Marjoleine G. van der Meij (Author)
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse (Author)
Frank Kupper (Author)
To unravel how video-narratives can support reflection in Responsible Research and Innovation contexts, this study evaluates four video-narratives designed for citizen-reflection on synthetic biology. Each video narrative comprised separate clips about three subtopics in which actors represented different views of synthetic biology. The video-clips were presented to Dutch citizens in two different setups: per narrator and per subtopic. Both setups appeared to trigger three reflection processes and three reflection outcomes. Our findings suggest that video-narratives shown per subtopic support reflection more extensively, provided that workshop setups pay considerable attention to reflection on values and assumptions.
...More
Article
Mirko Ancillotti;
Niklas Holmberg;
Mikael Lindfelt;
Stefan Eriksson;
(2015)
Uncritical and Unbalanced Coverage of Synthetic Biology in the Nordic Press
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
Article
Achterberg, Peter;
(2014)
Knowing Hydrogen and Loving It Too? Information Provision, Cultural Predispositions, and Support for Hydrogen Technology among the Dutch
Article
Bert Theunissen;
(2019)
The Oostvaardersplassen Fiasco
Article
Anja Bauer;
Alexander Bogner;
(2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues
Article
Aleksandra Stelmach;
Brigitte Nerlich;
Sarah Hartley;
(2022)
Gene Drives in the U.K., U.S., and Australian Press (2015–2019): How a New Focus on Responsibility Is Shaping Science Communication
Book
Lee McIntyre;
(2021)
How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason
Article
Siyu Fu;
Kristian H. Nielsen;
(2023)
The humanist challenge to China’s dominant policies for popularizing science and technology (PST)
Article
Vincent, Bernadette Bensaude;
(2014)
The Politics of Buzzwords at the Interface of Technoscience, Market and Society: The Case of “Public Engagement in Science”
Article
Jan Domaradzki;
(2023)
From evil demiurge to caring hero: images of geneticists in the movies
Book
Vaughan Prain;
Brian Hand;
(2020)
Theorizing the Future of Science Education Research
Book
Kathleen Hall Jamieson;
Dan Kahan;
Dietram A. Scheufele;
(2017)
The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication
Article
Kelly Krause;
(2016)
A Framework for Visual Communication at Nature
Article
Laura Witzling;
Bret Shaw;
Michael S. Amato;
(October 2015)
Incorporating Information Exposure Into a Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Enrich Understanding of Proenvironmental Behavior
Article
Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick;
Benjamin K. Johnson;
Nathaniel A. Silver;
Axel Westerwick;
(October 2015)
Science Exemplars in the Eye of the Beholder: How Exposure to Online Science Information Affects Attitudes
Book
Charles Seife;
(2021)
Hawking Hawking: The Selling of a Scientific Celebrity
Article
Mike Zapp;
(2022)
The legitimacy of science and the populist backlash: Cross-national and longitudinal trends and determinants of attitudes toward science
Article
P. Sol Hart;
Lauren Feldman;
(August 2016)
The Impact of Climate Change–Related Imagery and Text on Public Opinion and Behavior Change
Article
Jillian L. Goldfarb;
Douglas L. Kriner;
(February 2017)
Building Public Support for Science Spending: Misinformation, Motivated Reasoning, and the Power of Corrections
Article
Karen Peterman;
Jane Robertson Evia;
Emily Cloyd;
John C. Besley;
(December 2017)
Assessing Public Engagement Outcomes by the Use of an Outcome Expectations Scale for Scientists
Be the first to comment!