Recently, different expert actors have attempted to localize Detroit’s food system to bring about greater justice citywide. At first, ‘professional experts’ dominated these efforts, claiming authority in the food system due to their knowledge based in qualified training and applied work experience. Yet a rival group of ‘experiential experts’ soon rose up to assert their power, arguing they and their unique race and place-based know-how merited greater influence. Within just a few years, experiential experts successfully replaced professional ones in commanding much area food localization. I show that experiential experts achieved this power largely through strategic boundary-work, including expulsion, expansion, and protection of autonomy. Nonetheless, some Detroiters and professional experts themselves questioned experiential experts’ legitimacy in removing professional experts from the food system altogether. I thus introduce a fourth form of boundary-work that experiential experts deployed to maintain their clout, what I term ‘accommodation’. Accommodation connotes instances of strategic inclusion where an expert authority facilitates rivals in sharing some influence based on distinct conditions that leave dominant epistemic arrangements generally intact. This occurred in Detroit as experiential experts accommodated professional ones in exercising some food systems power provided they better deploy their own race and place-based knowledge. Such actions helped quell public concern while also protecting experiential experts’ rising authority. Accommodation is useful for understanding cases in which diverse types of experts work together despite that single knowledge-forms guide their activities overall. Further research into accommodation could aid in identifying whether or not diverse forms of knowledge are together influencing decision-making around a range of cases, or if single forms of expertise remain dominant despite the appearance that democratization is taking place.
...MoreArticle Logan D. A. Williams; Sharlissa Moore (2019) Guest Editorial: Conceptualizing Justice and Counter-Expertise. Science as Culture (pp. 251-276).
Article Gloria Baigorrotegui (2019) Making Justice for Counter-Expertise and Doing Counter-Expertise for Justice. Science as Culture (pp. 375-382).
Article Kelly Moore; Nathalia Hernández Vidal; Daniel Lee Kleinman (2019) Knowledge and Justice: A Comment. Science as Culture (pp. 383-390).
Article Oluwatoyin Dare Kolawole (2019) Science, Social Scientisation and Hybridisation of Knowledges. Science as Culture (pp. 391-401).
Article
Elina I. Mäkinen;
(March 2018)
Action in the Space Between: From Latent to Active Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB718195671/)
Article
Gökçe Günel;
(2018)
The Backbone: Construction of a Regional Electricity Grid in the Arabian Peninsula
(/isis/citation/CBB043986489/)
Article
Guus Dix;
(April 2019)
Microeconomic forecasting: Constructing commensurable futures of educational reforms
(/isis/citation/CBB842460109/)
Article
Philip R. Egert;
Barbara L. Allen;
(2019)
Knowledge Justice: An Opportunity for Counter-expertise in Security vs. Science Debates
(/isis/citation/CBB135681924/)
Book
Jim Thatcher;
Andrew Shears;
Josef Eckert;
(2018)
Thinking Big Data in Geography: New Regimes, New Research
(/isis/citation/CBB720972061/)
Article
Sheldon Krimsky;
(November 2015)
An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB119149138/)
Book
Nestle, Marion;
(2008)
Pet Food Politics: The Chihuahua in the Coal Mine
(/isis/citation/CBB000850381/)
Book
Laura J. Miller;
(2017)
Building Nature's Market: The Business and Politics of Natural Foods
(/isis/citation/CBB811397129/)
Article
Suryanarayanan, Sainath;
Daniel Lee Kleinman. Daniel Lee;
(April 2013)
Be(e)coming experts: The controversy over insecticides in the honey bee colony collapse disorder
(/isis/citation/CBB096871778/)
Article
Peat Leith;
Frank Vanclay;
(November 2015)
Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities
(/isis/citation/CBB370881735/)
Book
Gil Eyal;
(2019)
The Crisis of Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB193528078/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
(September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry
(/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
(/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)
Article
Colleen Lanier-Christensen;
(September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making
(/isis/citation/CBB606231580/)
Article
Frédéric Bouchard;
(2016)
The Roles of Institutional Trust and Distrust in Grounding Rational Deference to Scientific Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB417241096/)
Article
Gloria Baigorrotegui;
(2019)
Making Justice for Counter-Expertise and Doing Counter-Expertise for Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB524523199/)
Article
Kenton Kroker;
(2022)
Insomnia, Medicalization, and Expert Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB106469327/)
Article
Federico Brandmayr;
(2021)
When Boundary Organisations Fail: Identifying Scientists and Civil Servants in L’Aquila Earthquake Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB058662495/)
Article
Logan D. A. Williams;
Sharlissa Moore;
(2019)
Guest Editorial: Conceptualizing Justice and Counter-Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB521476031/)
Be the first to comment!