Contemporary risks are often understood as fundamentally uncertain. This uncertain status can be mobilized within political debates surrounding risks. Such a challenge serves to destabilize scientific claims. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) management of the 2009/10 spread of the H1N1 virus became a site of one such contestation. Debate within the Council of Europe particularly served to criticize the action of the WHO. This resulted in a definitional and policy contestation between the two institutions. The WHO accounted for its actions through allusions to (seemingly stable) scientific facts, using epidemiological evidence of influenza and its management based on normal science. In contrast, in criticizing public expenditure and panic, the Council of Europe critics problematized the stability of the science employed by the WHO. This included fundamental aspects of scientific knowledge such as the measurability of morbidity and mortality caused by H1N1 and the effect of vaccination against influenza viruses. This criticism relied upon the ability to destabilize the WHO’s scientific knowledge, a process made possible through understandings of the uncertain nature of the science of risk (post-normal science). The case study illustrates that potential for previous-established and seemingly stable scientific facts to become destabilized and problematized during contestations of risk management.
...More
Book
Jo Robertson;
(2022)
The International Campaign Against Leprosy: 1948 - 2005
(/isis/citation/CBB146380609/)
Article
Abeysinghe, Sudeepa;
(2014)
An Uncertain Risk: The World Health Organization's Account of H1N1
(/isis/citation/CBB001420418/)
Article
Mariacarla Gadebusch Bondio;
Maria Marloth;
(June 2020)
Die „historische Studie“ SOLIDARITY als Antwort der Forschung auf die Sars-CoV-2 Pandemie. (The "historical study" SOLIDARITY as a research response to the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic)
(/isis/citation/CBB693044222/)
Article
M. Cristina Amoretti;
Elisabetta Lalumera;
(2021)
Non-epistemic factors in epidemiological models. The case of mortality data
(/isis/citation/CBB546389082/)
Book
Marcos Cueto;
Theodore M. Brown;
Elizabeth Fee;
(2019)
The World Health Organization: A History
(/isis/citation/CBB707811990/)
Book
Koch, Tom;
(2011)
Disease Maps: Epidemics on the Ground
(/isis/citation/CBB001250403/)
Article
Nükhet Varlık;
(2020)
Rethinking the History of Plague in the Time of Covid-19
(/isis/citation/CBB776966901/)
Article
Andrew J. Hogan;
(2019)
Moving Away from the "Medical Model": The Development and Revision of the World Health Organization's Classification of Disability
(/isis/citation/CBB168943935/)
Book
Jacques Pépin;
(2021)
The Origins of AIDS
(/isis/citation/CBB084551418/)
Article
Choon Key Chekar;
Hyomin Kim;
(2022)
COVID-19 Exceptionalism: Explaining South Korean Responses
(/isis/citation/CBB527253772/)
Article
Silvia Caianiello;
(2020)
Accelerazione. Riflessioni sulle temporalità della pandemia
(/isis/citation/CBB072366901/)
Book
Fernando Rosa;
Alessandra Parodi;
(2024)
Essere in una pandemia. Filosofia, medicina e Covid-19
(/isis/citation/CBB335674855/)
Article
Martin Butler;
Sina Farzin;
Michael Fuchs;
(2021)
PandemIcons? The Medical Scientist as Iconic Figure in Times of Crisis
(/isis/citation/CBB262220114/)
Article
Luisa Simonutti;
(2020)
Paure, contaminazioni e alterità. Da Bacone a Kapuściński
(/isis/citation/CBB346421875/)
Article
Stefano Santasilia;
(2020)
Pandemia e stili di vita: pazienza
(/isis/citation/CBB845461986/)
Article
Luisa Simonutti;
(2020)
Uneasiness. John Locke e le inquietudini del presente
(/isis/citation/CBB647837757/)
Article
Brian Dolan;
(2020)
It Wasn't Supposed to Be a Coronavirus: The Quest for an Influenza A(h5n1)-Derived Vaccine and the Limits of Pandemic Preparedness
(/isis/citation/CBB603005256/)
Book
Carlo Caduff;
(2015)
The Pandemic Perhaps: Dramatic Events in a Public Culture of Danger
(/isis/citation/CBB736184954/)
Article
Susanne Bauer;
(2021)
Pandemic infrastructure: Epidemiology as compartmentalization
(/isis/citation/CBB933898213/)
Article
Howard Phillips;
(2020)
’17, ’18, ’19: religion and science in three pandemics, 1817, 1918, and 2019
(/isis/citation/CBB296469942/)
Be the first to comment!