Raizman-Kedar, Yael (Author)
Annals of Science: The History of Science and Technology
Volume: 73
Issue: 1
Pages: 68-88
The paper examines the relevance of the nomological view of nature to three discussions of tide in the thirteenth century. A nomological conception of nature assumes that the basic explanatory units of natural phenomena are universally binding rules stated in quantitative terms. (1) Robert Grosseteste introduced an account of the tide based on the mechanism of rarefaction and condensation, stimulated by the Moon's rays and their angle of incidence. He considered the Moon's action over the sea an example of the general efficient causality exerted through the universal activity of light or species. (2) Albert the Great posited a plurality of causes which cannot be reduced to a single cause. The connaturality of the Moon and the water is the only principle of explanation which he considered universal. Connaturality, however, renders neither formulation nor quantification possible. While Albert stressed the variety of causes of the tide, (3) Roger Bacon emphasized regularity and reduced the various causes producing tides into forces. He replaced the terminology of ‘natures’ by one of ‘forces’. Force, which in principle can be accurately described and measured, thus becomes a commensurable aspect of a diverse cosmos. When they reasoned why waters return to their place after the tide, Grosseteste argued that waters return in order to prevent a vacuum, Albert claimed that waters ‘follow their own nature’, while Bacon held that the ‘proper force’ of the water prevails over the distant force of the first heaven. I exhibit, for the thirteenth century, moments of the move away from the Aristotelian concerns. The basic elements of these concerns were essences and natures which reflect specific phenomena and did not allow for an image of nature as a unified system. In the new perspective of the thirteenth century the key was a causal link between the position of the Moon and the tide cycle, a link which is universal and still qualitative, yet expressed as susceptible to quantification.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Chapter
Yael Kedar;
(2016)
Laying the Foundation for the Nomological Image of Nature: From Corporeity in Robert Grosseteste to Species in Roger Bacon
(/isis/citation/CBB290031289/)
Chapter
Rossi, Pietro B.;
(2012)
Grosseteste's Influence on Thirteenth- and Fourteenth-Century British Commentators on Posterior Analytics: A Preliminary Survey
(/isis/citation/CBB001200424/)
Book
Cunningham, Jack;
(2012)
Robert Grosseteste: His Thought and Its Impact
(/isis/citation/CBB001260630/)
Article
Christian Brouwer;
(2020)
Robert Grosseteste: la lumière et les fondements du monde
(/isis/citation/CBB203070990/)
Article
Clark, John R.;
(2006)
Anonymous on Alchemy, Aristotle, and Creation: An Unedited Thirteenth-Century Text
(/isis/citation/CBB001020529/)
Chapter
David Luscombe;
(2010)
Crossing Philosophical Boundaries c. 1150–c. 1250
(/isis/citation/CBB119071619/)
Article
Young, Spencer E.;
(2011)
Prohibition-Era Aristotelianism: Parisian Theologians and the Four Causes
(/isis/citation/CBB001200390/)
Book
Weill-Parot, Nicolas;
(2013)
Points aveugles de la nature: la rationnalité scientifique médiévale face à l'occulte, l'attraction magnétique et l'horreur du vide (XIIIe-milieu du XVe siècle)
(/isis/citation/CBB001551466/)
Article
Takahashi, Adam;
(2008)
Nature, Formative Power and Intellect in the Natural Philosophy of Albert the Great
(/isis/citation/CBB000850574/)
Article
Dunne, Michael;
(2003)
Thirteenth and Fourteenth-Century Commentaries on Aristotle's De Longitudine et Brevitate Vitae
(/isis/citation/CBB000470600/)
Chapter
Sean Murphy;
(2016)
The Corruption of the Elements: The Science of Ritual Impurity in the Early Thirteenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB367432483/)
Chapter
Christopher Bonfield;
(2016)
Medicine for the Body and Soul: Healthy Living in the Age of Bishop Grosseteste c. 1100–1400
(/isis/citation/CBB648408421/)
Chapter
Giles E. M. Gasper;
(2016)
The Fulfillment of Science: Nature, Creation and Man in the Hexaemeron of Robert Grosseteste
(/isis/citation/CBB535807978/)
Article
Nicola Polloni;
(2020)
Early Robert Grosseteste on Matter
(/isis/citation/CBB750708755/)
Article
Ovanes Akopyan;
(2018)
Giovanni Pico della Mirandola on Tides
(/isis/citation/CBB357666630/)
Article
Pietro Daniel Omodeo;
(2022)
The Distant Action of the Heavens in Girolamo Borri’s Tidal Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB317159378/)
Article
Ovanes Akopyan;
(2019)
In Search of a spiritus: Francesco Patrizi on Tides
(/isis/citation/CBB683888010/)
Article
Clutton-Brock, Martin;
Topper, David;
(2011)
The Plausibility of Galileo's Tidal Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB001230540/)
Article
Joly, Bernard;
(2008)
Présences stoïciennes dans les théories des marées aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
(/isis/citation/CBB000954420/)
Thesis
Dowd, Matthew F.;
(2003)
Astronomy and Compotus at Oxford University in the Early Thirteenth Century: The Works of Robert Grosseteste
(/isis/citation/CBB001561971/)
Traditio: Studies in Ancient and Medieval History, Thought, and Religion
Revue d'Histoire des Sciences
Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Intellectual History Review
Centaurus: International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science, and Technology
Be the first to comment!