Throughout the last quarter of the nineteenth century, researchers became increasingly interested in explaining the ways in which mammalian teeth, especially molars, and their complex arrangements of cusps arose along both developmental and evolutionary timescales. By the 1890s, two theories garnered special prominence; the tritubercular theory and the concrescence theory. The tritubercular theory was proposed by Edward Drinker Cope in 1883, and later expanded by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1888, while the concrescence theory was developed by Carl Röse in 1892. Reviews concerning the evolution of mammalian molar teeth tended to paint the two theories as occupying opposing sides, and debates arose between their main proponents; however, their tenets do not seem logically incompatible. Throughout this paper, I argue that the conflict that arose was due not to the content of the theories, but to a diverse array of commitments Cope, Osborn, and Röse held, which turned into background assumptions within the setting of these theories. This history traces the context in which Cope, Osborn, and Röse developed the tritubercular and concrescence theories, and the ways in which the assumptions that these investigators held influenced their perceptions of their theories.
...More
Thesis
Katherine MacCord;
(2017)
Development, Evolution, and Teeth: How We Came to Explain The Morphological Evolution of the Mammalian Dentition
Chapter
Gliboff, Sander;
(2011)
The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866--1926
Thesis
Brinkman, Paul David;
(2005)
The Second American Jurassic Dinosaur Rush, 1895--1905
Book
Johnson, Rebecca L.;
(2013)
Battle of the Dinosaur Bones: Othniel Charles Marsh vs. Edward Drinker Cope
Book
Gabriele Ferrari;
(2023)
Polvere e ossa. Edward Drinker Cope e Othniel Charles Marsh, due paleontologi a caccia di dinosauri nel Far West
Article
Ulett, Mark A.;
(2014)
Making the Case for Orthogenesis: The Popularization of Definitely Directed Evolution (1890--1926)
Article
David Ceccarelli;
(2021)
“The bad habit of wandering”: Morgan, Osborn and the issue of evolutionary causality in genetics and paleontology
Article
Homchick, Julie;
(2010)
Objects and Objectivity: The Evolution Controversy at the American Museum of Natural History, 1915--1928
Article
Logan, Alison M. B.;
Pickering, Jane;
(2014)
A Museum of Ideas: Evolution Education at the Yale Peabody Museum during the 1920s
Article
Alfonso Arroyo-Santos;
Mark E. Olson;
Francisco Vergara-Silva;
(2014)
Practice-Oriented Controversies and Borrowed Epistemic Credibility in Current Evolutionary Biology: Phylogeography as a Case Study
Article
Lindsay R. Craig;
(2014)
Neo-Darwinism and Evo-Devo: An Argument for Theoretical Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology
Article
Brian McLoone;
(2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins
Book
Tanya M. Smith;
(2018)
The Tales Teeth Tell: Development, Evolution, Behavior
Book
Catherine Carstairs;
(2022)
The Smile Gap: A History of Oral Health and Social Inequality
Article
Lee, Judith Yaross;
(1994)
Fossil feuds: Popular science and the rhetoric of vernacular humor
Article
P. D. Brinkman;
(2016)
Edward Drinker Cope's final feud
Book
Jane P. Davidson;
(2017)
Patrons of Paleontology: How Government Support Shaped a Science
Article
Bowler, Peter J.;
(1977)
Edward Drinker Cope and the changing structure of evolutionary theory
Article
Rainger, Ronald;
(1992)
The rise and decline of a science: Vertebrate paleontology at Philadelphia's Academy of Natural Sciences, 1820-1900
Article
Laurent, Goulven;
(1979)
Un néo-larmarckien américain, Edward Drinker Cope (1840-1897)
Be the first to comment!