IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB886006696

Kickstarting science? Crowdfunded research, public engagement, and the participatory condition (2023)

Chris Hesselbein (Author)

Science as Culture
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 583-608

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2222741

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2023.2222741

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Crowdfunding for science has been hailed both as an important means of funding early-career scholars and innovative research projects, and as a novel approach to communicating with and enabling participation by members of the public. The experiences of scientists who have sought crowdfunding and the opportunities and challenges that this entails are analyzed to critically examine claims (by platforms and in previous studies) about the democratizing potential of crowdfunding for ‘opening up’ research funding and ‘engaging’ members of the public in scientific research. Interview accounts of scientists indicate that crowdfunding can provide crucial support for under-resourced researchers as well as research projects, and that it offers a relatively unique opportunity for communicating science and enabling public participation in several aspects of the scientific research process. However, these accounts also reveal that seeking crowdfunding gives rise to several practical, social, and professional issues, such as increasing the burden of labour on already disadvantaged researchers, straining relationships with colleagues, tarnishing one’s professional status, and ultimately exacerbating inequalities among scientists. Moreover, the ostensible promise of crowdfunding for enhancing science communication and public engagement in science is undercut by the failure of both crowdfunding platforms and campaigners to take the potential non-monetary contributions or expertise of non-scientists seriously. Rather than acknowledging the potential for two-way dialogue and public participation that crowdfunding platforms can potentially provide, public input is formatted as a financial transaction, which reduces the ability of publics to influence crowdfunded projects in a meaningful manner and therefore greatly diminishes their democratic potential.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB886006696/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Kärnfelta, Johan; (2014)
Knut Lundmark, Meteors and an Early Swedish Crowdsourcing Experiment (/isis/citation/CBB001451565/)

Article Jérôme Baudry; Élise Tancoigne; Bruno J Strasser; (June 2022)
Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science (/isis/citation/CBB205266249/)

Article Courtney Addison; Hallam Stevens; (May 2022)
Crowdfunding Conservation Science: Tracing the Participatory Dynamics of Native Parrot Genome Sequencing (/isis/citation/CBB774118711/)

Article Sarah Blacker; Aya H Kimura; Abby Kinchy; (October 2021)
When citizen science is public relations (/isis/citation/CBB240395704/)

Article Petra Benyei; Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana; Laura Aceituno-Mata; Laura Calvet-Mir; María Carrascosa-García; Marta Rivera-Ferre; Antonio Perdomo-Molina; Victoria Reyes-García; (July 2021)
Participation in Citizen Science: Insights from the CONECT-e Case Study (/isis/citation/CBB840403823/)

Article Aleta Quinn; (2021)
Transparency and secrecy in citizen science: Lessons from herping (/isis/citation/CBB510363901/)

Article Jones, Mark Peter; (2009)
Entrepreneurial Science: The Rules of the Game (/isis/citation/CBB000953584/)

Thesis Perorazio, Thomas E.; (2009)
Curiosity and Commercialization: Faculty Perspectives on Sponsored Research, Academic Science and Research Agendas (/isis/citation/CBB001561104/)

Article Tizian Zumthurm; Stefan Krebs; (April 2022)
Collecting Middle-Class Memories? The Pandemic, Technology, and Crowdsourced Archives (/isis/citation/CBB538485588/)

Article Sara Spike; (2020)
Mayflowers and Sleeping Johnnies: Nature-Study, Local Knowledge, and A. H. MacKay’s Phenological Research in Rural Nova Scotia, 1892-1925 (/isis/citation/CBB173073577/)

Article Stephen C. Rea; Hanzelle Kleeman; Qin Zhu; Benjamin Gilbert; Chuan Yue; (2020)
Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Methodological, Fair, and Political Considerations (/isis/citation/CBB450321760/)

Article Chen, Shun-Ling; (June 2019)
How Empowering Is Citizen Science? Access, Credits, and Governance for the Crowd (/isis/citation/CBB511536886/)

Article Annemarie de Wildt; Errol Boom; (2022)
Creating an Online Community: Corona in the City (/isis/citation/CBB634681663/)

Article Tomasz Panecki; (2014)
Creating a Common Symbol Classification for a New Historical Geoportal of Poland (/isis/citation/CBB791750669/)

Article Alex Nading; (2016)
Evidentiary Symbiosis: On Paraethnography in Human–Microbe Relations (/isis/citation/CBB414849345/)

Article Jayson A. Altieri; (2020)
Government Girls: Crowd-Sourcing Aircraft in World War II (/isis/citation/CBB866500079/)

Article Littmann, Mark; Suomela, Todd; (2014)
Crowdsourcing, the Great Meteor Storm of 1833, and the Founding of Meteor Science (/isis/citation/CBB001451197/)

Article Anna Froese; Natalie Mevissen; (2020)
Failure through Success: Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development (/isis/citation/CBB887621152/)

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)

Article Zora Kovacic; (November 2018)
Conceptualizing Numbers at the Science–Policy Interface (/isis/citation/CBB992633742/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}