Article ID: CBB966463876

Cartesian Anti-Astrology (2020)

unapi

Descartes and his early followers were widely seen to be enemies of superstition and the occult. This was particularly visible in the Cartesian movement’s antagonism to astrology. However, why Descartes and his early followers were so pitted against astrology is less than clear given the flexibility afforded to them through their system of philosophy and various mechanical explanations. Claude Gadroys (1642-1678), for example, produced a short treatise that provided a mechanical explanation consistent with Cartesian physics to allow for celestial influence on Earth. In doing so, he exposed a contradiction in Cartesian vortex theory that seemed to disallow any such influence. In this way, Gadroys brought against himself and then dispelled one of the strongest objections to a Cartesian astrology. Oddly, no other Cartesian relied on principles specific to Cartesianism to argue against astrology as a legitimate science. This paper’s goal is to give a survey of some of the most prominent anti-astrological influences on Descartes, as well as some of the most prominent anti-astrological Cartesians in the second half of the 17th century. In doing this, I hope to show two things. First, in mainstream Cartesianism of the period, the anti-astrological sentiment was in no way part of the debate surrounding Descartes’ philosophy. Instead, ‘Cartesian’ anti-astrological arguments were based on well-worn arguments with an emphasis on experimental difficulties in establishing an astrological science. Second, the explanation for the curious lack of distinctly Cartesian anti-astrological arguments reflects an inherent flaw in Cartesianism; namely, it lacked the theoretical tools to completely rule out ‘occult’ sciences such as astrology.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB966463876/

Similar Citations

Thesis Lo, Melissa Ming-Hwei; (2014)
Between Figure and Line: Visual Transformations of Cartesian Physics, 1620--1690 (/isis/citation/CBB001567556/)

Article Belkind, Ori; (2013)
Leibniz and Newton on Space (/isis/citation/CBB001320865/)

Book Schuster, John; (2013)
Descartes-Agonistes: Physico-Mathematics, Method and Corpuscular-Mechanism 1618--33 (/isis/citation/CBB001500367/)

Article Rodolfo Garau; (2020)
Gassendi's Critique of Astrology (/isis/citation/CBB174175518/)

Article Zemplén, Gábor Á.; Demeter, Tamás; (2010)
Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton's Experimentum Crucis (/isis/citation/CBB001221445/)

Chapter Roger Ariew; (2013)
Censorship, Condemnations, and the Spread of Cartesianism (/isis/citation/CBB116959533/)

Article Jane Ridder-Patrick; (2017)
The Marginalization of Astrology in Seventeenth-Century Scotland (/isis/citation/CBB237686426/)

Article Mihnea Dobre; (2020)
Jacques Rohault’s Mathematical Physics (/isis/citation/CBB922054924/)

Chapter Patricia Easton; (2013)
Robert Desgabets on the Physics and Metaphysics of Blood Transfusion (/isis/citation/CBB640584056/)

Chapter Kramnick, Jonathan; (2012)
Living with Lucretius (/isis/citation/CBB001200738/)

Chapter Mihnea Dobre; (2013)
Rohault’s Cartesian Physics (/isis/citation/CBB913683806/)

Book Schmaltz, Tad M.; (2002)
Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes (/isis/citation/CBB000302043/)

Authors & Contributors
Garau, Rodolfo
Dobre, Mihnea
Borghero, Carlo
Jane Ridder-Patrick
Schuster, John
Lo, Melissa Ming-Hwei
Concepts
Cartesianism
Natural philosophy
Philosophy of science
Controversies and disputes
Physics
Empiricism
Time Periods
17th century
18th century
Places
Basel (Switzerland)
Leiden (Netherlands)
England
Prussia (Germany)
Scotland
Netherlands
Institutions
University of Frankfurt (Oder)
Académie Royale des Sciences (France)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment