Kaalund, Nanna Katrine Lüders (Author)
How do glaciers move? This seemingly straightforward question provided the backdrop for a heated debate between the physicists John Tyndall (1820–1893) and James David Forbes (1809–1868) in the late 1850s and early 1860s. Forbes described the motion of glaciers as that of a viscous fluid. After visiting the Alps, Tyndall proposed an alternative theory that combined fracture and regelation. The glacial controversy ensued. Yet the debate was never simply about whether glaciers moved like honey, or if they moved by continuously breaking and re-attaching. This paper shows that the glacial controversy formed an important prelude to the strategies used by the X-Club in reforming science and establishing cultural authority. There was a central difference in the way Forbes and Tyndall presented their scientific arguments. Tyndall and his allies used the changes in the periodical press as part of their strategy for establishing and maintaining cultural and scientific authority. By contrast, Forbes and his supporters, including the North British physicists, were not as quick to make use of this new medium. This paper, therefore, examines in detail the significance of these two publishing strategies in shaping the nature and results of the glacial controversy.
...More
Book
Ruth Barton;
(2018)
The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science
Book
Michael D. Barton;
Joseph D. Martin;
Gregory Radick;
Roy MacLeod;
(2024)
The Correspondence of John Tyndall, Volume 13: The Correspondence, June 1872–September 1873
Article
Geir Hestmark;
(2017)
Tracings of the north of Europe: Robert Chambers in search of the Ice Age
Book
Lightman, Bernard;
Reidy, Michael S.;
(2014)
The Age of Scientific Naturalism: Tyndall and His Contemporaries
Article
David Fedman;
Martin Hood;
(2019)
Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan
Article
Hevly, Bruce;
(1996)
The heroic science of glacier motion
Book
Michael D. Barton;
Janet Browne;
Ken Corbett;
Norman McMillan;
(2019)
The Correspondence of John Tyndall, Volume 6: The Correspondence, November 1856-February 1859
Book
Fletcher, Ronald;
(1991)
Science, Ideology, and the Media: The Cyril Burt Scandal
Book
Biagioli, Mario;
Galison, Peter Louis;
(2003)
Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science
Article
John Hollier;
Anita Hollier;
(2016)
The Glacier Theory of Louis Rendu (1789–1859) and the Forbes–Tyndall Controversy
Article
Jordan D. II Marché;
(2018)
Edward Hitchcock, Roderick Murchison, and rejection of the alpine glacial theory (1840-1845)
Chapter
Rankin, Jeremiah;
Barton, Ruth;
(2014)
Tyndall, Lewes and Popular Representations of Scientific Authority in Victorian Britain
Article
DeArce, Miguel;
(2012)
The Natural History Review (1854--1865)
Book
William H. Brock;
Geoffrey Cantor;
(2018)
The Correspondence of John Tyndall, Volume 5: The Correspondence, January 1855-October 1856
Chapter
Baldwin, Melinda;
(2014)
Tyndall and Stokes: Correspondence, Referee Reports and the Physical Sciences in Victorian Britain
Article
Roland Jackson;
(2020)
Eunice Foote, John Tyndall and a question of priority
Chapter
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2014)
The Fate of Scientific Naturalism: From Public Sphere to Professional Exclusivity
Article
Matthew Wale;
(2019)
Editing Entomology: Natural-history Periodicals and the Shaping of Scientific Communities in Nineteenth-century Britain
Article
Jackson, Myles W.;
(2003)
Harmonious Investigators of Nature: Music and the Persona of the German Naturforscher in the Nineteenth Century
Article
Miguel de Asúa;
(2023)
Redhead, Paroissien, Parish & Co.: British Field Science in early Independent RÍo de la Plata
Be the first to comment!