Williams, Logan D. A. (Author)
Science studies scholars often study up to high-tech elites who produce and design scientific knowledge and technology. Methodological tension begins when you pair a desire to study down to less economically developed countries, with the desire to study up to high-tech elites within them. This becomes further complicated when the ethnographer and his/her informants share professional interests and credentials. In these situations, the researcher has high status because of geopolitical privilege. However, the researcher is neither a high-tech elite nor a local cultural elite. How might the ethnographer successfully access and navigate field sites imbued with these unseen power differentials? There are currently no visual mapping tools to enhance the process of reflexivity by feminist ethnographers, as they consider their globally embedded multiple, hierarchical, and situated positionality. This reflection methodology piece provides a tool to consider this phenomenon, as it exists across the Global North/South divide of power. Such a tool would be useful to northern ethnographers to better strategize ethics and access while avoiding complicity with structures of inequality and empowering their southern interlocutors.
...More
Article
Margarita S. Rayzberg;
(2019)
Fairness in the Field: The Ethics of Resource Allocation in Randomized Controlled Field Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB049902729/)
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
(/isis/citation/CBB661318783/)
Article
Yoshio Nukaga;
(July 2016)
Ethics Expertise and Public Credibility: A Case Study of the Ethical Principle of Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB610704199/)
Article
Marc Steen;
(May 2015)
Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Full: Exploring the Ethics in Design Practices
(/isis/citation/CBB908958824/)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
(/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)
Article
Sampsa Saikkonen;
Esa Väliverronen;
(2022)
The trickle-down of political and economic control: On the organizational suppression of environmental scientists in government science
(/isis/citation/CBB033206075/)
Article
Caitlin Donahue Wylie;
(March 2018)
Trust in Technicians in Paleontology Laboratories
(/isis/citation/CBB439482778/)
Article
Sky Edith Gross;
Shai Lavi;
Hagai Boas;
(2019)
Medicine, Technology, and Religion Reconsidered: The Case of Brain Death Definition in Israel
(/isis/citation/CBB228629534/)
Article
Brian Balmer;
(March 2017)
Shadow Values and the Politics of Extrapolation (Special Issue Commentary)
(/isis/citation/CBB819964335/)
Article
Nadine Levin;
Sabina Leonelli;
(March 2017)
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research
(/isis/citation/CBB290502459/)
Article
Daniel Neyland;
(January 2016)
Bearing Account-able Witness to the Ethical Algorithmic System
(/isis/citation/CBB408589504/)
Article
Roderic N. Crooks;
(2019)
Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB487672024/)
Article
Jill A. Fisher;
(March 2015)
Feeding and Bleeding: The Institutional Banalization of Risk to Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials
(/isis/citation/CBB066653855/)
Article
Kelly Joslin Holloway;
(September 2015)
Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization
(/isis/citation/CBB582502078/)
Article
Clémence Pinel;
(March 2021)
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science
(/isis/citation/CBB574556496/)
Article
Federico Brandmayr;
(May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB603433424/)
Article
Stephen C. Rea;
Hanzelle Kleeman;
Qin Zhu;
Benjamin Gilbert;
Chuan Yue;
(2020)
Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Methodological, Fair, and Political Considerations
(/isis/citation/CBB450321760/)
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2022)
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review
(/isis/citation/CBB437513195/)
Article
Mikko Lagerspetz;
(March 2021)
“The Grievance Studies Affair” Project: Reconstructing and Assessing the Experimental Design
(/isis/citation/CBB538391440/)
Article
Marie-Andrée Jacob;
(February 2019)
Under repair: A publication ethics and research record in the making
(/isis/citation/CBB050139593/)
Be the first to comment!