Tambolo, Luca (Author)
This paper critically engages with Ian Hesketh's (2016) analysis of counterfactual histories of science. According to such analysis, extant counterfactual histories—especially of biology—have a rather conservative flavor, since due to the authors' concern for plausibility, they typically converge on actual science, in the sense that their endpoints coincide with (or are very similar to) those of the corresponding actual scientific developments. As a result, Hesketh argues, not only does the ambition—often proclaimed—to exhibit the centrality of contingency in history of science remain unfulfilled: counterfactual narratives in the history of biology also end up with valuing the past in view of its contribution to the establishment of present-day science. Contrary to this analysis, we contend that an unappreciated merit of counterfactual histories of science converging on actual science lies in the fact that they put present science in a different light, since by being approached from a counterfactual angle, differing from established history, present-day science appears in a new perspective.
...More
Article
Joachim L. Dagg;
(2019)
Motives and merits of counterfactual histories of science
(/isis/citation/CBB710171767/)
Article
Luca Tambolo;
(2020)
So close no matter how far: counterfactuals in history of science and the inevitability/contingency controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB732121930/)
Article
Ian Hesketh;
(2016)
Counterfactuals and history: Contingency and convergence in histories of science and life
(/isis/citation/CBB385183310/)
Article
Joachim L. Dagg;
(2017)
How counterfactuals of Red-Queen theory shed light on science and its historiography
(/isis/citation/CBB638039701/)
Article
Thierry Hoquet;
(2021)
Pluralizing Darwin: Making Counter-Factual History of Science Significant
(/isis/citation/CBB581465929/)
Article
Gregory Radick;
(2016)
Presidential Address: Experimenting with the Scientific Past†
(/isis/citation/CBB748863438/)
Article
Catherine Greene;
(2021)
Historical Counterfactuals, Transition Periods, and the Constraints on Imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB731857942/)
Article
Duan, Lian;
(2011)
Museums of Natural Science and Technology and Oral History
(/isis/citation/CBB001221318/)
Article
Marlon C. Alcantara;
Marco Braga;
Charles van den Heuvel;
(2020)
Historical Networks in Science Education
(/isis/citation/CBB597315285/)
Article
Suzanne Marchand;
(2019)
How Much Knowledge is Worth Knowing? An American Intellectual Historian's Thoughts on the Geschichte des Wissens
(/isis/citation/CBB098275534/)
Article
Molero-Mesa, Jorge;
Jiménez-Lucena, Isabel;
(2013)
(Des)legitimando jerarquías sociales, profesionales y cognitivas. Conocimiento y prácticas científicas en los procesos de inclusión-exclusión
(/isis/citation/CBB001320242/)
Article
Simon Schaffer;
(2022)
Orientations and Disorientations in the History of Science How Measures Made a Difference at the Imperial Meridian
(/isis/citation/CBB969514447/)
Article
David Rabouin;
Anne-Lise Rey;
(2022)
La science classique dans la Revue d’histoire des sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB509066510/)
Article
Robert Bud;
(2016)
Representing scale: What should be special about the heritage of mass science?
(/isis/citation/CBB100969947/)
Article
François Duchesneau;
(2022)
Styles et modèles d’histoire des sciences biologiques: Revue d’histoire des sciences (1947-2022)
(/isis/citation/CBB253984231/)
Article
Jeffrey I. Seeman;
(2022)
Remote Interviewing and the History of Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB903379745/)
Article
Alan J. Rocke;
(2022)
Reflections on the Last and the Next Hundred Years
(/isis/citation/CBB294366367/)
Article
Feest, Uljana;
Sturm, Thomas;
(2011)
What (Good) Is Historical Epistemology?
(/isis/citation/CBB001024687/)
Article
Carla Nappi;
(2017)
Paying Attention: Early Modern Science Beyond Genealogy
(/isis/citation/CBB373564709/)
Article
Hallvard J. Fossheim;
(2019)
Past responsibility: History and the ethics of research on ethnic groups
(/isis/citation/CBB562849198/)
Be the first to comment!