Article ID: CBB905453313

Feyerabend’s well-ordered science: how an anarchist distributes funds (2021)

unapi

To anyone vaguely aware of Feyerabend, the title of this paper would appear as an oxymoron. For Feyerabend, it is often thought, science is an anarchic practice with no discernible structure. Against this trend, I elaborate the groundwork that Feyerabend has provided for the beginnings of an approach to organizing scientific research. Specifically, I argue that Feyerabend’s pluralism, once suitably modified, provides a plausible account of how to organize science. These modifications come from C.S. Peirce’s account of the economics of theory pursuit, which has since been corroborated by empirical findings in the social sciences. I go on to contrast this approach with the conception of a ‘well-ordered science’ as outlined by Kitcher (Science, truth, and democracy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001), Cartwright (Philos Sci 73(5):981–990, 2006), which rests on the assumption that we can predict the content of future research. I show how Feyerabend has already given us reasons to think that this model is much more limited than it is usually understood. I conclude by showing how models of resource allocation, specifically those of Kitcher (J Philos 87:5–22, 1990), Strevens (J Philos 100(2):55–79, 2003) and Weisberg and Muldoon (Philos Sci 76(2):225–252, 2009), unwittingly make use of this problematic assumption. I conclude by outlining a proposed model of resource allocation where funding is determined by lottery and briefly examining the extent to which it is compatible with the position defended in this paper.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB905453313/

Similar Citations

Article Gonzalo Munévar; (2016)
Historical Antecedents to the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend (/isis/citation/CBB421620184/)

Article Tsou, Jonathan Y.; (2003)
Reconsidering Feyerabend's “Anarchism” (/isis/citation/CBB000502674/)

Article Simon Lohse; Karim Bschir; (2020)
The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case for Epistemic Pluralism in Public Health Policy (/isis/citation/CBB948919196/)

Article Martin Kusch; (2016)
Relativism in Feyerabend's Later Writings (/isis/citation/CBB418480926/)

Article Chantelle Marlor; (2020)
Explaining knowledge pluralisms; the intertwining of culture and materiality (/isis/citation/CBB344558063/)

Article Sahotra Sarkar; (2015)
Nagel on Reduction (/isis/citation/CBB557469066/)

Book Bokulich, Alisa; (2008)
Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism (/isis/citation/CBB001032943/)

Article Daniel Kuby; (2016)
Feyerabend's ‘the Concept of Intelligibility in Modern Physics’ (1948) (/isis/citation/CBB342276445/)

Article Ian James Kidd; (2016)
Feyerabend on Politics, Education, and Scientific Culture (/isis/citation/CBB979490069/)

Article Michael T. Stuart; (2021)
Telling Stories in Science: Feyerabend and Thought Experiments (/isis/citation/CBB014785805/)

Essay Review Oberheim, Eric; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul; (2000)
Feyerabend's early philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB000110333/)

Book Farrell, Robert P.; (2003)
Feyerabend and Scientific Values: Tightrope-Walking Rationality (/isis/citation/CBB000470953/)

Article John Preston; (2016)
The Rise of Western Rationalism: Paul Feyerabend's Story (/isis/citation/CBB966383679/)

Article Matthew J. Brown; (2016)
The Abundant World: Paul Feyerabend's Metaphysics of Science (/isis/citation/CBB255917734/)

Chapter Stadler, Friedrich; (2008)
Paul Feyerabend and the Forgotten “Third Vienna Circle” (/isis/citation/CBB001023494/)

Authors & Contributors
Oberheim, Eric
Shaw, Jamie
Marlor, Chantelle
Daniel Kuby
Heller, Lisa
Kidd, Ian James
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Synthese
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Perspectives on Science
HOPOS
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Publishers
Kluwer
Cambridge University Press
Concepts
Philosophy of science
Pluralism (philosophy)
Physics
Methodology of science; scientific method
Relativism (philosophy)
Science and society
People
Feyerabend, Paul K.
Popper, Karl Raimund
Plato
Nagel, Ernest
Mill, John Stuart
Machiavelli, Niccolò
Time Periods
20th century
21st century
19th century
Places
Brazil
Vienna (Austria)
Institutions
Vienna Circle
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment