Historians of science and technology and STS practitioners have always taken intellectual property very seriously but, with some notable exceptions, they have typically refrained from looking “into” it. There is mounting evidence, however, that they can open up the black box of IP as effectively as they have done for the technosciences, enriching their discipline while making significant contributions to legal studies. One approach is to look at the technologies through which patent law construes its object – the invention – in specific settings and periods by examining procedures, classifications, archives, models, repositories, patent specifications (in both their linguistic and pictorial dimensions), and the highly specialized language of patent claims. More ambitiously, we could treat intellectual property as a technology itself. Patent law does not evolve either by merely articulating its doctrine in response to technological developments. The line between what does and does not count as invention may be redrawn with the emergence of new objects and technologies, but is not determined by them. It is this constructive feature of the law that we are trying to capture with the notion of law as technology. We hope that thinking about the technologies of the law and the law as technology will bring into question what we mean by both “technology” and “law”.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Pottage, Alain;
(October 2011)
Law machines: Scale models, forensic materiality and the making of modern patent law
(/isis/citation/CBB306887041/)
Article
Hyo Yoon Kang;
(2018)
Ghosts of Inventions: Patent Law’s Digital Mediations
(/isis/citation/CBB448268694/)
Article
Mario Biagioli;
(2018)
Weighing Intellectual Property: Can We Balance the Social Costs and Benefits of Patenting?
(/isis/citation/CBB212757503/)
Article
Jérôme Baudry;
(2018)
Examining Inventions, Shaping Property: The Savants and the French Patent System
(/isis/citation/CBB294489583/)
Book
Matsuura, Jeffrey H.;
(2008)
Jefferson vs. the Patent Trolls: A Populist Vision of Intellectual Property Rights
(/isis/citation/CBB000954251/)
Book
Con Díaz Gerardo;
(2019)
Software Rights: How Patent Law Transformed Software Development in America
(/isis/citation/CBB992270814/)
Article
Stathis Arapostathis;
(2018)
Marconi’s Legal Battles: Discursive, Textual, and Material Entanglements
(/isis/citation/CBB218081238/)
Article
Ratcliff, Jessica;
(2012)
Art to Cheat the Common-Weale: Inventors, Projectors, and Patentees in English Satire, ca. 1630--70
(/isis/citation/CBB001250063/)
Article
Brad Sherman;
(2018)
Intangible Machines: Patent Protection for Software in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB843796158/)
Article
Yi, Doogab;
(2011)
Who Owns What? Private Ownership and the Public Interest in Recombinant DNA Technology in the 1970s
(/isis/citation/CBB001220006/)
Chapter
Samuelson, Pamela;
(2011)
The Strange Odyssey of Software Interfaces as Intellectual Property
(/isis/citation/CBB001221563/)
Book
Jessica Silbey;
(2015)
The Eureka Myth: Creators, innovators, and everyday intellectual property
(/isis/citation/CBB476761641/)
Article
Mercelis, Joris;
(2012)
Leo Baekeland's Transatlantic Struggle for Bakelite: Patenting Inside and Outside of America
(/isis/citation/CBB001250064/)
Article
Khan, B. Zorina;
(2013)
Going for Gold: Industrial Fairs and Innovation in the Nineteenth-Century United States
(/isis/citation/CBB001320689/)
Article
Asuka Imaizumi;
(April 2022)
Widespread Enthusiasm: Grassroots Participation and Regional Variation in Early Japanese Patenting, 1885–99
(/isis/citation/CBB599282905/)
Article
Mario Biagioli;
Alain Pottage;
(2021)
Patenting Personalized Medicine: Molecules, Information, and the Body
(/isis/citation/CBB302669888/)
Article
Jose Bellido;
(2023)
Patents In Miniature: The Effects of Microfilm as an Information Technology, 1938–68
(/isis/citation/CBB263799726/)
Article
Beauchamp, Christopher;
(2010)
Who Invented the Telephone? Lawyers, Patents, and the Judgments of History
(/isis/citation/CBB001230632/)
Article
Biddle, Justin B.;
(2014)
Can Patents Prohibit Research? On the Social Epistemology of Patenting and Licensing in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001320767/)
Article
Katherine C. Epstein;
(2018)
Intellectual Property and National Security: The Case of the Hardcastle Superheater, 1905–1927
(/isis/citation/CBB436104785/)
Be the first to comment!