The vast majority of well-informed philosophers of science and scientists who are clearly (uncontroversially) scientists are able to extensionally differentiate between almost all scientific and non-scientific practices, disciplines, theories, attitudes, modes of procedure, etc., and do so or would do so in much the same way. This legitimately leads to the conclusion that the main problem of scientific demarcation has already, in a sense, been solved, although an explicative integrated account of that solution has not yet been given. Doing so is the goal of the project proposed in Fernandez-Beanato (Journal for General Philosophy of Science 51(3):375–391, 2020b). To advance toward the solution of the scientific demarcation problem, this article executes part of that project: a first step for scientific demarcation is the composition of a broad “list” (set) of accepted characteristics, conditions, or properties of science, or indicators of scientificity (most of them, by themselves, unnecessary and insufficient) which might be collectively used to establish a demarcation between those theories, cognitive fields, practices, etc. which are scientific and those which are not. This article deals with feng shui as a clear case of a non-science. It defines feng shui and then lists properties of science that feng shui possesses and properties of science that it lacks. This article then shows that the proposed demarcatory list demarcates feng shui as non-scientific, in agreement with the current philosophical and scientific consensus.
...MoreArticle Michael R. Matthews (2021) Feng Shui in Science Programmes. Science and Education (pp. 1319-1332).
Similar Citations
Article
Íñigo Ongay de Felipe;
(2021)
The Universality of Science and Traditional Chinese Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB491161982/)
Article
Michael John Paton;
(2021)
Science and Fengshui
(/isis/citation/CBB166915252/)
Article
Meifang Zhang;
Bing Liu;
(2021)
The Theoretical Foundations of Feng Shui and Science Education in China
(/isis/citation/CBB282177476/)
Book
Michael R. Matthews;
(2020)
Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience
(/isis/citation/CBB856495335/)
Book
Massimo Pigliucci;
Maarten Boudry;
(2013)
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
(/isis/citation/CBB137053452/)
Article
Segala, Marco;
(2013)
Jean-Baptiste Biot collaborateur du Mercure de France: Vulgarisation et analyse philosophique des sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001213935/)
Article
Michael R. Matthews;
(2021)
Feng Shui in Science Programmes
(/isis/citation/CBB185813060/)
Book
Michael D. Gordin;
(2021)
On the Fringe: Where Science Meets Pseudoscience
(/isis/citation/CBB210470544/)
Article
Wendy E. Wagner;
(2022)
No one solution to the “new demarcation problem”?: A view from the trenches
(/isis/citation/CBB535781577/)
Article
Alexander Reutlinger;
(2022)
When do non-epistemic values play an epistemically illegitimate role in science? How to solve one half of the new demarcation problem
(/isis/citation/CBB412269629/)
Article
Bennett Holman;
Torsten Wilholt;
(2022)
The new demarcation problem
(/isis/citation/CBB597134997/)
Article
Hong-key Yoon;
(2015)
Four Points to Be Considered when Writing “A History of Science and Civilisation in Korea”
(/isis/citation/CBB813452874/)
Article
Li, Zhen;
(2006)
Study on the Stone-working Skills of Traditional Chinese Architecture During and Before the Northern and Southern Dynasties
(/isis/citation/CBB001020790/)
Article
Simonetta Milani;
Massimo Muccioli;
(2021)
Teoria del respiro tra medicina e spiritualità nella tradizione della medicina cinese
(/isis/citation/CBB233444751/)
Book
Uskali Mäki;
Adrian Walsh;
Manuela Fernández Pinto;
(2017)
Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity
(/isis/citation/CBB500067532/)
Article
Bowen, Alan C.;
(2007)
The Demarcation of Physical Theory and Astronomy by Geminus and Ptolemy
(/isis/citation/CBB000830785/)
Article
Staley, Thomas W.;
(2009)
Keeping Philosophy in Mind: Shadworth H. Hodgson's Articulation of the Boundaries of Philosophy and Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001030596/)
Article
Zachary Piso;
Viorel Pâslaru;
(2021)
Introduction to values and pluralism in the environmental sciences: From inferences to institutions
(/isis/citation/CBB702377462/)
Article
Gil-Riano, Sebastian;
Hamilton, Vivien;
(2009)
Editor's Introduction: Epistemic Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB001023764/)
Thesis
Katja Jylkka;
(2019)
Speculating Science: Nature, Narrative, and the Cryptozoological Imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB523897426/)
Be the first to comment!