis/citation/CBB828766557/)
Thesis
Christian H. Ross;
(2021)
Editing Engagement: Visions of Science, Democracy, and Responsibility in Gene Editing Discourse
(/isis/citation/CBB263669907/)
Article
Daniel Lee Kleinman;
Sainath Suryanarayanan;
(2020)
Pollinating Collaboration: Diverse Stakeholders’ Efforts to Build Experiments in the Wake of the Honey Bee Crisis
(/isis/citation/CBB482065260/)
Article
Dick Kasperowski;
Niclas Hagen;
(June 2022)
Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance
(/isis/citation/CBB251191827/)
Article
Vickie Curtis;
(December 2015)
Motivation to Participate in an Online Citizen Science Game: A Study of Foldit
(/isis/citation/CBB708636413/)
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Nina Amelung;
(October 2016)
Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement
(/isis/citation/CBB261047944/)
Article
Victoria Martin;
Liam Smith;
Alison Bowling;
Les Christidis;
David Lloyd;
Gretta Pecl;
(August 2016)
Citizens as Scientists: What Influences Public Contributions to Marine Research?
(/isis/citation/CBB408786335/)
Article
Denisa Kera;
(2017)
Science Artisans and Open Science Hardware
(/isis/citation/CBB090977579/)
Article
Fan, Fa-ti;
Chen, Shun-Ling;
Kao, Chia-Liang;
Murphy, Michelle;
Price, Matt;
Barry, Liz;
(June 2019)
Citizens, Politics, and Civic Technology: A Conversation with g0v and EDGI
(/isis/citation/CBB489307330/)
Book
Cooper, Caren B.;
(2016)
Citizen science: how ordinary people are changing the face of discovery
(/isis/citation/CBB007572607/)
Be the first to comment!