Seungmi Chung (Author)
Kun Hee Kim (Author)
Yeseul Park (Author)
Kim, Hyomin (Author)
This paper examines a historical case where local residents in South Korea had been alienated from the decision-making processes in nuclear policy as their sociotechnical visions remained marginalized. Narratives of nuclear experts, activists in environmental NGOs (ENGOs), and local residents supporting or resisting against the siting of a repository in a southwestern rural town, Buan, from 2003 to 2005 were used for our comparative textual analyses. Imaginaries of desirable forms of life and order that constitute nationally-shared visions of “good society” profoundly delimit the shapes of futures by enabling key political decisions of a nation. With our findings, we argue that ethical problems of how to recognize and compensate for what has already happened to people around (candidate) sites of nuclear facilities remains a source of latent social conflict. Buan residents’ visions of a “good society” attainable through their practices around nuclear technology were collectively held and publicly narrated yet failed to become widely shared in the nation. If local people’s understanding of what the past has been and what the future should be like continue to stay marginalized, Korean nuclear governance with participatory initiatives will remain in its current form of “partial” inclusiveness.
...More
Article
Melanie Smallman;
(August 2020)
‘Nothing to do with the science’: How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government
Article
Clarissa Ai Ling Lee;
(2023)
Managing ‘Wicked’ Technoscientific Problems: The Postnormal Science of Risk Narratives
Article
Sung Hwan Kim;
Hyomin Kim;
Sungsoo Song;
(September 2020)
Public Deliberation on South Korean Nuclear Power Plants: How Can Lay Knowledge Resist against Expertise?
Article
Yevgeniya Tomkiv;
Astrid Liland;
Deborah H. Oughton;
Brian Wynne;
(2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy
Article
Charles Anthony Bates;
Christian Clausen;
(2020)
Engineering Readiness: How the TRL Figure of Merit Coordinates Technology Development
Article
Dilshani Sarathchandra;
(2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience
Article
Alexandra Coso Strong;
Tehya Stockman;
Tom Heale;
Steven Meyer;
Elena Meyerson;
(2022)
Persuasive Communication Practices of Engineers in Cross-Boundary Decision-Making
Book
Louise Amoore;
(2020)
Cloud ethics : Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others
Article
Dow Schüll, Natusha;
Zaloom, Caitlin;
(August 2011)
The shortsighted brain: Neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time
Article
Rachel J. Wilde;
David Guile;
(2021)
Client-facing Interprofessional Project Teams: The Role of Engineers’ ‘Situated Judgment’
Article
Oliver Todt;
José Luis Luján;
(2022)
Rationality in Context: Regulatory Science and the Best Scientific Method
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
Article
Ruth Mampuys;
(2023)
The Deadlock in European Decision-Making on GMOs as a Wicked Problem by Design: A Need for Repoliticization
Article
Bak, Hee-Je;
(2014)
The Politics of Technoscience in Korea: From State Policy to Social Movement
Article
Chan-Yuan Wong;
Sangook Park;
(2021)
Diverged Evolutionary Pathways of Two Public Research Institutes in Taiwan and Korea: Shared Missions and Varied Organizational Dynamics in ITRI and KIST
Article
Choon Key Chekar;
Hyomin Kim;
(2022)
COVID-19 Exceptionalism: Explaining South Korean Responses
Article
Heewon Kim;
Hyungsub Choi;
(2022)
From Hwangsa to COVID-19: The Rise of Mass Masking in South Korea
Article
Duckhee Jang;
Doh Soogwan;
Gil-Mo Kang;
Dong-Seong Han;
(January 2017)
Impact of Alumni Connections on Peer Review Ratings and Selection Success Rate in National Research
Article
Yoori Hwang;
Se-Hoon Jeong;
(2020)
A Channel-Specific Analysis of the Risk Information Seeking and Processing (RISP) Model: The Role of Relevant Channel Beliefs and Perceived Information Gathering Capacity
Article
Jathan Sadowski;
Roy Bendor;
(2019)
Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary
Be the first to comment!