Article ID: CBB959012966

A Site of Bounded Imaginaries: Local Narratives of Buan after Protests against a Nuclear Waste Repository (2021)

unapi

This paper examines a historical case where local residents in South Korea had been alienated from the decision-making processes in nuclear policy as their sociotechnical visions remained marginalized. Narratives of nuclear experts, activists in environmental NGOs (ENGOs), and local residents supporting or resisting against the siting of a repository in a southwestern rural town, Buan, from 2003 to 2005 were used for our comparative textual analyses. Imaginaries of desirable forms of life and order that constitute nationally-shared visions of “good society” profoundly delimit the shapes of futures by enabling key political decisions of a nation. With our findings, we argue that ethical problems of how to recognize and compensate for what has already happened to people around (candidate) sites of nuclear facilities remains a source of latent social conflict. Buan residents’ visions of a “good society” attainable through their practices around nuclear technology were collectively held and publicly narrated yet failed to become widely shared in the nation. If local people’s understanding of what the past has been and what the future should be like continue to stay marginalized, Korean nuclear governance with participatory initiatives will remain in its current form of “partial” inclusiveness.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB959012966/

Similar Citations

Article Clarissa Ai Ling Lee; (2023)
Managing ‘Wicked’ Technoscientific Problems: The Postnormal Science of Risk Narratives (/isis/citation/CBB747521102/)

Article Sung Hwan Kim; Hyomin Kim; Sungsoo Song; (September 2020)
Public Deliberation on South Korean Nuclear Power Plants: How Can Lay Knowledge Resist against Expertise? (/isis/citation/CBB276383449/)

Article Yevgeniya Tomkiv; Astrid Liland; Deborah H. Oughton; Brian Wynne; (2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy (/isis/citation/CBB106267662/)

Article Rachel J. Wilde; David Guile; (2021)
Client-facing Interprofessional Project Teams: The Role of Engineers’ ‘Situated Judgment’ (/isis/citation/CBB589787344/)

Article Alexandra Coso Strong; Tehya Stockman; Tom Heale; Steven Meyer; Elena Meyerson; (2022)
Persuasive Communication Practices of Engineers in Cross-Boundary Decision-Making (/isis/citation/CBB458121138/)

Article Dilshani Sarathchandra; (2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience (/isis/citation/CBB691241938/)

Book Louise Amoore; (2020)
Cloud ethics : Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others (/isis/citation/CBB491357774/)

Article Bak, Hee-Je; (2014)
The Politics of Technoscience in Korea: From State Policy to Social Movement (/isis/citation/CBB001450064/)

Article Britt Paris; (September 2021)
The Internet of Futures Past: Values Trajectories of Networking Protocol Projects (/isis/citation/CBB589331477/)

Article Oliver Todt; José Luis Luján; (2022)
Rationality in Context: Regulatory Science and the Best Scientific Method (/isis/citation/CBB425178130/)

Article John Gardner; (September 2017)
Accelerating Innovation in the Creation of Biovalue: The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult (/isis/citation/CBB000462445/)

Article Manoj Vimal; Wairokpam Premi Devi; Ian McGonigle; (2023)
Generational Medicine in Singapore: A National Biobank for a Greying Nation (/isis/citation/CBB043411552/)

Article Benjamin K Sovacool; Noam Bergman; Debbie Hopkins; Kirsten EH Jenkins; Sabine Hielscher; Andreas Goldthau; Brent Brossmann; (August 2020)
Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: Valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future (/isis/citation/CBB482828082/)

Article Sheila Jasanoff; Ian McGonigle; Hallam Stevens; (2021)
Science and Technology for Humanity: An STS View from Singapore (/isis/citation/CBB712642449/)

Article Sheila Jasanoff; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (December 2017)
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures (/isis/citation/CBB640965055/)

Authors & Contributors
McGonigle, Ian
Jasanoff, Sheila
Noam Bergman
Tehya Stockman
Roumbanis, Lambros
Debbie Hopkins
Journals
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Social Studies of Science
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Engineering Studies
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Publishers
Duke University Press
Concepts
Science and technology studies (STS)
Imaginaries
Decision making
Expertise
Citizen participation
Technology and society
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Places
Great Britain
South Korea
Singapore
East Asia
United States
Malay; Malaysia
Institutions
Industrial Technology Research Institute- ITRI
NTU Institute of Science and Technology for Humanity
Korea Institute of Science and Technology - KIST
National Science Foundation (U.S.)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment