Seungmi Chung (Author)
Kun Hee Kim (Author)
Yeseul Park (Author)
Kim, Hyomin (Author)
This paper examines a historical case where local residents in South Korea had been alienated from the decision-making processes in nuclear policy as their sociotechnical visions remained marginalized. Narratives of nuclear experts, activists in environmental NGOs (ENGOs), and local residents supporting or resisting against the siting of a repository in a southwestern rural town, Buan, from 2003 to 2005 were used for our comparative textual analyses. Imaginaries of desirable forms of life and order that constitute nationally-shared visions of “good society” profoundly delimit the shapes of futures by enabling key political decisions of a nation. With our findings, we argue that ethical problems of how to recognize and compensate for what has already happened to people around (candidate) sites of nuclear facilities remains a source of latent social conflict. Buan residents’ visions of a “good society” attainable through their practices around nuclear technology were collectively held and publicly narrated yet failed to become widely shared in the nation. If local people’s understanding of what the past has been and what the future should be like continue to stay marginalized, Korean nuclear governance with participatory initiatives will remain in its current form of “partial” inclusiveness.
...More
Article
Melanie Smallman;
(August 2020)
‘Nothing to do with the science’: How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government
(/isis/citation/CBB153866236/)
Article
Clarissa Ai Ling Lee;
(2023)
Managing ‘Wicked’ Technoscientific Problems: The Postnormal Science of Risk Narratives
(/isis/citation/CBB747521102/)
Article
Sung Hwan Kim;
Hyomin Kim;
Sungsoo Song;
(September 2020)
Public Deliberation on South Korean Nuclear Power Plants: How Can Lay Knowledge Resist against Expertise?
(/isis/citation/CBB276383449/)
Article
Yevgeniya Tomkiv;
Astrid Liland;
Deborah H. Oughton;
Brian Wynne;
(2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB106267662/)
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
(/isis/citation/CBB181098680/)
Article
Rachel J. Wilde;
David Guile;
(2021)
Client-facing Interprofessional Project Teams: The Role of Engineers’ ‘Situated Judgment’
(/isis/citation/CBB589787344/)
Article
Chan-Yuan Wong;
Sangook Park;
(2021)
Diverged Evolutionary Pathways of Two Public Research Institutes in Taiwan and Korea: Shared Missions and Varied Organizational Dynamics in ITRI and KIST
(/isis/citation/CBB754093581/)
Article
Bak, Hee-Je;
(2014)
The Politics of Technoscience in Korea: From State Policy to Social Movement
(/isis/citation/CBB001450064/)
Article
Alexandra Coso Strong;
Tehya Stockman;
Tom Heale;
Steven Meyer;
Elena Meyerson;
(2022)
Persuasive Communication Practices of Engineers in Cross-Boundary Decision-Making
(/isis/citation/CBB458121138/)
Article
Dilshani Sarathchandra;
(2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience
(/isis/citation/CBB691241938/)
Book
Louise Amoore;
(2020)
Cloud ethics : Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others
(/isis/citation/CBB491357774/)
Article
Oliver Todt;
José Luis Luján;
(2022)
Rationality in Context: Regulatory Science and the Best Scientific Method
(/isis/citation/CBB425178130/)
Article
Britt Paris;
(September 2021)
The Internet of Futures Past: Values Trajectories of Networking Protocol Projects
(/isis/citation/CBB589331477/)
Article
John Gardner;
(September 2017)
Accelerating Innovation in the Creation of Biovalue: The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult
(/isis/citation/CBB000462445/)
Article
Manoj Vimal;
Wairokpam Premi Devi;
Ian McGonigle;
(2023)
Generational Medicine in Singapore: A National Biobank for a Greying Nation
(/isis/citation/CBB043411552/)
Article
Kasper Schiølin;
(August 2020)
Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark
(/isis/citation/CBB481449964/)
Article
Christopher Lawrence;
(August 2020)
Heralds of global transparency: Remote sensing, nuclear fuel-cycle facilities, and the modularity of imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB358352541/)
Article
Benjamin K Sovacool;
Noam Bergman;
Debbie Hopkins;
Kirsten EH Jenkins;
Sabine Hielscher;
Andreas Goldthau;
Brent Brossmann;
(August 2020)
Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: Valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future
(/isis/citation/CBB482828082/)
Article
Sheila Jasanoff;
Ian McGonigle;
Hallam Stevens;
(2021)
Science and Technology for Humanity: An STS View from Singapore
(/isis/citation/CBB712642449/)
Article
Sheila Jasanoff;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(December 2017)
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures
(/isis/citation/CBB640965055/)
Be the first to comment!