Article ID: CBB925918030

An unappreciated merit of counterfactual histories of science (2020)

unapi

This paper critically engages with Ian Hesketh's (2016) analysis of counterfactual histories of science. According to such analysis, extant counterfactual histories—especially of biology—have a rather conservative flavor, since due to the authors' concern for plausibility, they typically converge on actual science, in the sense that their endpoints coincide with (or are very similar to) those of the corresponding actual scientific developments. As a result, Hesketh argues, not only does the ambition—often proclaimed—to exhibit the centrality of contingency in history of science remain unfulfilled: counterfactual narratives in the history of biology also end up with valuing the past in view of its contribution to the establishment of present-day science. Contrary to this analysis, we contend that an unappreciated merit of counterfactual histories of science converging on actual science lies in the fact that they put present science in a different light, since by being approached from a counterfactual angle, differing from established history, present-day science appears in a new perspective.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB925918030/

Similar Citations

Article Joachim L. Dagg; (2019)
Motives and merits of counterfactual histories of science (/isis/citation/CBB710171767/)

Article Joachim L. Dagg; (2017)
How counterfactuals of Red-Queen theory shed light on science and its historiography (/isis/citation/CBB638039701/)

Article Thierry Hoquet; (2021)
Pluralizing Darwin: Making Counter-Factual History of Science Significant (/isis/citation/CBB581465929/)

Article Gregory Radick; (2016)
Presidential Address: Experimenting with the Scientific Past† (/isis/citation/CBB748863438/)

Article Catherine Greene; (2021)
Historical Counterfactuals, Transition Periods, and the Constraints on Imagination (/isis/citation/CBB731857942/)

Article Duan, Lian; (2011)
Museums of Natural Science and Technology and Oral History (/isis/citation/CBB001221318/)

Article Marlon C. Alcantara; Marco Braga; Charles van den Heuvel; (2020)
Historical Networks in Science Education (/isis/citation/CBB597315285/)

Article David Rabouin; Anne-Lise Rey; (2022)
La science classique dans la Revue d’histoire des sciences (/isis/citation/CBB509066510/)

Article Robert Bud; (2016)
Representing scale: What should be special about the heritage of mass science? (/isis/citation/CBB100969947/)

Article Jeffrey I. Seeman; (2022)
Remote Interviewing and the History of Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB903379745/)

Article Alan J. Rocke; (2022)
Reflections on the Last and the Next Hundred Years (/isis/citation/CBB294366367/)

Article Feest, Uljana; Sturm, Thomas; (2011)
What (Good) Is Historical Epistemology? (/isis/citation/CBB001024687/)

Article Carla Nappi; (2017)
Paying Attention: Early Modern Science Beyond Genealogy (/isis/citation/CBB373564709/)

Article Hallvard J. Fossheim; (2019)
Past responsibility: History and the ethics of research on ethnic groups (/isis/citation/CBB562849198/)

Authors & Contributors
Dagg, Joachim
Greene, Catherine
Tambolo, Luca
Marlon C. Alcantara
Sturm, Thomas
Seeman, Jeffrey I.
Concepts
Historical method
History of science, as a discipline
Counterfactual history
Historiography
Contingency (philosophy)
Biology
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Early modern
20th century, early
20th century
19th century
Places
Spain
China
Institutions
History of Science Society
American Chemical Society
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment